Evolution of a minimally invasive oesophagectomy program - effective complication management is key.

Introduction: Despite improvements in patient selection, operative technique, and postoperative care, oesophagectomy remains one of the most morbid oncologic resection types. Introduction of minimally invasive practice has been shown to have a greater marginal benefit for oesophagectomy than most of the other types of procedures. Aim: To evaluate early surgical outcomes through the adoption of totally minimally invasive oesophagectomy and accumulating experience in perioperative management. Material and methods: All patients with mid and distal oesophageal carcinoma who underwent oesophagectomy and gastric conduit construction between June 2004 and December 2021 were recorded prospectively. Demographic information, neoadjuvant treatment, operative data, and perioperative mortality/morbidity were evaluated. Patients were classified depending on the timeline and predominant surgical approach: Group 1 (2004-2011, open surgery), Group 2 (2011-2015, adoption period of minimally invasive surgery), and Group 3 (2015-2021, routine minimally invasive surgery). Results: In total, 167 patients were identified (Group 1, n = 48; Group 2, n = 44; Group 3, n = 75). Group 3 was significantly older (59.5 ±11.6 vs. 54.1 ±10.6 years and 56.2 ±10.8 years; p = 0.031).The likelihood of successful completion of a totally minimally invasive esophagectomy was increased as well as the preference for intrathoracic anastomosis (p < 0.0001 for both). The major morbidity rate was stable across the groups, but 90-day mortality significantly decreased for the most recent cohort. Conclusions: Accumulating experience led to enhanced success in completion of minimally invasive oesophagectomy, and intrathoracic anastomosis was increasingly the preferred modality. Surgical mortality decreased over time despite the older patients and comparable perioperative morbidity including anastomotic leaks. Improvement in the management of complications is an apparent contributor to good perioperative outcomes as well as technical development.

Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery esophagectomy outcomes in 40 consecutive patients.

OBJECTIVES: Minimally invasive esophagectomy has improved over time becoming faster and less invasive. We have changed our technical approach from multiportal to uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) esophagectomy over the years. In this study, we analysed our results with uniportal VATS esophagectomy technique. METHODS: This study was a retrospective analysis of 40 consecutive patients with the intent to perform uniportal VATS esophagectomy for esophageal cancer between July 2017 and August 2021. Demographic criteria, comorbidities, neoadjuvant therapy, intraoperative data, complications, length of stay, pathological data, 30- and 90-day mortality and 2-year survival data were recorded. RESULTS: Forty patients (21 female) were operated (median age 62.9 [53.5-70.25]). Eighteen patients (45%) received neoadjuvant chemoradiation. The chest part of all cases was started with uniportal VATS and 31 (77.5%) was completed uniportally (34 Ivor Lewis, 6 McKeown). The median thoracic operation time in minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy was 90 min (77.5-100). The median time for uniportal side-to-side anastomosis was 12 min (11-16). Five (12.5%) patients had leak, and 4 were intrathoracic. Twenty-eight (70%) patients had squamous cell carcinoma, 11 adenocarcinoma and 1 squamous cell carcinoma with sarcomatoid differentiation. Thirty-seven (92.5%) patients had R0 resection. The mean number of lymph nodes dissected was 24 ± 9.5. Thirty- and ninety-day mortality was 2.5% (n = 1). The mean follow-up was 44 ± 2.8 months. Two-year survival was 80%. CONCLUSIONS: Uniportal VATS esophagectomy is a safe, fast and feasible alternative to other minimally invasive and open approaches. Comparable results to contemporary series are observed in perioperative and oncologic outcomes.

FDG PET/CT Features of Polysaccharide-Based Hemostatic Agent: Chronic Inflammatory Changes Can Mimic Metastatic Lesions.

PURPOSE: To prevent hemorrhagic complications, hemostatic agents (HAs) have been widely used in recent years. The use of HAs can lead to false-positive results on postoperative imaging. There exists only 1 study in the literature evaluating these applications during surgical procedures. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the postoperative imaging features of polysaccharide-based HAs in thoracic surgery patients who have had 18F-FDG PET/CT scans. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred nine consecutive patients who underwent thoracic surgery were enrolled in this study. A topical polysaccharide-based HA was applied to the surgical bed for all of the patients. The patients diagnosed with cancer were followed up with subsequent thoracic CT scans, and 42 of these patients were also imaged with 18F-FDG PET/CT, which then comprised the main study group. Due to suspicion of metastasis, 19/42 patients were reoperated or rebiopsied. The latest histopathological findings were accepted as criterion standard, and previous FDG PET/CT images were retrospectively reevaluated. RESULTS: Polysaccharide-based HAs that appear as amorphous basophilic material were identified in histopathological samples of 11/19 patients. Lymphocytes, plasma cells, and histiocytes, which formed foreign body reaction and/or foreign body granuloma, indicating the presence of chronic inflammation, were seen in all of the samples. 18F-FDG PET/CT showed increased FDG uptake in all of these lesions. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the inconsistency of the literature, polysaccharide-based HAs can be demonstrated in human surgical specimens as amorphous basophilic materials even after a long time from the initial surgical procedure. These agents almost always cause chronic inflammatory changes. In addition, these agents may mimic "false-positive" findings on postoperative FDG PET/CT scans.

Minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy in a patient with situs inversus totalis through a total of five ports.

Situs inversus totalis is inverse placement of intra-thoracic and abdominal organs identical with a mirror image. Herein, we present a rare case of situs inversus totalis and gastroesophageal junction carcinoma treated with minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. A 73-year-old male patient presented with dysphagia and a diagnosis of adenocarcinoma was made. He underwent three-port laparoscopic gastric conduit preparation without using a liver retractor. Esophageal mobilization in the chest was completed with biportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery technique and a completely side-to-side stapled anastomosis. The patient is still alive without recurrence four years after surgery. Minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy can be performed in these cases; however, a careful planning and rethinking of the anatomy for correct intraoperative orientation are needed. Similar surgical and oncological outcomes are expected in this patient population.

Optimal Timing for Removal of the Double-J Stent After Kidney Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Urologic complications (UC) have gradually decreased in recent years after advanced surgical experience. The incidence of urologic complications varies between 0.22% and 30% in different medical studies. There is no routine usage of double-J stenting (DJS) during renal transplantation (RT) in the literature. It is a necessity, and optimal timing for stent removal is an important question for many transplantation centers. METHODS: This study includes 818 renal transplant patients whose ureteroneocystostomy anastomoses were completed by use of the Lich-Gregorie procedure during a 2-year period at a transplantation center. We performed 926 renal transplantations at Antalya Medical Park Hospital Renal Transplantation Center between January 2014 and January 2016. The patients were divided into four groups according to the timing of DJS removal. RESULTS: For group 1, removal time for DJS was between 5 and 7 days; group 2, Removal time for DJS was between 8 and 14 days; group 3, removal time for DJS was between 15 and 21 days; and group 4, removal time for DJS was later than 22 days. The patients were divided into two groups according to removal time of stent as 5 to 14 days and >15 days. DJS was performed again in the patients whose urine output was reduced during the first 5 days after removal of the DJS, whose creatine level increased, and whose graft ureter and collecting tubules were extended as an ultrasonographic finding. CONCLUSIONS: There is no declared optimal time for the removal of DJS. The removal time was reported between postoperative first week and 3 months in some of the reports of RT centers, according to their protocols. We emphasize that the optimal time for the removal of DJS is 14 to 21 days after RT, based on the findings of our large case report study.