Use of sealants in pancreatic surgery: critical appraisal of the literature.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Fibrin sealants containing both fibrin and thrombin have been used to control bleeding, reinforce suture lines and enhance tissue healing. However, the literature provides contradictory results. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed to determine the use of fibrin sealants in pancreatic surgery. These articles were then critically appraised according to their methodologies, outcomes and conclusions. RESULTS: Twenty-four studies were found, including 6 controlled randomized trials. Of these, 16 studies were analyzed. Many methodological flaws and lack of consistency in definitions were found, making comparisons between studies difficult if not impossible. CONCLUSION: Because of the heterogeneity and lack of high-level evidence, the current literature does not allow us any conclusion: neither is there proof that fibrin sealants are of any real utility in pancreatic surgery, nor that they do not work. Further large-scale controlled trials are necessary before concluding that they do or do not provide any advantages in pancreatic surgery.

Anastomotic leakage after elective right versus left colectomy for cancer: prevalence and independent risk factors.

BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery remains a major challenge because of its early and late consequences. STUDY DESIGN: To determine whether prevalence and risk factors for anastomotic leakage (AL) differed between right and left elective colectomy for cancer, we conducted univariate and multivariate analyses and compared 33 variables (15 preoperative, 18 intraoperative) culled prospectively for 520 right and 1,230 left colectomies, followed by immediate anastomosis in 1,750 adult patients with or without AL. RESULTS: The overall AL rate was 4% (71 of 1,750) and was significantly lower (p < 0.0001) for right (7 of 520=1.35%) than for left colectomy (64 of 1,230=5.20%). Overall mortality was 4.1% (68 of 1,750), and was not statistically different (p=0.50) between right (4.6%, 24 of 520) and left (3.6%, 44 of 1,230)) colectomy. In right colectomy, differences in associated mortality rates with (14.3%, 1 of 7) and without (4.5%, 23 of 513) AL were not statistically significant (p=0.28), but in left colectomy, associated mortality was statistically significantly higher (p < 0.006) with AL (10.9%, 7 of 64) than without it (3.2%, 37 of 1,166). Independent risk factors for AL were preoperative in right colectomy: loss of weight (> 10%), odds ratio (OR)=5.62, with 95% CI 1.06 to 29.8; and intraoperative in left colectomy: palliative resection (OR=2.12; 95% CI 1.06 to 4.23), "poor" colonic cleanliness (OR=2.4; 95% CI 1.34 to 4.28), proximal colorectal anastomosis (OR=1.34; 95% CI 1 to 1.8), and distal colorectal anastomosis (OR=3.91; 95% CI 1.64 to 9.81). CONCLUSIONS: In right colectomy for cancer, preoperative nutritive support leading to regain of lost weight could reduce postoperative morbidity. Concerning left colectomy, if colonic cleanliness is poor, intraoperative colonic lavage should be done. When poor colonic cleanliness is associated with palliative resection and low distal rectal anastomosis, a protective stoma should be considered.

Laparoscopic approach to colonic cancer: critical appraisal of the literature.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: As laparoscopic colectomy finds its place in the surgical armamentarium, the literature concerning the safety, efficacy, and oncological rational for treatment of colonic cancer is also enriched. A review and critical appraisal of the literature on this subject was the aim of this paper. METHODS: A systematic research and a hand search were conducted to gain access to all controlled studies involving laparoscopic colectomy using the Medline, Embase, HealthSTAR, Cumulative Index for Nursing and Allied Health Literature, CancerLit data bases and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for the years 1991-2006. RESULTS: Over 40 controlled randomized trials and ten systematic reviews and/or meta-analyses were found. Several of the completed controlled randomized trials have published either short- or long-term results; only partial and short-term results are available in rectal cancer. The principal conclusions are that the laparoscopic approach affords better short-term outcomes including surgical site morbidity, but with increased operative times and direct costs. Among the proven long-term outcomes, cancer recurrence and survival do not seem to be worse. Whether conversion, a source of increased operative time and costs, is responsible for poorer outcomes or whether specific settings associated with poorer outcomes are among the causes of conversion remains to be shown. However, there are still concerns as regards specific laparoscopic-related complications. CONCLUSION: There seems to no real safety problems in performing laparoscopic colectomy for cancer; improvement in operative times, conversion rates, and complications should make laparoscopy the best cost-effective approach to colectomy.