Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Type of study
Language
Publication year range
1.
Surgery ; 175(3): 756-764, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37996341

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Surgery and radiation therapy remain the standard of care for patients with high-grade extremity soft tissue sarcoma that are >5 cm. Radiation therapy is time and labor-intensive for patients, and social determinants of health may affect adherence. The aim of this study was to define demographic, clinical, and treatment factors associated with the completion of radiation therapy and determine if preoperative radiation therapy improved adherence compared to postoperative radiation therapy. METHODS: The cohort included patients in the National Cancer Database with high-grade extremity soft tissue sarcoma >5 cm without nodal or distant metastases who received limb-sparing surgery and radiation therapy with microscopically negative R0 margins. Multivariable logistic regression analyses identified factors associated with radiation therapy sequencing and adherence (defined as completion of 50 Gy preoperative radiation therapy or at least 60 Gy postoperative radiation therapy). A multivariable Cox Proportional Hazards model assessed overall survival. RESULTS: Among 2,145 patients, 47.1% received preoperative radiation therapy (n = 1,010), and 52.9% (n = 1135) received postoperative radiation therapy. A greater proportion of patients treated with preoperative (77.2%) versus postoperative radiation therapy (64.9%, P < .0001) received the recommended dose. More patients with private insurance (49.8% vs 35.3% Medicaid vs 44.9% Medicare, P = .011) and patients treated at an academic medical center (52.6% vs 47.4%, P < .001) received preoperative radiation therapy. Patients who received preoperative radiation therapy had lower odds of receiving insufficient doses of radiation therapy (odds ratio 0.34 [95% CI 0.27-0.47]). Neither radiation therapy adherence nor sequencing were independent predictors of overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who received preoperative radiation therapy were more likely to complete therapy and receive an optimal dose than patients treated with postoperative radiation therapy. Preoperative radiation therapy improves adherence and should be widely considered in patients with high-grade extremity soft tissue sarcoma, particularly in patients at risk for not completing therapy.


Subject(s)
Sarcoma , Soft Tissue Neoplasms , Humans , Aged , United States , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant , Medicare , Extremities/pathology , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Sarcoma/radiotherapy , Sarcoma/surgery , Sarcoma/pathology , Soft Tissue Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Soft Tissue Neoplasms/surgery , Soft Tissue Neoplasms/pathology , Retrospective Studies
2.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 45(3): 329-334, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37807908

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess the relative risk of hospital-onset Clostridioides difficile (HO-CDI) during each month of the early coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and to compare it with historical expectation based on patient characteristics. DESIGN: This study used a retrospective cohort design. We collected secondary data from the institution's electronic health record (EHR). SETTING: The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Ohio, a large tertiary healthcare system in the Midwest. PATIENTS OR PARTICIPANTS: All adult patients admitted to the inpatient setting between January 2018 and May 2021 were eligible for the study. Prisoners, children, individuals presenting with Clostridioides difficile on admission, and patients with <4 days of inpatient stay were excluded from the study. RESULTS: After controlling for patient characteristics, the observed numbers of HO-CDI cases were not significantly different than expected. However, during 3 months of the pandemic period, the observed numbers of cases were significantly different from what would be expected based on patient characteristics. Of these 3 months, 2 months had more cases than expected and 1 month had fewer. CONCLUSIONS: Variations in HO-CDI incidence seemed to trend with COVID-19 incidence but were not fully explained by our case mix. Other factors contributing to the variability in HO-CDI incidence beyond listed patient characteristics need to be explored.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Clostridioides difficile , Clostridium Infections , Cross Infection , Adult , Child , Humans , Electronic Health Records , Retrospective Studies , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Clostridium Infections/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Hospitals
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...