Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
PLoS One ; 12(11): e0187358, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29117200

ABSTRACT

AIMS: Structured management programmes deliver optimized care in heart failure patients and improve outcome. We examined the feasibility of including patients with migration background speaking little or no German in a heart failure management programme. METHODS AND RESULTS: After adaption of script material and staff to Turkish language we aimed to recruit 300 Turkish and 300 German (control group) patients within 18 months using the operational basis of a local heart failure management programme for screening, contact and inclusion. Of 488 and 1,055 eligible Turkish and German patients identified through screening, 165 Turkish (34%) and 335 German (32%) patients consented on participation (p = 0.46). General practitioners contributed significantly more of the Turkish (84%) than of the German patients (16%, p<0.001). Contact attempts by programme staff were significantly less successful in Turkish (52%) than in German patients (60%, p = 0.005) due to significantly higher rate of missing phone numbers (36% vs 25%), invalid address data (28% vs 7%) and being unreachable by phone more frequently (39% vs 26%, all p<0.001). Consent rate was significantly higher in successfully contacted Turkish (63%) compared to German patients (50%, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The inclusion of Turkish minority patients into a heart failure management programme is feasible with higher consent rate than in Germans. However, effort is high due to inherent logistic adaptions and barriers in identification and contacting of patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: DRKS00007780.


Subject(s)
Emigrants and Immigrants , Heart Failure/epidemiology , Aged , Case-Control Studies , Feasibility Studies , Female , General Practitioners/statistics & numerical data , Germany/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Mass Screening , Middle Aged , Patient Selection , Prospective Studies , Turkey/epidemiology
2.
Turk J Urol ; 40(1): 40-5, 2014 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26328144

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of ejaculation on serum total, free and complex prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels and their effect on biopsy decisions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Our study includes 47 men older than 45 years with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Patients' PSA levels were under 2.5 ng/mL, and there were no known conditions to preclude ejaculation. Eight patients with similar demographic, and clinical characteristics were chosen as a control group. With three days of sexual abstinence, blood samples were drawn for the measurement of baseline PSA levels, and then the patients were told to ejaculate. One, 5, 24 and 72 hours after ejaculation, serum total, free and complexed PSA levels were measured. Serum PSA sampling was performed at the same intervals in the control group without ejaculation. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 59.13±1.38 years in the study group, and 63.75±3.13 years in the control group. The mean international prostate symptom scores (IPSS) were 11.78±1.12 and 11.63±3.32 in the study, and the control groups, respectively. The mean baseline total, free, and complexed PSA values were 1.07±0.09, 0.31±0.03, and 0.71±0.08 ng/mL, respectively. In the study group, total PSA value was found to be 1.29±0.12 ng/mL (p=0.008) at first hour after ejaculation, and this change was statistically significant when compared with baseline values. Mean total PSA level rose up to 1.28±0.13 ng/mL (p=0.05) by the 5(th) hour after ejaculation, but this change was not statistically significant relative to the baseline values. Mean free PSA level rose after the first hour postejaculation to 0.37±0.04 ng/mL (p=0.01) and after the fifth hour postejaculation to 0.37±0.04 ng/mL (p=0.002), and these changes were statistically significant relative to the baseline values. There were no statistically significant changes at the other sampled times as for the total, free or complexed PSA serum levels. When all three values were considered individually, in only 2.12% of the patients, biopsy decisions could be affected by the elevation in PSA levels. CONCLUSION: When the PSA value is borderline with respect to biopsy decisions, the effect of ejaculation on serum PSA levels may be clinically important. In these patients, ejaculation must be questioned, and repeated. PSA levels should be evaluated 24 hours after ejaculation. There were no statistically significant changes in the levels of complex PSA values. Further studies are needed to clarify the relationship between complexed PSA and ejaculation.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...