Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) ; 17(5): 452-459, 2019 11 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30690631

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Trigeminal neuralgia associated with multiple sclerosis (MS-TN) is comparatively rare and larger series of percutaneous balloon compression (PBC) in such cases are few in the literature. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the results after PBC for MS-TN with regards to therapeutic effect, side effects, and complications. METHODS: One hundred eleven procedures with PBC performed in 66 cases of MS-TN were analyzed. Therapeutic effect was measured as postoperative time to pain recurrence without medication. All complications were compiled and the sensory function was evaluated in a subgroup of cases. RESULTS: The initial pain free rate was 67% and the median time to pain recurrence was 8 mo. Thirty-six patients were treated with PBC only, and among them, the results were worse if treated 3 to 4 times before, compared to first treatment (P = .009-.034). Patients who had several PBCs had worse results already after the first surgery (P < .001). A significant number of patients had impaired sensation to light touch directly after surgery, which was normalized at the late follow-up. Sensimetric testing showed raised thresholds for perception and pain directly after surgery (P = .004-.03), but these were also normalized at the late follow-up. CONCLUSION: PBC is a treatment that can be effective for many patients with MS-TN. Repeated previous surgeries is a risk factor for an unsatisfactory outcome. However, the patients with multiple surgeries had less satisfactory results already at the first procedure, indicating that a therapy resistant disease can be predicted after the first two PBCs. Postoperative sensory deficits were common but not lasting.


Subject(s)
Multiple Sclerosis/complications , Rhizotomy/methods , Trigeminal Ganglion/surgery , Trigeminal Neuralgia/surgery , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cohort Studies , Humans , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement , Proportional Hazards Models , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Trigeminal Neuralgia/complications
2.
Neurosurgery ; 78(3): 421-8; discussion 428, 2016 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26465639

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Despite >30 years of clinical use, the literature is still sparse when it comes to comparisons between percutaneous balloon compression (PBC) and percutaneous retrogasserian glycerol rhizolysis (PRGR) as treatments for trigeminal neuralgia. OBJECTIVE: To perform a retrospective cohort comparison between PBC and PRGR with regard to therapeutic effect, side effects, and complications. METHODS: Medical records and follow-up data from 124 primary PRGRs performed from 1986 to 2000 and 82 primary PBCs performed from 2000 to 2013 were reviewed. All patients had undergone clinical sensory testing and assessment of sensory thresholds. Analyses were performed to compare duration of pain relief, frequency of sensory disturbances, and side effects. RESULTS: Median duration of pain relief was 21 months after PRGR and 20 months after PBC. Both methods carried a high risk of hypesthesia/hypalgesia (P < .001) that was partly reversed with time. Decreased corneal sensibility was common after PRGR (P < .001) but not after PBC. Dysesthesia was more common after PRGR (23%) compared after PBC (4%; P < .001). Other side effects were noted but uncommon. CONCLUSION: PBC and PRGR are both effective as primary surgical treatment of trigeminal neuralgia. Both carry a risk of postoperative hypesthesia, but in this series, the side effect profile favored PBC. Furthermore, PBC is technically less challenging, whereas PRGR requires fewer resources. Between these 2 techniques, we propose PBC as the primary surgical technique for percutaneous treatment of trigeminal neuralgia on the basis of its lower incidence of dysesthesia, corneal hypesthesia, and technical failures.


Subject(s)
Balloon Occlusion/methods , Rhizotomy/methods , Trigeminal Neuralgia/therapy , Adult , Aged , Balloon Occlusion/adverse effects , Cohort Studies , Female , Glycerol/therapeutic use , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Rhizotomy/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome
3.
World Neurosurg ; 79(2): 359-68, 2013 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22480980

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To describe percutaneous balloon compression (PBC) of the trigeminal rootlets as treatment for trigeminal neuralgia (TN), including history, operative techniques, outcomes, side effects, and some recent findings increasing the likelihood of a positive outcome. METHODS: PBC is indicated in patients with TN in whom microvascular decompression is considered less suitable. The procedure is simplified by the use of biplanar fluoroscopy, although it is usually carried out with C-arm fluoroscopy to facilitate the introduction of the needle and the visualization of the inflated catheter. In the right position, a clearly defined pear shape usually appears after injection of 0.5-0.7 mL of contrast material. The balloon is kept inflated for 1.5-3 minutes. It is crucial to obtain a pear shape because this probably is the most significant factor for obtaining good, long-lasting pain relief. RESULTS: An analysis of 100 consecutive PBC procedures showed an initial success rate of 90% and a median pain-free time without medication of 28 months. Subdividing these patients into primary TN (n = 77) and TN secondary to multiple sclerosis (n = 23), the median pain-free times were 33 months and 24 months (P = 0.2), indicating that the outcome may depend on the preoperative conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Complications and side effects include cardiovascular stress during the procedure, local hemorrhages in the cheek, postoperative sensory disturbance, masseter weakness, infections, and transitory diplopia after surgery. Measures to minimize side effects are proposed. With meticulous technique, PBC is a straightforward, effective, and fast procedure that compares well with other percutaneous therapies for TN.


Subject(s)
Balloon Embolectomy/instrumentation , Microvascular Decompression Surgery/methods , Trigeminal Neuralgia/surgery , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cohort Studies , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Humans , Male , Microvascular Decompression Surgery/adverse effects , Microvascular Decompression Surgery/instrumentation , Middle Aged , Multiple Sclerosis/complications , Multiple Sclerosis/diagnostic imaging , Multiple Sclerosis/therapy , Patient Selection , Radiography , Treatment Outcome , Trigeminal Neuralgia/diagnostic imaging , Trigeminal Neuralgia/etiology
4.
J Neurosurg ; 113(3): 498-507, 2010 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20345223

ABSTRACT

OBJECT: Percutaneous balloon compression is a simple and effective treatment of trigeminal neuralgia. However, results between and within different series are varying. To further improve the results in terms of pain relief, the authors believe that a careful study of the surgical procedure is important. The object of this study was to analyze the impact of balloon shape, balloon position, balloon volume, and compression time on duration of the therapeutic effect following percutaneous balloon compression. Furthermore, they analyzed the sensory side effects associated with this treatment, and how these relate to surgical parameters. METHODS: Medical records and intraoperative radiographs from 87 balloon compressions were reviewed, and different surgical parameters were categorized. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to correlate surgical parameters to pain relief. Sensory testing with a transcutaneous electrical stimulation technique and clinical examination data were reviewed to analyze changes in sensory function. RESULTS: The balloon shape had a significant impact on time to recurrence of pain. A pear-shaped balloon resulted in a far better surgical result than a non-pear-shaped balloon (p < 0.001). The difference between a distinct and a less distinct pear shape was not significant (p = 0.14). Statistical significance was not reached for any of the other parameters in relation to duration of therapeutic effect. A pear-shaped balloon was also significantly associated with increased thresholds for percutaneous electrical stimulation in the immediate postoperative period, but the perception thresholds were normalized at the late follow-up at 3-9 months. A similar outcome was found for clinical testing with light touch and pinprick. CONCLUSIONS: The authors have demonstrated that using a pear-shaped balloon when performing percutaneous balloon compression for trigeminal neuralgia results in longer pain relief than non-pear-shaped balloons. Other surgical parameters seemed less important with respect to pain relief. Balloon compression also, in many cases, results in hypesthesia.


Subject(s)
Catheterization/methods , Neurosurgical Procedures/methods , Trigeminal Neuralgia/physiopathology , Trigeminal Neuralgia/surgery , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Catheterization/adverse effects , Catheterization/instrumentation , Electric Stimulation , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neurosurgical Procedures/adverse effects , Neurosurgical Procedures/instrumentation , Pain/surgery , Physical Stimulation , Recurrence , Sensation , Sensory Thresholds , Time Factors , Touch , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...