A phase II trial evaluating capecitabine and irinotecan as second line treatment in patients with oesophago-gastric cancer who have progressed on, or within 3 months of platinum-based chemotherapy.

RATIONALE: There is no standard second line therapy for relapsed oesophago-gastric (O-G) cancer. METHODS: We recruited 29 eligible patients with relapsed O-G cancer who had progressed during or within 3 months of prior chemotherapy to assess the efficacy and toxicity of capecitabine [2,000 mg/(m(2) day) on days 1-14] and irinotecan (250 mg/m(2)) given every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Five patients (17%) demonstrated objective response, while a further seven patients (24%) achieved disease stabilisation. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 3.1 months (95% CI = 2.2-4.1 months) and 6.5 months (95%CI = 6-7.1 months), respectively. Among symptomatic patients, palliation of tumour-related symptoms included resolution of reflux (5/12 pts), dysphagia (3/9 pts) and weight loss (4/9 pts), improvements in anorexia (4/10 pts), nausea (3/4 pts), vomiting (4/6 pts) and pain (4/16 pts). Grade 3-4 toxicities were diarrhoea (15%), nausea and vomiting (7%), lethargy (31%), neutropenia (31%), anemia (14%) and thrombocytopenia (7%). CONCLUSIONS: Capecitabine and irinotecan has anti-tumour activity as second line treatment for relapsed O-G cancer, and provides an important improvement in disease related symptoms.

Mortality within 30 days of chemotherapy: a clinical governance benchmarking issue for oncology patients.

No national benchmark figures exist for early mortality due to chemotherapy unlike for surgical interventions. Deaths within 30 days of chemotherapy during a 6-month period were identified from the Royal Marsden Hospital electronic patient records. Treatment intention--curative or palliative, cause of death and number of previous treatments--were documented. Between April 2005 and September 2005, 1976 patients received chemotherapy with 161 deaths within 30 days of chemotherapy (8.1%). Of these, 124 deaths (77.0%) were due to disease progression. Of the other 37 deaths, 12 (7.5%) were related to chemotherapy, six each for solid tumours and haematological malignancies, of which seven (4.3%) were due to neutropenic sepsis. For the remaining 25 deaths (15.5%) there was insufficient information. There were more deaths after third and subsequent lines of therapy than with first and secondlines of therapy. Only 12 of the 161 deaths occurred in patients who were receiving potentially curative chemotherapy to give a mortality rate in breast and gastrointestinal malignancy of 0.5 and 1.5%, respectively. It is possible to audit mortality within 30 days of chemotherapy and this should become a benchmark for standard practice nationally. Most deaths were due to disease progression in the palliative setting. We practice this form of audit each quarter and feed back to the treating teams so that deaths are discussed and practice monitored.

Mitomycin C, vinblastine and cisplatin (MVP): an active and well-tolerated salvage regimen for advanced breast cancer.

This phase II study assessed the clinical efficacy and tolerability of a combination of mitomycin C, vinblastine and cisplatin in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) previously treated with chemotherapy. A total of 87 patients with MBC, most of whom had been exposed to anthracyclines (92%) and/or taxanes (29%) in the adjuvant and/or metastatic setting, were treated with mitomycin C (8 mg m(-2) day 1 cycles 1, 2, 4 and 6), vinblastine (6 mg m(-2) day 1) and cisplatin (50 mg m(-2) day 1) repeated each 21 days for a maximum of six cycles. The overall response rate (ORR) was 32% (95% CI: 22-42%) with 31% partial response (PR) and one complete response (CR). Stable disease (SD) rate was 21% (95% CI: 12-29%). There was no statistically significant difference in the ORR when MVP was given as the first-line treatment for MBC vs second or subsequent line (38 vs 30%, P=0.6), or between patients with an early (<6 months) vs late (>6 months) relapse post-anthracyclines (30 vs 52%, P=0.3). Toxicity profile was mild. This platinum-based chemotherapy is an effective, well-tolerated and low-cost regimen for patients with MBC, including those pretreated with anthracyclines.

Phase II study of irinotecan and 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin in patients with primary refractory or relapsed advanced oesophageal and gastric carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and toxicity of irinotecan and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in primary refractory or relapsed locally advanced or metastatic oesophagogastric (O-G) carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with documented progression on or within 3 months of chemotherapy were recruited between July 2000 and May 2002. Irinotecan (180 mg/m(2)) was given with 5-FU (400 mg/m(2) bolus) and leucovorin (folinic acid) (125 mg/m(2)) followed by 5-FU (1200 mg/m(2) infusion over 48 h) every 2 weeks. Response confirmed by computed tomography was assessed at 12 and 24 weeks. RESULTS: Thirty-eight of 40 registered patients (95%) were assessable. Median follow-up was 9.3 months and median age was 59.0 years. Thirty-three patients (86.8%) had metastatic disease and 37 patients (97.4%) had previously received platinum-based chemotherapy. Overall response rate was 29% (95% confidence interval 15.4% to 45.9%) while an additional 34% had stable disease. Improvement in tumour-related symptoms included dysphagia 78.6%, reflux 60.0%, pain 54.5%, anorexia 64.3% and weight loss 72.7%. Grade 3/4 toxicities were anaemia 13.2%, neutropenia 26.4%, febrile neutropenia 5.2%, stomatitis 2.6%, nausea and vomiting 13.2% and diarrhoea 7.9%. Median failure-free survival was 3.7 months and median overall survival was 6.4 months. CONCLUSION: 5-FU/irinotecan is a valuable regimen for second-line treatment in 5-FU/platinum-resistant O-G carcinoma.

Studies of the potential utility of Ki67 as a predictive molecular marker of clinical response in primary breast cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Objectives were to characterise the relationship of the proliferation marker Ki67 with response to systemic treatment in early breast cancer and to assess its clinical utility, using fine needle aspirates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Hundred and six women were treated with primary tamoxifen (n = 33), chemotherapy (n = 33) or chemotherapy and tamoxifen (n = 40). Treatment was not randomised and response was assessed clinically. Ki67 was evaluated prior to treatment and at Day 14 or 21 after commencing treatment. To assess reproducibility, Ki67 was evaluated in repeat FNAs taken from 37 untreated patients. RESULTS: The percentage change in Ki67 in first 21 days was different between responders and non-responders for patients treated with tamoxifen (p = 0.007) and chemotherapy (p = 0.005) but not for chemoendocrine treatment (p = 0.062). The reproducibility study indicated that a decrease to 36% or less of the pre-treatment Ki67 value in an individual patient was required for it to be regarded as a statistically significant change. A significant decrease in Ki67 was seen in responding patients treated with chemotherapy (p = 0.026) and chemoendocrine treatment (p = 0.041). Positive and negative predictive values for response were 85 and 59% for chemotherapy patients and 88 and 54% for chemoendocrine patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: Ki67 is unlikely to be useful as a predictive marker in individual patients. Further molecular markers that predict lack of response continue to be required.

A randomised study of protracted venous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) with or without bolus mitomycin C (MMC) in patients with carcinoma of unknown primary.

No standard regimen has been identified for patients with a carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP). This study compared protracted venous infusion 5-fluorouracil (PVI 5-FU) with or without mitomycin C (MMC) in patients with CUP in a multicentre, prospectively randomised study. 88 patients were randomised to PVI 5-FU (300 mg/m(2)/day for a maximum of 24 weeks) +/-MMC (7 mg/m(2) 6 weekly for four courses). The overall response rate was 11.6% for PVI 5-FU alone compared with 20.0% for PVI 5-FU plus MMC (P=0.29). Median failure-free survival (FFS) was 4.1 months for PVI 5-FU and 3.6 months for PVI 5-FU plus MMC (P=0.78) with an equivalent overall survival (OS) (6.6 versus 4.7 months, P=0.60). Symptomatic benefit was observed in most patients in each arm. PVI 5-FU is a well tolerated outpatient treatment regimen for patients with CUP, although the addition of MMC provides little extra benefit. PVI 5-FU may be a potential reference regimen in randomised trials with newer chemotherapy agents in patients with CUP.

A randomized pilot study of SRL172 (Mycobacterium vaccae) in patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) treated with chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: SRL172 is a suspension of heat killed Mycobacterium vaccae, that has been found to be a potent immunological adjuvant when used with autologous cells in animal models. This is a phase II study to test the clinical activity, feasibility and safety of combining SRL172 with chemotherapy to treat patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC). METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive chemotherapy with (n=14) or without (n=14) SRL172. The chemotherapy was either platinum-based (MVP, n=10) or anthracycline-based (ACE, n=18). SRL172 was given intradermally on day 0, weeks 4, 8 and then 3-6 monthly. RESULTS: The treatment arms were well balanced for disease extent (43% with limited stage in each arm). The toxicity of chemotherapy and overall response at 12-15 weeks (57%) was the same for both treatment regimens. Median survival was 8.6 months and 12.9 for patients treated with chemotherapy alone and with the combination respectively (P=0.10). The survival trend was similar for both disease extent and chemotherapy regimen employed in favour of combination chemotherapy with SRL172. CONCLUSIONS: There is a trend to improved median survival in SCLC with the combination of chemotherapy and SRL172 with no increased toxicity and irrespective of drug regimen. A phase III study examining chemotherapy in combination with SRL172 in SCLC is now underway.

Biologic markers as predictors of clinical outcome from systemic therapy for primary operable breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine whether pretreatment clinical features and molecular markers, together with changes in these factors, can predict treatment response and survival in patients with primary operable breast cancer who receive neoadjuvant therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Mitoxantrone, methotrexate (with or without mitomycin), and tamoxifen chemoendocrine therapy was administered to 158 patients before surgery. Clinical response was assessed after four cycles of treatment. Fine-needle aspiration cytology for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR), c-erbB-2, p53, bcl-2, Ki67, S-phase fraction (SPF), and ploidy were performed pretreatment and repeated on day 10 or day 21 after the first cycle of treatment. RESULTS: Good clinical response (GCR, defined as complete response or minimal residual disease) was achieved in 31% of patients (49 of 158). Tumor size, nodal disease, response, ER, PgR, c-erbB-2, p53, bcl-2, Ki67, SPF, and ploidy were analyzed as predictors of survival. By univariate analysis, node-positive disease (P =.05), lack of ER (P <.05) and PgR (P <.05), and failure to attain GCR (P =.008) were associated with a significantly increased risk of relapse. A significantly increased risk of death was associated with node-positive disease (P =.02), lack of ER expression (P =.04), and failure to attain GCR. By multivariate analysis, GCR was an independent predictor for survival (P =.05). ER expression (P =.03), absence of c-erbB-2 (P =.03), and a decrease in Ki67 on day 10 or day 21 of the first cycle (P <.05) significantly predicted for subsequent GCR. CONCLUSION: Molecular markers may be used to predict the likelihood of achieving GCR, which seems to be a valid surrogate marker for survival.

Influence of metastatic site as an additional predictor for response and outcome in advanced colorectal carcinoma.

Every year, 31,230 men and women are diagnosed with colorectal carcinoma, and up to 60% of these will ultimately develop advanced disease. However, there is little information to identify which patients are most likely to benefit from palliative chemotherapy. This analysis is unique in evaluating how the site of metastasis influences response and survival. A database of 497 patients treated within randomized clinical trials using 5-Fluorouracil (5FU)-based chemotherapy at the Royal Marsden Hospital was analysed. The potential for site of metastasis as a predictive variable for response to chemotherapy and survival was examined, in addition to other clinical parameters. The presence of liver metastases was a better predictor for overall response than either performance status or number of metastatic sites on presentation. Probability of response was significantly decreased by a raised serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and presence of peritoneal metastases. In liver metastases, a normal serum albumin was as significant a predictor for response as good performance status. The most important predictor for survival was initial performance status. The number of metastatic sites on presentation had no influence on survival. Site of metastasis can predict for response to 5FU-based chemotherapy and patients should be stratified according to the involved site of metastasis in the future.

Clinical studies of apoptosis and proliferation in breast cancer.

The interaction between cell death and cell proliferation determines the growth dynamics of all tissues. Studies are described here which relate the changes in proliferation and apoptosis that occur in human breast cancer during medical therapeutic manoeuvres. Xenograft studies strongly support the involvement of increased apoptosis as well as decreased proliferation after oestrogen withdrawal, and limited studies in clinical samples confirm the involvement of both processes. Cytotoxic chemotherapy induces increases in apoptosis within 24 h of starting treatment. However, after 3 months therapy the residual cell population shows apoptotic and proliferation indices much below pretreatment levels. Further molecular studies of this "dormant" population are important to characterise the mechanism of their resistance to drug therapy. The early changes in proliferation and apoptosis may provide useful intermediate response indices.

Local relapse in primary breast cancer patients with unexcised positive surgical margins after lumpectomy, radiotherapy and chemoendocrine therapy.

BACKGROUND: Inadequate surgical excision with residual involvement of resection margins by tumour after breast conservation results in increased local recurrence rates. To reduce this risk positive margins are, therefore, usually excised. Systemic treatment with tamoxifen or chemotherapy reduces local recurrence, along with radiotherapy. However, no studies to date have examined the correlation between chemoendocrine treatment, together with radiotherapy, and local relapse in patients with unexcised involved resection margins, having had breast conservation treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The histopathology reports were reviewed of 184 patients who were treated from June 1991 to August 1995 within our randomised study of neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemoendocrine therapy with mitozantrone and methotrexate (2M) +/- mitomycin-C (3M) and tamoxifen, used concurrently with radiation following conservation surgical treatment. Histological resection margin was considered positive if ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) or invasive carcinoma was present microscopically less than 1 mm from the excision margin. RESULTS: Although 38% of patients had unexcised microscopically involved margins, local relapse rate as first site of relapse was only 1.9% after a median follow up of 57 months. There was no difference in distant relapse (P = 0.2) and survival (P = 0.5) between the positive and negative margins groups. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of positive unexcised margins does not have a significant effect on outcome in patients who are treated with chemoendocrine therapy together with radiotherapy. Further clinical trials are required.