The Relationship between Post-Battle Experiences and Thwarted Belongingness and Perceived Burdensomeness in Three United States Military Samples.

Suicide rates within the military are elevated relative to the general population; however, research suggests that many of the suicide risk factors for military personnel are similar to the suicide risk factors for civilians. Given that many military specific experiences (e.g., number of deployments) are not considered robust predictors of either suicidal ideation or behavior, it has been posited that deployment specific experiences (e.g., post-battle experiences) may be better able to explain the increased rates of suicide among military personnel. Therefore, the current study aimed to examine the relationship between post-battle experiences and perceived burdensomeness (PB), thwarted belongingness (TB), and suicidal ideation within 3 different military samples: a non-clinical sample of Army National Guard personnel, a non-clinical sample of active duty U.S. Air Force Security Forces personnel, and a clinical sample of U.S. Army personnel receiving outpatient treatment. Post-battle experiences were found to be significantly associated with TB in both non-clinical samples; however, the association between post-battle experiences and TB was non-significant within the clinical sample. Furthermore, results indicated that post-battle experiences were not significantly associated with either PB or suicidal ideation in any of the samples. These findings suggest that in non-clinical samples, post-battle experiences impact a soldier's ability to feel connected to others. Within clinical samples, results indicate that post-battle experiences may not be a direct contributor to either PB or TB. These results indicate a need for universal intervention promoting interpersonal support of military personnel and their families prior to development of further need for psychological interventions. This upstream approach may decrease further development of TB and potentially prevent suicidal desire.

Military personnel compared to multiple suicide attempters: Interpersonal theory of suicide constructs.

The current study aimed to address the discrepancy between suicide rates in the military and general population by comparing facets of the interpersonal theory of suicide between civilians with multiple suicide attempts and U.S. military personnel. Military personnel exhibited higher levels of capability for suicide but lower levels of perceived burdensomeness and thwarted belongingness than civilian multiple attempters. When comparing only personnel endorsing ideation and civilian multiple attempters, the significant difference for capability remained, but the differences for perceived burdensomeness and thwarted belongingness became nonsignificant. Results suggest the emergence of ideation places personnel at a greater risk for suicide than many civilian multiple attempters.

Agitation as a Moderator of the Relationship Between Insomnia and Current Suicidal Ideation in the Military.

Research has established a link between agitation and insomnia, both of which are considered to be risk factors for suicide. The present study aimed to investigate the moderating role of agitation within the relationship between insomnia and current suicidal ideation in a sample of U.S. military personnel. Consistent with hypotheses, the relationship between insomnia and current suicidal ideation was significant only at high levels of agitation. Results support previous findings indicating that both insomnia and agitation are suicide risk factors. These findings clarify the role of known risk factors in the pathway to suicide and may contribute to the advancement of suicide detection and prevention, as these factors may be more easily identified in individuals unwilling to admit thoughts of death and suicide, such as many military personnel.

Treating the Capability for Suicide: A Vital and Understudied Frontier in Suicide Prevention.

Current efforts at suicide prevention center largely on reducing suicidal desire among individuals hospitalized for suicidality or being treated for related psychopathology. Such efforts have yielded evidence-based treatments, and yet the national suicide rate has continued to climb. We propose that this disconnect is heavily influenced by an unmet need to consider population-level interventions aimed at reducing the capability for suicide. Drawing on lessons learned from other public health phenomena that have seen drastic declines in frequency in recent decades (HIV, lung cancer, motor vehicle accidents), we propose that current suicidality treatment efforts trail current suicidality theories in their lack of focus on the extent to which individuals thinking about suicide are capable of transitioning from ideation to attempt. We summarize extant evidence for specific capability-centered approaches (e.g., means safety) and propose other options for improving our ability to address this largely overlooked variable. We also note that population-level approaches in this regard would represent an important opportunity to decrease risk in individuals who either lack access to evidence-based care or underreport suicidal ideation, as a reduced capability for suicide would theoretically diminish the potency of suicidal desire and, in this sense, lower the odds of a transition from ideation to attempt.