Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
Oral Oncol ; 153: 106833, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38729039

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The association between smoking and acute radiation toxicities of head and neck cancer (HNC) is currently unproven. The aim of the study was to compare the occurrence of acute severe toxicity between active and non-active smokers treated for HNC by radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective monocentric cohort study included patients treated by (chemo)radiotherapy for HNC from January 2021 to January 2023. Smoking status was recorded. Patients underwent a medical exam weekly during the radiotherapy to report acute toxicities according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Effects system version 5.0. Primary endpoint was the occurrence of at least one grade ≥ 3 acute toxicity among mucositis, dysphagia and dermatitis. RESULTS: Among the 102 patients included, 27.4 % were active smokers, 58.8 % were former smokers and 13.7 % had never smoked. Regarding toxicity, 23.5 % (n = 24) patients experienced severe mucositis, 37.2 % (n = 38) severe dysphagia, 13.7 % (n = 14) severe dermatitis and 54.9 % (n = 56) experienced at least one of them. Occurrence of severe acute toxicity was not statistically associated with smoking during radiotherapy (64.3 % among active smokers versus 51.3 % among non-active smokers; p = 0.24). On multivariate analysis, concurrent chemotherapy (87.5 % vs 65.2 %; OR = 5.04 [1.64-15.52]; p = 0.004) and 2.12 Gy versus 2 Gy fractionation schedule (64.3 % vs 41.3 %; OR = 2.53 [1.09-5.90]; p = 0.03) were significantly associated with severe acute toxicity. CONCLUSION: This study did not find an association between smoking during radiotherapy for HNC and occurrence of severe acute toxicities.


Subject(s)
Head and Neck Neoplasms , Humans , Male , Female , Prospective Studies , Head and Neck Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Middle Aged , Aged , Smokers/statistics & numerical data , Non-Smokers/statistics & numerical data , Deglutition Disorders/etiology , Radiation Injuries/etiology , Radiation Injuries/epidemiology , Adult
2.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 46(10): 1248-1251, 2017 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28648958

ABSTRACT

The progress made in recent years in the field of head and neck bone reconstruction is directly related to technological advancements made in computer-aided design and manufacturing (CAD/CAM) and three-dimensional printing in particular. Today these technologies are mainly used in mandibular reconstruction to manufacture aids for harvesting and shaping bone flaps. However problems remain when addressing patients with a contraindication to microsurgery who need extensive bone reconstruction. For these patients who cannot benefit from vascularized bone grafts, surgeons have to find alternative solutions aimed at maintaining best function and aesthetics. The goal of this article is to present an original method for mandibular body replacement with custom-made porous titanium prostheses in patients ineligible for a bone free flap. This solution has been used for two patients with an intraoral approach, resulting in no visible scars, with simple postoperative care of a short duration. This innovative solution represents an additional option for the treatment of complex mandibular reconstructions.


Subject(s)
Ameloblastoma/surgery , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/surgery , Mandibular Neoplasms/surgery , Mandibular Reconstruction/instrumentation , Maxillofacial Prosthesis Implantation/methods , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Male , Middle Aged , Porosity , Prosthesis Design , Titanium , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
3.
Ann Chir Plast Esthet ; 61(4): 292-7, 2016 Aug.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26497269

ABSTRACT

Carcinological head and neck reconstruction still remains a challenge due to the volume and varied tissues needed. Large and wide oromandibular defects require, not just the bone but also soft tissues for the pelvilingual reconstruction and therefore, a second free flap may become necessary in addition to a fibular flap. The option of an unique chimeric flap based on the fibular artery and its branches is less known whereas it offers the advantage of a unique flap with bone, muscle and multiple skin paddles, independent of each other. The aim of this technical note is to present step by step the surgical procedure of this chimeric flap and share this method that avoids a second free flap.


Subject(s)
Fibula/transplantation , Free Tissue Flaps , Head and Neck Neoplasms/surgery , Mandible/surgery , Plastic Surgery Procedures , Fibula/blood supply , Humans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...