The relation between usage of an eHealth intervention for stress urinary incontinence and treatment outcomes: an observational study.

BACKGROUND: Stress urinary incontinence (SUI), though a prevalent condition among women, is undertreated in primary care. EHealth with pelvic floor muscle training is an evidence-based alternative to care-as-usual. It is unknown, however, how eHealth usage is related to treatment outcome, and this knowledge is required for general practitioners to implement eHealth in their practice. This study examines the relation between usage of eHealth for SUI and treatment outcomes by examining log data. Baseline factors were also explored for associations with treatment success. METHOD: In this pre-post study, women with SUI participated in "Baasoverjeblaas.nl", a web-based intervention translated from the Swedish internet intervention "Tät®-treatment of stress urinary incontinence". Usage was based on log data and divided into three user groups (low, intermediate and high). Online questionnaires were sent before, after treatment and at six-months follow-up. The relation between usage and the primary outcome - treatment success (PGI-) - was studied with a binomial logistic regression analysis. Changes in the secondary outcomes - symptom severity (ICIQ-UI SF) and quality of life (ICIQ-LUTSqol) - were studied per user group with linear mixed model analysis. RESULTS: Included were 515 users with a mean age of 50.5 years (12.0 SD). The majority were low users (n = 295, 57.3%). Treatment success (PGI-I) was reached by one in four women and was more likely in high and intermediate users than in low users (OR 13.2, 95% CI 6.1-28.5, p < 0.001 and OR 2.92, 95% CI 1.35-6.34, p = 0.007, respectively). Symptom severity decreased and quality of life improved significantly over time, especially among high users. The women's expected ability to train their pelvic floor muscles and the frequency of pelvic floor muscle exercises at baseline were associated with treatment success. CONCLUSION: This study shows that usage of eHealth for SUI is related to all treatment outcomes. High users are more likely to have treatment success. Treatment success is more likely in women with higher expectations and pelvic floor muscle training at baseline. These findings indicate that general practitioners can select patients that would be more likely to benefit from eHealth treatment, and they can enhance treatment effect by stimulating eHealth usage. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Landelijk Trial Register NL6570;  https://onderzoekmetmensen.nl/nl/trial/25463 .

Usage of a Web-Based eHealth Intervention for Women With Stress Urinary Incontinence: Mixed Methods Study.

BACKGROUND: Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is highly prevalent among women and has an impact on physical and mental well-being. eHealth with pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) has shown to be effective in reducing complaints. The usage and nonusage attrition of eHealth for SUI is unknown, but knowledge about users and their usage patterns is crucial for implementation purposes. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate how an eHealth intervention for SUI was used and by whom, explore reasons for nonusage attrition, and determine what factors are associated with usage. METHODS: In this observational, mixed methods study, women with SUI independently registered to a web-based eHealth intervention, Baas over je blaas, a translation of the Swedish internet program Tät-treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Log-in data were collected during 3-month access to the website, and surveys were sent at baseline. Participants were divided into three user groups (low, intermediate, and high) and were compared based on sociodemographic and incontinence-related characteristics. Nominal logistic regression analysis was used to study factors associated with eHealth usage. Qualitative content analysis was used for open-ended questions about nonusage attrition and about facilitators of and barriers to eHealth usage. RESULTS: Participants (n=561) had a mean age of 50.3 (SD 12.1) years, and most of them (340/553, 61.5%) had never visited a health care professional for SUI before. Most users were low users (295/515, 57.3%), followed by intermediate users (133/515, 25.8%) and high users (87/515, 16.9%). User groups differed significantly in age (48.3, SD 12 years; 52.1, SD 11.6 years; and 55.3, SD 10.9 years; P<.001) and in their expected ability to train the pelvic floor muscles (7.5, SD 1.4; 7.7, SD 1.4; and 8.1, SD 1.5 for low, intermediate, and high users, respectively; P=.006). Nonusage attrition was mainly caused by problems in integrating PFMT into everyday life. High age (>50 years), previous PFMT, and high expected ability to train the pelvic floor muscles are associated with high usage. Facilitators for eHealth usage were the clear explanation of exercises and the possibility of self-management. Barriers were its noncommittal character and the absence of personal contact. CONCLUSIONS: eHealth fulfills a need for women with SUI who have never received treatment. Those who discontinued prematurely did so mainly because it was difficult to integrate the training schedule into their everyday lives. High eHealth usage was more likely for women aged >50 years, with previous PFMT, and with high expectations about their ability to train the pelvic floor muscles. Knowledge of these user characteristics can guide clinicians and correct their misunderstandings about the suitable target population for this intervention. Furthermore, strategies for reinforcing expectations and self-efficacy are important to upscale eHealth usage, together with paying attention to people's need for personal contact. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.2196/13164.

Women's adoption of a web-based intervention for stress urinary incontinence: a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is common among women and affects their quality of life. Pelvic floor muscle training is an effective conservative therapy, but only a minority of women seek help. E-health with pelvic floor muscle training is effective and increases access to care. To implement an e-Health intervention in a sustainable way, however, we need to understand what determines adoption. The aim is to investigate the barriers and facilitators to adopting an e-Health intervention among Dutch women with stress urinary incontinence. METHODS: Semi-structured telephonic interviews were carried out among participants of the Dutch e-Health intervention for women with stress urinary incontinence. Women were purposively sampled. The 'Fit between Individuals, Task and Technology' (FITT) framework was used for both the data collection and data analysis, to gain a more in-depth insight into the adoption of the intervention. RESULTS: Twenty women were interviewed, mean age 51 years and mostly highly educated. The adoption of e-Health for women with SUI mainly depends on the interaction between users and e-Health, and users and pelvic floor muscle training exercises. Facilitators for the adoption were the preference for an accessible self-management intervention, having a strong sense of self-discipline and having the ability to schedule the exercises routinely. Women needed to possess self-efficacy to do this intervention independently. Barriers to the adoption of e-Health were personal circumstances restricting time for scheduling pelvic floor muscle training and lacking skills to perform the exercises correctly. Despite guidance by technical features several women remained uncertain about their performance of the exercises and, therefore, wanted additional contact with a professional. CONCLUSIONS: For stress urinary incontinence e-Health is an appropriate option for a target audience. Use of the FITT framework clearly demonstrates the conditions for optimal adoption. For a subgroup it was a suitable alternative for medical care in person. For others it identified the need for further support by a health care professional. This support could be provided by improvements of technical features and incorporating modes for digital communication. The additional value of integration of the e-Health intervention in primary care might be a logical next step. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was prospectively registered in the Netherlands Trial Registry (NTR) NTR6956 .

Referring patients with chronic kidney disease back to primary care: a criteria-based analysis in outpatient renal clinics.

BACKGROUND: The increased demand for nephrology care for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) necessitates a critical review of the need for secondary care facilities and the possibilities for referral back to primary care. This study aimed to evaluate the characteristics and numbers of patients who could potentially be referred back to primary care, using predefined criteria developed by nephrologists and general practitioners. METHOD: We organised a consensus meeting with eight nephrologists and two general practitioners to define the back referral (BR) criteria, and performed a retrospective cohort study reviewing records from patients under nephrologist care in three hospitals. RESULTS: We reached a consensus about the BR criteria. Overall, 78 of the 300 patients (26%) in the outpatient clinics met the BR criteria. The characteristics of the patients who met the BR criteria were: 56.4% male, a median age of 70, an average of 3.0 outpatients visits per year, and a mean estimated glomerular filtration rate of 46 ml/min/1,73m2. Hypertension was present in 67.9% of this group, while 27.3% had diabetes and 16.9% had cancer. The patients who could be referred back represented all CKD stages except stage G5. The most common stage (16%) was G3bA2 (eGFR 30 ≤ 44 and ACR 3 ≤ 30). CONCLUSION: A substantial proportion of patients were eligible for referral back to primary care. These patients often have a comorbidity, such as hypertension or diabetes. Future research should focus on generalisability of the BR criteria, the feasibility of actual implementation of the back referral, follow-up assessments of renal function and patient satisfaction.

An Electronic Health Intervention for Dutch Women With Stress Urinary Incontinence: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study.

BACKGROUND: Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is a common problem with a great potential influence on quality of life. Although SUI can be treated effectively with pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT), only a minority of women with this complaint seek help. An internet-based electronic health (eHealth) intervention could make care more accessible. The Swedish eHealth intervention Tät-treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence offers PFMT and has shown to be effective in reducing symptoms in women with SUI. This intervention might be helpful for Dutch women too, but its adoption needs to be studied as the Netherlands differs from Sweden in terms of geographical characteristics and health care organization. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this protocol is to investigate the barriers and facilitators to the adoption of an eHealth intervention for Dutch women with SUI and the effects of this intervention. METHODS: We are conducting an explanatory sequential mixed methods study among 800 Dutch women with SUI who participate in the translated version of Tät-treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence. This eHealth intervention takes 3 months. A pre-post study is conducted using surveys, which are sent at baseline (T0), 3 weeks after baseline (T1), posttreatment (T2), and 3 months posttreatment (T3). After the intervention, semistructured interviews will be held with 15 to 20 participants. The primary outcomes are barriers and facilitators to using the Tät-treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence. This will also be analyzed among groups that differ in age and severity of incontinence. A thematic content analysis of the qualitative data will be performed. The secondary outcomes are: (1) effect on symptoms of urinary incontinence, (2) effect on quality of life, and (3) factors that are potentially associated with success. Effects will be analyzed by a mixed model analysis. Logistic regression analysis will be used to study what patient-related factors are associated with success. RESULTS: Enrollment started in July 2018 and will be finished by December 2019. Data analysis will start in March 2020. CONCLUSIONS: An eHealth intervention for Dutch women with SUI is promising because it can make treatment more accessible. The strength of this study is that it explores the possibilities for an internet-based-only treatment for women with SUI by using both quantitative and qualitative research methodologies. The study elaborates on existing results by using a previously tested and effective eHealth program. Insight into the barriers and facilitators to using this program can enhance the implementation of the intervention in the Dutch health care system. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Registry (NTR) NTR6956; https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/6570. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/13164.

Effects of access to radiology in out-of-hours primary care in the Netherlands: a prospective observational study.

Background: In the Netherlands, out-of-hours primary care is provided in general-practitioner-cooperatives (GPCs). These are increasingly located on site with emergency departments (ED), forming Emergency-Care-Access-Points (ECAP). A more efficient and economical organization of out-of-hours primary emergency care could be realized by increased collaboration at an ECAP. In this study, we compared the effects of different models with respect to access to (hospital) radiology by the GPC. We investigated patient and care characteristics, indication for diagnostics and outcomes at GPCs with and without access to radiology. Methods: A prospective observational record review study of patients referred for conventional radiology for trauma by one of five GPCs in the period April 2014-October 2015, covering three organizational models. Results: The mean age was 31 years and 56% was female. Extremities were predominately involved (91%). There was a medical indication for radiology in 85% and the assessed risk by requesting GPs on abnormalities was high in 66%. There was a significant difference in outcomes between models. Radiological abnormalities (fractures/luxations) were present in 51% without direct access and in 35% with partial and unlimited access. Overall, 61% of the included patients were referred to the ED; 100% in the models without access and 38% in the models with (partial) access. Conclusions: GPC access to radiology is beneficial for patients and professionals. The diagnostics were adequately used. With access to radiology, unnecessary referrals and specialist care are prevented. This may lead to a decrease in ED attendance and overcrowding.