Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Infez Med ; 28(1): 70-77, 2020 Mar 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32172263

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to gauge the reasons for accepting or declining influenza vaccine in healthcare staff in Saudi Arabia. A questionnaire was administered to healthcare workers in Saudi Arabia. In all, 633 respondents who provided gender, nationality and profession were included. Reasons for vaccine uptake or refusal were assessed according to profession and educational level. Uptake of vaccine was lower in the period from 2010 to 2014 (3-13.3%) compared to pre-2010 figures (20.7%), rising to 44.1% in 2015. Comparing data for 'never having been vaccinated' to 'being vaccinated in 2015', there was no significant difference in distribution between nurses (9.27% v 38.8%), physicians (13.9% v 56.0%) and laboratory technicians (15.9% v 33.5%) (p= 0.08). The top reason for vaccination was protection of self and family, while the top reason for refusal was not considering the vaccine to be necessary. Education level had no significant effect on the likelihood of being vaccinated. Improvement of healthcare worker vaccination levels in Saudi Arabia might be achieved by addressing staff concerns on vaccine safety and efficacy, emphasizing the potential dangers of influenza and capitalizing on the staff's focus on protecting themselves and their families.


Subject(s)
Health Personnel/psychology , Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage , Treatment Adherence and Compliance/psychology , Vaccination Refusal/psychology , Attitude of Health Personnel , Female , Health Facility Administrators/psychology , Health Facility Administrators/statistics & numerical data , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Laboratory Personnel/psychology , Laboratory Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Male , Medical Staff/psychology , Medical Staff/statistics & numerical data , Nursing Staff/psychology , Nursing Staff/statistics & numerical data , Physical Therapists/psychology , Physical Therapists/statistics & numerical data , Saudi Arabia , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment Adherence and Compliance/statistics & numerical data , Vaccination Refusal/statistics & numerical data
2.
Toxicol Ind Health ; 29(3): 300-4, 2013 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22294443

ABSTRACT

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PCAHs), particularly those with a high molecular weight, have been classified as probable carcinogens to humans. The aim of the present study is to determine the levels of PCAHs in samples of meat, fish, chicken, fried potato, and toasted bread, which will be thermally processed using conventional and microwave ovens. Different samples will be collected and analyzed for five PCAHs including pyrene, benzo(a)anthracene, benzo(e)pyrene, benzoflouroanthene, and benzo(a)pyrene. The analytical method involves saponification with methanolic potassium hydroxide, extraction with cyclohexane, and determination by high-performance liquid chromatography. The obtained results showed that there is a variation in the detected PCAHs in different foodstuffs. Fried potato processed by conventional oven or microwave oven showed none of the selected studied PCAHs. It was found that, chicken showed higher content levels of total PCAHs than the meat and fish. Data are the highest mean concentrations of fluoranthene and benzo(a)pyrene but within low limit. The obtained results were compared with international permissible levels to avoid pollution, which may cause hazardous effects on individual and society.


Subject(s)
Food Contamination/analysis , Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons/analysis , Analysis of Variance , Animals , Cattle , Chickens , Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid/methods , Fishes , Meat/analysis , Solanum tuberosum
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...