Rationale and Design of the SOTA-P-CARDIA Trial (ATRU-V): Sotagliflozin in HFpEF Patients Without Diabetes.

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is now the most common form of heart failure (HF). This syndrome is associated with an elevated morbi-mortality, and effective therapies are urgently needed. Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) are the first pharmacological class that has demonstrated to reduce hospitalization and cardiovascular mortality in large clinical trials in HFpEF. Furthermore, the dual SGLT 1/2 inhibitor sotagliflozin has shown a reduction in cardiovascular outcomes in diabetic HF patients, regardless of ejection fraction Sotagliflozin on Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Post Worsening Heart Failure (SOLOIST-WHF) Trial, and prevents the development of HF in patients with diabetes and chronic kidney disease Sotagliflozin on Cardiovascular and Renal Events in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Moderate Renal Impairment Who Are at Cardiovascular Risk (SCORED) trial. The major objective of the Sotagliflozin in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction Patients (SOTA-P-CARDIA) trial (NCT05562063) is to investigate whether the observed cardiorenal benefits of sotagliflozin in HF patients with diabetes can be extended to a non-diabetic population. The SOTA-P-CARDIA is a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study that will randomize non-diabetic patients with the universal definition of HFpEF (ejection fraction > 50% assessed the day of randomization). Qualifying patients will be randomized, in blocks of 4, to receive either sotagliflozin or placebo for a period of 6 months. The primary outcome is changes in left ventricular mass by cardiac magnetic resonance from randomization to end of the study between the groups. Secondary end points include changes in peak VO2; myocardial mechanics, interstitial myocardial fibrosis, and volume of epicardial adipose tissue; distance in the 6-min walk test; and quality of life. Finally, the authors expect that this trial will help to clarify the potential benefits of the use of sotagliflozin in non-diabetic HFpEF patients.

Mechanistic Insights of Empagliflozin in Nondiabetic Patients With HFrEF: From the EMPA-TROPISM Study.

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to evaluate the effect of empagliflozin, in addition to optimal medical treatment, on epicardial adipose tissue (EAT), interstitial myocardial fibrosis, and aortic stiffness in nondiabetic patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). BACKGROUND: Several randomized clinical trials have established the benefits of the inhibitors of the sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 receptor (SGLT2-i) in HFrEF, independent of their hypoglycemic effects. The mechanisms of the benefits of SGLT2-i in HFrEF have not been well defined. METHODS: This study was a secondary analysis of patients enrolled in the EMPA-TROPISM [ATRU-4] (Are the cardiac benefits of Empagliflozin independent of its hypoglycemic activity?) clinical trial. It was a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial investigating the effect of empagliflozin in nondiabetic patients with HFrEF. Patients underwent cardiac magnetic resonance at baseline and after 6 months. Interstitial myocardial fibrosis was calculated by using T1 mapping (extracellular volume). Aortic stiffness was calculated by using pulsed wave velocity, and EAT was measured from the cine sequences. RESULTS: Empagliflozin is associated with significant reductions in EAT volume (-5.14 mL; 95% CI: -8.36 to -1.92) compared with placebo (-0.75 mL; 95% CI: -3.57 to 2.06; P < 0.05); this finding was paralleled by reductions in subcutaneous adipose tissue area (-5.33 cm2 [95% CI: -12.61 to 1.95] vs 9.13 cm2 [95% CI: -2.72 to 20.99]; P < 0.05). Empagliflozin-treated patients reported a reduction in extracellular volume (-1.25% [±0.56 95% CI] vs 0.24% [±0.57 95% CI]; (P < 0.01)]; specifically, empagliflozin reduced both matrix volume (-7.24 mL [95% CI: -11.59 to -2.91] vs 0.70 mL [95% CI: -0.89 to 2.29]; P < 0.001) and cardiomyocyte volume (-11.08 mL [95% CI: -19.62 to -2.55] vs 0.80 mL [95% CI: -1.96 to 3.55]; P < 0.05). Pulsed wave velocity was also significantly reduced in the empagliflozin group (-0.58 cm/s [95% CI: -0.92 to -0.25] vs 0.60 cm/s [95% CI: 0.14 to 1.06]; P < 0.01). Using proteomics, empagliflozin was associated with a significant reduction in inflammatory biomarkers. CONCLUSIONS: Empagliflozin significantly improved adiposity, interstitial myocardial fibrosis, aortic stiffness, and inflammatory markers in nondiabetic patients with HFrEF. These results shed new light on the mechanisms of action of the benefits of SGLT2-i. (Are the "Cardiac Benefits" of Empagliflozin Independent of Its Hypoglycemic Activity [ATRU-4] [EMPA-TROPISM]; NCT03485222).

Randomized Trial of Empagliflozin in Nondiabetic Patients With Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction.

BACKGROUND: Large clinical trials established the benefits of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors in patients with diabetes and with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The early and significant improvement in clinical outcomes is likely explained by effects beyond a reduction in hyperglycemia. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of empagliflozin on left ventricular (LV) function and volumes, functional capacity, and quality of life (QoL) in nondiabetic HFrEF patients. METHODS: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, nondiabetic HFrEF patients (n = 84) were randomized to empagliflozin 10 mg daily or placebo for 6 months. The primary endpoint was change in LV end-diastolic and -systolic volume assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance. Secondary endpoints included changes in LV mass, LV ejection fraction, peak oxygen consumption in the cardiopulmonary exercise test, 6-min walk test, and quality of life. RESULTS: Empagliflozin was associated with a significant reduction of LV end-diastolic volume (-25.1 ± 26.0 ml vs. -1.5 ± 25.4 ml for empagliflozin vs. placebo, respectively; p < 0.001) and LV end-systolic volume (-26.6 ± 20.5 ml vs. -0.5 ± 21.9 ml for empagliflozin vs. placebo; p < 0.001). Empagliflozin was associated with reductions in LV mass (-17.8 ± 31.9 g vs. 4.1 ± 13.4 g, for empagliflozin vs. placebo, respectively; p < 0.001) and LV sphericity, and improvements in LV ejection fraction (6.0 ± 4.2 vs. -0.1 ± 3.9; p < 0.001). Patients who received empagliflozin had significant improvements in peak O2 consumption (1.1 ± 2.6 ml/min/kg vs. -0.5 ± 1.9 ml/min/kg for empagliflozin vs. placebo, respectively; p = 0.017), oxygen uptake efficiency slope (111 ± 267 vs. -145 ± 318; p < 0.001), as well as in 6-min walk test (81 ± 64 m vs. -35 ± 68 m; p < 0.001) and quality of life (Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-12: 21 ± 18 vs. 2 ± 15; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Empagliflozin administration to nondiabetic HFrEF patients significantly improves LV volumes, LV mass, LV systolic function, functional capacity, and quality of life when compared with placebo. Our observations strongly support a role for sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors in the treatment of HFrEF patients independently of their glycemic status. (Are the "Cardiac Benefits" of Empagliflozin Independent of Its Hypoglycemic Activity? [ATRU-4] [EMPA-TROPISM]; NCT03485222).

Rationale and Design of the EMPA-TROPISM Trial (ATRU-4): Are the "Cardiac Benefits" of Empagliflozin Independent of its Hypoglycemic Activity?

The SGLT2 inhibitor empagliflozin reduced cardiovascular mortality by 38% and heart failure (HF) hospitalizations by 35% in diabetic patients. We have recently demonstrated the efficacy of empagliflozin in ameliorating HF and improving cardiac function in a non-diabetic porcine model of HF mediated via a switch in myocardial metabolism that enhances cardiac energetics. Therefore, we hypothesized that the cardiac benefits of empagliflozin can also be extended to non-diabetic HF patients. The EMPA-TROPISM clinical trial is a randomized, double-blind, parallel group, placebo-controlled, trial comparing the efficacy of and safety of empagliflozin in non-diabetic HF patients. Eighty patients with stable HF for over 3 months, LVEF < 50%, and New York Heart Association functional class II to IV symptoms will be randomized to empagliflozin 10 mg for 6 months or placebo. All patients will undergo cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET), 6-min walk test, and quality of life questionnaires. The primary outcome is the change in left ventricular end-diastolic volume measured by CMR. Secondary end-points include change in peak VO2 (CPET); change in LV mass, in LVEF, in myocardial mechanics (strains), in left atrium volumes, in RV function and volumes, in interstitial myocardial fibrosis, and in epicardial adipose tissue (CMR); change in the distance in the 6-min walk test; and changes in quality of life (Kansas Cardiomyopathy questionnaire [KCCQ-12] and the 36-Item Short Form Survey [SF-36]). Safety issues (e.g., hypoglycemia, urinary infections, ketoacidosis,…) will also be monitored. In summary, EMPA-TROPISM clinical trial will determine whether the SGLT2 inhibitor empagliflozin improves cardiac function and heart failure parameters in non-diabetic HF patients (EMPA-TROPISM [ATRU-4]: Are the "cardiac benefits" of Empagliflozin independent of its hypoglycemic activity; NCT 03485222).

Intravascular ultrasound guided directional atherectomy versus directional atherectomy guided by angiography for the treatment of femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare 1-year outcomes for patients with femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis using directional atherectomy guided by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) versus directional atherectomy guided by angiography. METHODS AND RESULTS: This was a retrospective analysis for patients with femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis treated with IVUS-guided directional atherectomy versus directional atherectomy guided by angiography from a single center between March 2012 and February 2016. Clinically driven target lesion revascularization was the primary endpoint and was evaluated through medical chart review as well as phone call follow up. CONCLUSIONS: Directional atherectomy guided by IVUS reduces clinically driven target lesion revascularization for patients with femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis.