Stent-grafting of a dissected aortic arch and descending aorta after debranching of the supra-aortic vessels: case-presentation, indications, technique.

Endovascular repair of thoracic aorta pathology is emerging as the preferred treatment strategy in high risk patients. Hybrid techniques with debranching of the supra-aortic vessels extend indications for endovascular repair of the aortic arch and descending aorta. After a brief case-presentation, we describe these procedures, outline the indications and discuss the outcomes and results available in present literature.

Endovascular treatment of acute aortic isthmic rupture: concerning midterm results.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated midterm results of endovascular management of traumatic aortic isthmic ruptures. METHODS: Between 2001 and 2008, 10 patients (seven males, mean age 38 years) underwent endovascular treatment of an acute aortic rupture. Eight procedures were emergent, with four cases of hemodynamic instability with Glasgow scores of 3, 5, and 7. Associated traumas were severe brain, liver, and pelvic bone injuries. All procedures were performed with transoesophageal echocardiography monitoring. We used two AneuRx and nine Medtronic Talent or Valiant stent grafts. RESULTS: All patients survived their traumatic isthmic rupture. In nine patients, stent-graft deployment was successful. One patient experienced a distal migration needing a laparotomy and deployment of an additional new thoracic stent graft. The mean intensive care unit stay was 48 hr (range 24-168). The mean hospital stay was 11 days (range 8-43). All patients were controlled clinically and by contrast computed tomography (CT) according to the EUROSTAR protocol. There were no endoleaks, stent graft-related complications, or late deaths during a mean follow-up of 49 months. The control CT showed a lack of apposition of the proximal part of the stent graft at the inner curve of the aortic arch in three patients. CONCLUSION: The midterm results of endovascular treatment of acute traumatic aortic isthmic rupture are encouraging and compare favorably to the surgical approach. Late follow-up is required to exclude possible stent-graft complications, especially in young patients with angulated aortic arches.

Stump pressure and somatosensory evoked potentials for predicting the use of shunt during carotid surgery.

The aim of this study is to compare measurement of stump pressure (SP) and somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP) made during carotid surgery as criteria upon which to base the decision whether or not to use a shunt. We included 288 patients who underwent for carotid surgery under general anaesthesia. We performed 247 endarterectomies with patch closure (85.7%), 25 carotid transsection with reimplantation (8.7%), and 16 carotid bypasses (5.6%). SSEP monitoring showed no modification in 225/288 patients (78.1%), moderate modification in 32/288 patients (11.1%), and severe modification in 31/288 patients (10.8%). Shunt was used if there was moderate or severe SSEP modification in response to carotid clamping, which represents 63 patients in our series. A shunt was used in 47/288 patients (16.3%). In 16 patients, despite SSEP modifications, the shunt was not used because these SSEP modifications occurred only in the last minutes of the procedure just before off clamping the carotid. The mean SP for all patients was 51 mm Hg. In the shunted patients, the mean SP was 33 mm Hg. Variation of SP was correlated with the SSEP modifications. There was just one perioperative stroke in this series (1/288 = 0.3%). We concluded that the threshold of SP below which shunting is indicated in our study was 44 mm Hg with 81% sensibility and 68% specificity.

Ischemic cerebral lesions after carotid surgery and carotid stenting.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the risk of new ischemic cerebral lesions after carotid endarterectomy and carotid stenting and their clinical significance. METHODS: Prospective and non-randomized single-center study including 121 patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic significant carotid stenosis. 60 patients were treated by surgery and 61 treated by carotid stenting. Stenting was restricted to patients at high risk for surgery. Neurological examination and Diffusion-Weighted Cerebral Magnetic Resonance (DW-MRI) were performed before and after each procedure. The presence, location and volume of new cerebral lesions were determined. RESULTS: In the surgical group, 2 minor strokes were registered. DW-MRI showed new lesions in 7 patients (11.6%). All except one were located in the ipsilateral anterior circulation. In the stenting group, 1 minor stroke and 1 occurrence of quadranopsia were registered. DW-MRI showed new lesions in 26 patients (42.6%). 10 of these patients (38.4%) had lesions in the contralateral hemisphere and 7 patients (26.9%) in the posterior circulation. Deficits are found in patients with higher lesion volumes. CONCLUSIONS: Cerebral ischemic lesions are significantly (p<0.0001) more frequent after carotid stenting than after endarterectomy. The majority of these lesions have no immediate clinical implication, but more specific tests are needed to evaluate their exact significance.

Intra-operative acute leg ischaemia after free fibula flap harvest for mandible reconstruction.

Osteosarcomas of the cranial bones need a large surgical radical resection. The best option to reconstruct mandible defect after resection is the free fibula flap. In our patient an acute ischaemic leg occurred just after the free fibula flap harvest for mandible reconstruction. The abnormal distribution of the calf arteries leads to catastrophic consequences. The peroneal artery could be the main dominant artery of the leg in a small number of patients. We reported an extremely rare case of "peronea magna", described in less than 0.2% of the global population. A careful pre-operative workup of the calf vessels is required in all the patients who need free fibula flap harvest.

Functional classification of aortic root/valve abnormalities and their correlation with etiologies and surgical procedures.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Patients with aortic root pathology may benefit from 'valve-conservation' surgery although application of this philosophy is limited by a lack of 'standardized' surgical techniques. A functional classification of aortic root and valvular abnormalities has been developed in 260 patients and correlated with the etiology of the pathologic process and the surgical procedure performed. Early outcome was assessed using hospital records and medium-term follow-up by cardiological review. RECENT FINDINGS: From January 1995 until March 2001, 260 patients were operated on for aortic root pathology using valve-conserving surgical techniques. Hospital mortality was 2%; intra-operative echocardiography showed residual aortic regurgitation (Grade 1-2) in 11%, none in the remaining patients. Follow-up at a mean of 20 months (87% of patients) showed trivial or Grade 1 aortic regurgitation in 80%. SUMMARY: Application of a simple functional classification for aortic root pathology and aortic valve disease allows the logical application of 'valve-conserving' surgical procedures with excellent early and medium-term results.

Repair of aortic valve prolapse: experience with 44 patients.

OBJECTIVES: In regurgitant tricuspid aortic valves, cusp prolapse may be isolated or associated with dilatation of the proximal aorta. Newly appearing cusp prolapse can also appear after an aortic valve sparing operation (AVSO) and be responsible for residual aortic regurgitation. In this report, we describe our experience in repairing prolapsing aortic cusps in 44 patients with aortic regurgitation. METHODS: Between 1996 and 2003, 260 patients had aortic valve repair or valve sparing procedures in our department. All patients had peri-operative TEE. Prolapse of one or more of the aortic cusps was identified by TEE and confirmed by careful surgical inspection before and after valve sparing surgery. Forty-four patients with cusp prolapse were identified. Fifteen had an isolated prolapse, with a normal root (group I), 18 had cusp prolapse associated with dilatation of the proximal aorta (group IIa), and 11 had a newly appearing prolapse after AVSO (group IIb). Correction of the prolapsing cusp was achieved by either free edge plication, triangular resection or resuspension with PTFE. This procedure was associated with an aortic annuloplasty in group I, and with AVSO in groups II and III. RESULTS: Post-operative TEE showed AR trivial or grade I regurgitation. At a mean of 23 months follow-up, one patient with recurrent regurgitation required an aortic valve replacement with a homograft. All remaining patients were in NYHA class I or II. Echocardiography confirmed the durability of the valve repair. CONCLUSIONS: Among the common causes of aortic regurgitation, isolated cusp prolapse is frequent and is amenable to surgical repair with excellent mid-term results. In particular, in patents who are potential candidates for AVSO, identification and correction of an associated prolapse, either pre-existing or secondary to the AVSO procedure, may further extend the indications for this technique, increase its success rates and improve its long-term outcome.