Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Appl Physiol (1985) ; 110(1): 176-87, 2011 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21071586

ABSTRACT

The mechanical properties of the aorta affect cardiac function and are related to cardiovascular morbidity/mortality. This study was designed to evaluate the isotropic (mainly elastin, elastin(iso)) and anisotropic (mainly collagen, collagen(ani)) material parameters within the human aorta in vivo. Thirty healthy men and women in three different age categories (23-30, 41-54, and 67-72 yr) were included. A novel mechanical model was used to identify the mechanical properties and the strain field with aid of simultaneously recorded pressure and radius in the abdominal aorta. The magnitudes of the material parameters relating to both the stiffness of elastin(iso) and collagen(ani) were in agreement with earlier in vitro studies. The load-bearing fraction attributed to collagen(ani) oscillated from 10 to 30% between diastolic and systolic pressures during the cardiac cycle. With age, stiffness of elastin(iso) increased in men, despite the decrease in elastin content that has been found due to elastolysis. Furthermore, an increase in stiffness of collagen(ani) at high physiological pressure was found. This might be due to increased glycation, as well as changed isoforms of collagen in the aortic wall with age. A marked sex difference was observed, with a much less age-related effect, both on elastin(iso) and collagen(ani) stiffness in women. Possible factors of importance could be the effect of sex hormones, as well as differing collagen isoforms, between the sexes.


Subject(s)
Aging/physiology , Aorta, Abdominal/physiology , Collagen/physiology , Elastin/physiology , Adult , Aged , Elastic Modulus/physiology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Sex Factors , Stress, Mechanical , Young Adult
2.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg ; 33(5): 592-8, 2007 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17164093

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Most risk factors are similar for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) and atherosclerosis, e.g. smoking, male gender, age, high blood pressure, hyperlipidemia. Diabetes mellitus however, is a risk factor for atherosclerosis, but diabetic patients seldom develop AAA. The reason for this discrepancy is unknown. Increased aortic wall stress seems to be an etiologic factor in the formation, growth and rupture of AAA in man. The aim of our study was to study the wall stress in the abdominal aorta in diabetic patients compared with healthy controls. METHODS: 39 patients with diabetes mellitus and 46 age - and sex matched healthy subjects were examined with B-mode ultrasound to determine the lumen diameter (LD) and intima-media thickness (IMT) in the abdominal aorta (AA) and the common carotid artery (CCA). Diastolic blood pressure (DBP) was measured non-invasively in the brachial artery. LaPlace law was used to calculate circumferential wall stress. RESULTS: Age, DBP, and LD in the abdominal aorta were not significantly different in the diabetic patients compared to controls. IMT in the AA was larger in the diabetic patients, 0.89+/-0.17 vs 0.73+/-0.11 mm (p<.001). Accordingly aortic wall stress was reduced in the diabetics, 7.8+/-1.7 x 10(5) vs 9.7+/-1.9 x 10(5)dynes/cm(2) (p<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Wall stress in the abdominal aorta is reduced in diabetes mellitus. This is mainly due to a thicker aortic wall compared to healthy controls. The reduced aortic wall stress coincides with the fact that epidemiological studies have shown a decreased risk of aneurysm development in diabetic patients.


Subject(s)
Aorta, Abdominal/physiopathology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/physiopathology , Endothelium, Vascular/physiopathology , Adult , Aged , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/epidemiology , Biomechanical Phenomena , Blood Pressure , Carotid Artery, Common/pathology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/epidemiology , Diabetic Angiopathies/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Tunica Intima/pathology , Tunica Media/pathology
3.
Diabetologia ; 48(4): 780-3, 2005 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15747108

ABSTRACT

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: We have previously reported that women, not men, with type 1 diabetes have increased aortic stiffness. Increased arterial stiffness may explain why diabetic women have a particularly high risk of developing cardiovascular complications. We have now followed up our previously investigated patients after 7 years, with a view to evaluating whether the sex difference was persistent, and also evaluating the degree of progression with time and the relationship between stiffness versus intima media thickness of the aorta. METHODS: Stiffness (beta) of the abdominal aorta (echo-tracking sonography) and intima media thickness (B-mode ultrasound) were assessed in 23 women and 19 men with type 1 diabetes and compared with matched healthy individuals. RESULTS: At follow-up, aortic stiffness was still higher (60%) (p=0.0016) in diabetic than in control women, whereas there was no similar difference (p=0.4) between diabetic and control men. No progression of stiffness had occurred over the 7 years. At follow-up, the intima media thickness was increased and the internal diameter of the aorta was decreased in diabetic men and women without any sex-related difference. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: The increased aortic stiffness that affects type 1 diabetic patients seems to be an early event that soon reaches a plateau without any further increase. Increased aortic stiffness in type 1 diabetic women seems to be a sex-specific functional disorder unrelated to the degree of underlying atherosclerosis.


Subject(s)
Aorta/pathology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/complications , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aorta/diagnostic imaging , Compliance , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/mortality , Elasticity , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Sex Factors , Sound Spectrography , Survival Rate , Tunica Intima/pathology , Tunica Media/pathology , Ultrasonography , Vascular Diseases/etiology , Vascular Diseases/mortality , Vascular Diseases/pathology
4.
J Vasc Surg ; 39(4): 836-42, 2004 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15071452

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The popliteal artery is, after the aorta, the most common site for aneurysm formation. Why the popliteal artery is more susceptible than other peripheral muscular arteries is unknown. An important factor may be differences in arterial wall composition as compared with other peripheral muscular arteries, which in turn affect wall properties. These are however unknown. We studied the mechanical wall properties of the popliteal artery in healthy subjects. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An ultrasound echo-tracking system was used to measure pulsatile changes in popliteal diameter in 108 healthy subjects (56 female, 52 male; age range, 9-82 years). In combination with blood pressure, stiffness (beta), strain, cross-sectional artery wall compliance coefficient (CC), and distensibility coefficient (DC) were calculated. Intima-media thickness (IMT) was registered with a Philips P700 ultrasound scanner. RESULTS: The popliteal diameter increased with age, and was larger in male subjects than in female subjects (P<.001). Fractional diameter change (strain) decreased with age (P<.001), and strain values were lower in male subjects than in female subjects (P<.01). Accordingly, stiffness increased with age (P<.001), with higher stiffness values in male subjects (P<.01). DC decreased with age (P<.001), with lower DC values in male subjects (P<.01). CC decreased with age, with no difference between genders (P<.001). IMT increased with age (P<.001), with higher IMT values in male subjects (P<.001). The increase in IMT did not affect distensibility. CONCLUSION: The wall properties of the popliteal artery are affected by age and gender, not only with an increase in diameter, but also with an age-related decrease in distensibility, with male subjects having lower distensibility than in female subjects. This seems not to be the behavior of a true muscular artery, but of a central elastic artery, such as the aorta, and might have implications for susceptibility to arterial dilatation, as well as the association of aneurysm formation between the aorta and the popliteal artery. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The popliteal artery is, after the abdominal aorta, the most common location for aneurysm formation in the arterial system. Why it is more susceptible than other arteries is unknown. This study shows that the wall function of the popliteal artery differs from other peripheral arteries, and instead show striking similarities to the abdominal aorta, indicating that the functional arrangement of arterial wall components are similar in the two arteries. This may have implications for the susceptibility to aneurysm formation, as well as the association of dilating disease between the popliteal artery and the abdominal aorta.


Subject(s)
Popliteal Artery , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aneurysm , Biomechanical Phenomena , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Popliteal Artery/anatomy & histology , Popliteal Artery/diagnostic imaging , Popliteal Artery/physiology , Sex Factors , Ultrasonography
5.
Ultrasound Med Biol ; 27(2): 181-8, 2001 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11316526

ABSTRACT

The distensibility of elastic arteries has been extensively studied, while studies of muscular arteries are sparse. The influences of age and gender on the mechanical properties of the common femoral artery (CFA) were studied. The pulsatile diameter changes of the CFA were noninvasively measured using echo-tracking sonography in 173 healthy volunteers (95 females, 78 males, range 7-81 years). In combination with blood pressure measurements, stiffness (beta) and pressure strain elastic modulus (Ep) were calculated. Neither beta nor Ep was related to age or gender and a considerable interindividual variation was present. The CFA diameter increased with age. In conclusion, the distensibility of this muscular artery is not clearly affected by age or gender, although the diameter increases with age. This indicates remodelling of the arterial wall and an impact of vascular smooth muscles on long-term wall mechanics. Thus, there appear to be fundamental differences in the dynamic behaviour of the common femoral artery when compared to elastic arteries, such as the aorta and the common carotid artery.


Subject(s)
Femoral Artery/diagnostic imaging , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Blood Pressure Determination , Child , Elasticity , Female , Femoral Artery/anatomy & histology , Femoral Artery/physiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Sex Factors , Statistics, Nonparametric , Ultrasonography
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...