The utility of the MELD score in predicting mortality following liver resection for metastasis.

BACKGROUND: The MELD score has been demonstrated to be predictive of hepatectomy outcomes in mixed patient samples of primary and secondary liver cancers. Because MELD is a measure of hepatic dysfunction, prior conclusions may rely on the high prevalence of cirrhosis observed with primary lesions. This study aims to evaluate MELD score as a predictor of mortality and develop a risk prediction model for patients specifically undergoing hepatic metastasectomy. METHODS: ACS-NSQIP 2005-2013 was analyzed to select patients who had undergone liver resections for metastases. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis determined the MELD score most associated with 30-day mortality. A literature review identified variables that impact hepatectomy outcomes. Significant factors were included in a multivariable analysis (MVA). A risk calculator was derived from the final multivariable model. RESULTS: Among the 14,919 patients assessed, the mortality rate was 2.7%, and the median MELD was 7.3 (range = 34.4). A MELD of 7.24 was identified by ROC (sensitivity = 81%, specificity = 51%, c-statistic = 0.71). Of all patients above this threshold, 4.4% died at 30 days vs. 1.1% in the group ≤7.24. This faction represented 50.1% of the population but accounted for 80.3% of all deaths (p < 0.001). The MVA revealed mortality to be increased 2.6-times (OR = 2.55, 95%CI 1.69-3.84, p < 0.001). A risk calculator was successfully developed and validated. CONCLUSIONS: MELD>7.24 is an important predictor of death following hepatectomy for metastasis and may prompt a detailed assessment with the provided risk calculator. Attention to MELD in the preoperative setting will improve treatment planning and patient education prior to oncologic liver resection.

Bioavailability of medication delivered via nasogastric tube is decreased in the immediate postoperative period.

BACKGROUND: A study was performed to determine bioavailability of medication delivered via nasogastric tube in patients after abdominal surgery. METHODS: Acetaminophen (20 mg/kg) was administered to each patient per os at least 48 hours prior to abdominal surgery and via nasogastric tube 3 hours postoperatively. The nasogastric tube was clamped for 30 minutes after drug administration, prior to resuming suction. Serum levels of acetaminophen were measured 0, 40, and 90 minutes after each dose. RESULTS: Acetaminophen levels were significantly lower (P < 0.001) when the drug was administered via nasogastric tube postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Decreased bioavailability of medications delivered via nasogastric tube may have important clinical implications and should be taken into consideration during the postoperative period.

Is hemoglobin level alone a reliable predictor of outcome in the severely anemic surgical patient?

The relationship between outcome and hemoglobin (Hgb), oxygen extraction ratio (ER), history of cardiac, renal, pulmonary, and/or hepatic disease, diabetes, malignancy, sepsis, hypertension, and active bleeding was analyzed in 47 patients with severe anemia (Hgb less than 7.0 gm/dl, mean = 4.6 +/- .2 gm/dl) to evaluate the effect of Hgb on survival and to look for other predictors of outcome. All patients had refused blood transfusion on religious grounds and were participants in a randomized, controlled study of the blood substitute Fluosol DA-20 per cent. Patients were analyzed as a group and after stratifying by Hgb into four levels: (Hgb less than 3.0 gm/dl, N = 7; Hgb less than 3.5 gm/dl, N = 12; Hgb less than 4.0 gm/dl, N = 17; Hgb less than 4.5 gm/dl, N = 23) and by ER into two levels of less than 50 per cent and greater than 50 per cent. Only Hgb, ER, sepsis and active bleeding were predictors of outcome, with sepsis being the only significant, independent predictor of outcome at all levels (P less than .01). Active bleeding was a predictor for levels of Hgb below 4.0 gm/dl. Hgb level alone was a significant predictor only at levels below 3 gm/dl (P less than .05). Extraction ratio interacted with Hgb only below 3 gm/dl (P less than .05). Multiple independent factors influence outcome in the severely anemic patient, the strongest being sepsis and active bleeding. Prevention of sepsis and early intervention to stop bleeding should improve survival in the patient who refuses transfusion.

Hemoductal pancreatitis.

Gastrointestinal tract hemorrhage from rupture of the splenic artery into the pancreatic duct is unusual. This obscure cause of intermittent gastrointestinal tract bleeding should be suspected when the more common causes of bleeding have been ruled out. Duodenoscopy carried out during active hemorrhage may reveal blood coming from the papilla of Vater. Coeliac arteriography will show the pathognomonic findings and confirm the diagnosis. We have treated three patients who had chronic pancreatitis and who developed pseudocyst formation and pseudoaneurysms of the splenic artery. The pseudoaneurysm ruptured into the duct of Wirsung, causing obscure upper-gastrointestinal bleeding. Treatment was distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy, including the pseudoaneurysm and pseudocyst. A review of the literature suggests that three different types of bleeding into the pancreatic duct can occur. The cause of each is described.