Malignant gastrointestinal neuroectodermal tumor presenting with small intestinal obstruction: A case report.

Malignant gastrointestinal neuroectodermal tumors (GNETs) are rare malignant mesenchymal neoplasms. To our knowledge, only 99 cases have been reported worldwide. The tumor has an aggressive malignancy, with a rapid progression. The histological features of GNET overlap with those of clear cell sarcoma, which contain Ewing sarcoma breakpoint region 1 mutation. GNETs lack melanocyte-specific markers, while clear cell sarcoma exhibits melanocytic differentiation. Various symptoms have been reported previously, and the most reported lesion is in the small bowel. The patient was a 69-year-old man who presented with abdominal pain and vomiting. Computed tomography revealed a nodule in the small bowel, which induced small intestinal obstruction. Enteroscopic images revealed a submucosal tumor. Surgery was performed, and the patient was diagnosed with GNET. Only two patients whose primary lesions were in the small intestine, including the patient in this report, have undergone enteroscopy before surgery. This is a rare case of GNET in which a patient underwent enteroscopy before surgical treatment.

Subset Analysis of a Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare Magnifying Chromoendoscopy with Endoscopic Ultrasonography for Stage Diagnosis of Early Stage Colorectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Our recent prospective study found equivalent accuracy of magnifying chromoendoscopy (MC) and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) for diagnosing the invasion depth of colorectal cancer (CRC); however, whether these tools show diagnostic differences in categories such as tumor size and morphology remains unclear. Hence, we conducted detailed subset analysis of the prospective data. METHODS: In this multicenter, prospective, comparative trial, a total of 70 patients with early, flat CRC were enrolled from February 2011 to December 2012, and the results of 66 lesions were finally analyzed. Patients were randomly allocated to primary MC followed by EUS or to primary EUS followed by MC. Diagnoses of invasion depth by each tool were divided into intramucosal to slight submucosal invasion (invasion depth <1000 µm) and deep submucosal invasion (invasion depth ≥1000 µm), and then compared with the final pathological diagnosis by an independent pathologist blinded to clinical data. To standardize diagnoses among examiners, this trial was started after achievement of a mean κ value of ≥0.6 which was calculated from the average of κ values between each pair of participating endoscopists. RESULTS: Both MC and EUS showed similar diagnostic outcomes, with no significant differences in prediction of invasion depth in subset analyses according to tumor size, location, and morphology. Lesions that were consistently diagnosed as Tis/T1-SMS or ≥T1-SMD with both tools revealed accuracy of 76-78%. Accuracy was low in borderline lesions with irregular pit pattern in MC and distorted findings of the third layer in EUS (MC, 58.5%; EUS, 50.0%). CONCLUSIONS: MC and EUS showed the same limited accuracy for predicting invasion depth in all categories of early CRC. Since the irregular pit pattern in MC, distorted findings to the third layer in EUS and inconsistent diagnosis between both tools were associated with low accuracy, further refinements or even novel methods are still needed for such lesions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: University hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry UMIN 000005085.

Magnifying chromoendoscopy and endoscopic ultrasonography measure invasion depth of early stage colorectal cancer with equal accuracy on the basis of a prospective trial.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Magnifying chromoendoscopy (MC) and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) are used to estimate the depth of colorectal cancer (CRC) invasion, but it is not clear which procedure is more accurate. We performed a prospective study to compare MC and EUS. METHODS: A total of 70 patients with an early stage flat CRC lesion were enrolled at 6 institutions in Japan and randomly assigned to groups assessed by MC followed by EUS or EUS followed by MC. Results from MC and EUS measurements of 66 lesions were included in the final analysis. The invasion depth of each lesion was measured by each procedure and categorized as mucosal to slight submucosal (depth <1000 µm) or deep submucosal (depth ≥ 1000 µm); measurements were compared with the final diagnosis on the basis of the pathology analysis. All participating examiners achieved a mean κ value ≥ 0.6 for both MC and EUS before this trial. RESULTS: MC and EUS each measured the depth of lesion invasion with 71.2% accuracy (correctly for 47 of 66 lesions). MC identified lesions with deep submucosal invasion with 74.2% sensitivity and 68.6% specificity, whereas EUS identified them with 67.7% sensitivity and 74.3% specificity. The differences between MC and EUS measurements did not differ significantly. However, MC required significantly shorter observation time than EUS (361.7 ± 164.5 seconds vs 451.2 ± 209.4 seconds, P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: MC and EUS are equally accurate in estimating the invasion depth of early stage CRC lesions. However, neither procedure has sufficient diagnostic accuracy to be used as the standard. University Hospital Medical Network Clinical Trials Registry, Number: UMIN 000005085.

[A case of gastric cancer with peritoneal dissemination who achieved long survival from control of ascites for over 2 years by successive treatments with S-1 in combination with docetaxel as first-line followed by irinotecan in combination with cisplatin as second-line].

The patient was a 66-year-old male, admitted and diagnosed as having advanced gastric cancer with peritoneal dissemination, leading to ascites and obstructive jaundice. After reducing the degree of obstructive jaundice, combination chemotherapy of S-1 80mg/m2/day(2 weeks administration and 1 week rest)and docetaxel(TXT)40mg/m2(day 1)was administered from February, 2008. After 3 courses of this regimen, CT revealed no evidence of ascites, and this chemotherapy was successively continued on an outpatient basis until June, 2009. After the relapse of ascites from July, 2009, combination chemotherapy of irinotecan(CPT-11)60mg/m2 and cisplatin(CDDP)30mg/m2 biweekly was performed as second-line chemotherapy, and the ascites disappeared again after around 2 courses of this regimen. This chemotherapy was continued on an outpatient basis until February, 2010. No major adverse reaction to either chemotherapy was observed. This case suggests that these chemotherapies, such as the combination chemotherapy of S-1 plus TXT as a first-line treatment and CPT-11 plus CDDP as the following second-line treatment, can be administered to an outpatient, can keep good patient's QOL and can be one of the effective chemotherapy options for advanced gastric cancer with peritoneal dissemination.