Propofol, more than halothane, depresses electroencephalographic activation resulting from electrical stimulation in reticular formation.

BACKGROUND: Halothane and propofol depress the central nervous system, and this is partly manifested by a decrease in electroencephalographic (EEG) activity. Little work has been performed to determine the differences between these anesthetics with regard to their effects on evoked EEG activity. We examined the effects of halothane and propofol on EEG responses to electrical stimulation of the reticular formation. METHODS: Rats (n= 12) were anesthetized with either halothane or propofol, and EEG responses were recorded before and after electrical stimulation of the reticular formation. Two anesthetic concentrations were used (0.8 and 1.2 times the amount needed to prevent gross, purposeful movement in response to supramaximal noxious stimulation), and both anesthetics were studied in each rat using a cross-over design. RESULTS: Electrical stimulation in the reticular formation increased the spectral edge (SEF) and median edge (MEF) frequencies by approximately 1-2 Hz during halothane anesthesia at low and high concentrations. During propofol anesthesia, MEF increased at the low propofol infusion rate, but SEF was unaffected. At the high propofol infusion rate, SEF and MEF decreased following electrical stimulation in the reticular formation. CONCLUSIONS: At immobilizing concentrations, propofol produces a larger decrease than halothane in EEG responses to reticular formation stimulation, consistent with propofol having a more profound depressant effect on cortical and subcortical structures.

Nitrous oxide depresses electroencephalographic responses to repetitive noxious stimulation in the rat.

BACKGROUND: Although N(2)O has been widely used as an anaesthetic adjuvant its effect on electroencephalographic (EEG) activity is poorly understood because it is usually studied in the presence of additional anaesthetics, including inhaled anaesthetics. We examined the EEG effects of N(2)O in rats using a hyperbaric chamber that permitted N(2)O to be the sole anaesthetic. METHODS: Rats (n=10) were anaesthetized with isoflurane and EEG activity was recorded from skull screws. The rats were placed into a hyperbaric chamber and mechanically ventilated. Isoflurane was eliminated while the chamber was pressurized with N(2)O. The minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) was determined in five rats by adjusting the chamber pressure and N(2)O concentration, and applying a tetanic noxious stimulus to the tail via an electrical pass-through. EEG responses to noxious stimulation (20 electrical pulses at 40 V applied to the tail at 0.1, 1 and 3 Hz, and 50 Hz tetanic stimulation at 60 mA applied for 30 s) were determined at 1.5 and 2 atm N(2)O. RESULTS: The N(2)O MAC was 1.7+/-0.1 atm. No consistent EEG activation occurred during electrical stimulation at either partial pressure of N(2)O, although spontaneous EEG activation often occurred. Blood pressure increased after the 3 and 50 Hz stimuli. Four other rats anaesthetized with isoflurane had EEG activation with the 3 and 50 Hz stimuli. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that N(2)O at peri-MAC partial pressures prevents EEG activation resulting from noxious electrical stimulation. Unlike the situation with isoflurane, stimulus-evoked EEG activation did not occur at peri-MAC anaesthetic concentrations, suggesting that N(2)O potently blocked ascending nociceptive transmission.

Halothane and propofol differentially affect electroencephalographic responses to noxious stimulation.

BACKGROUND: Anaesthetics blunt neuronal responses to noxious stimulation, including effects on electroencephalographic (EEG) responses. It is unclear how anaesthetics differ in their ability to modulate noxious stimulation-evoked EEG activation. We investigated the actions of propofol and halothane on EEG responses to noxious stimuli, including repetitive electrical C-fibre stimulation, which normally evokes neuronal wind-up. METHODS: Rats were anaesthetized with halothane (n=8) or propofol (n=8), at 0.8x or 1.2x the amount required to produce immobility in response to tail clamping [minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) for halothane and median effective dose (ED(50)) for propofol]. We recorded EEG responses to repetitive electrical stimulus trains (delivered to the tail at 0.1, 1 and 3 Hz) as well as supramaximal noxious tail stimulation (clamp; 50 Hz electrical stimulus, each for 30 s). RESULTS: Under halothane anaesthesia, noxious stimuli evoked an EEG activation response manifested by increased spectral edge frequency (SEF) and median edge frequency (MEF). At 0.8 MAC halothane, the tail clamp increased the MEF from approximately 6 to approximately 8.5 Hz, and the SEF from approximately 25.5 to approximately 27 Hz. At both 0.8 and 1.2 MAC halothane, similar patterns of EEG activation were observed with the 1 Hz, 3 Hz and tetanic stimulus trains, but not with 0.1 Hz stimulation, which does not evoke wind-up. Under propofol anaesthesia, noxious stimuli were generally ineffective in causing EEG activation. At 0.8 ED(50) propofol, only the tail clamp and 1 Hz stimuli increased MEF ( approximately 8 to approximately 10-10.5 Hz). At the higher propofol infusion rate (1.2 ED(50)) the repetitive electrical stimuli did not evoke an EEG response, but the tetanic stimulus and the tail clamp paradoxically decreased SEF (from approximately 23 to approximately 21.5 Hz). CONCLUSIONS: Propofol has a more significant blunting effect on EEG responses to noxious stimulation compared with halothane.

Spinal anaesthesia indirectly depresses cortical activity associated with electrical stimulation of the reticular formation.

BACKGROUND: Neuraxial blockade reduces the requirements for sedation and general anaesthesia. We investigated whether lidocaine spinal anaesthesia affected cortical activity as determined by EEG desynchronization that occurs following electrical stimulation of the midbrain reticular formation (MRF). METHODS: Six goats were anaesthetized with isoflurane, and cervical laminectomy performed to permit spinal application of lidocaine. The EEG was recorded before, during and after focal electrical stimulation (0.1, 0.2, 0.3 and 0.4 mA) in the MRF while keeping the isoflurane concentration constant. RESULTS: During lidocaine spinal anaesthesia, the spectral edge frequency (SEF) after MRF electrical stimulation (13.6 (SD 1.0) Hz, averaged across all stimulus currents) was less than the SEF during control and recovery periods (18.6 (3.6) Hz and 17.2 (2.2) Hz, respectively; P<0.05). Bispectral index values were similarly affected: 69 (10) at control compared with 55 (6) during the spinal block (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that lidocaine spinal anaesthesia blocks ascending somatosensory transmission to mildly depress the excitability of reticulo-thalamo-cortical arousal mechanisms.

Na-dependent changes in intracellular Ca in spontaneously hypertensive rat hearts.

To determine whether Na/Ca exchange is altered in primary hypertension, Na-dependent changes in intracellular Ca, ([Ca]i), were measured in isolated perfused hearts from Wistar-Kyoto (WKY) and spontaneously hypertensive (SHR) rats. Intracellular Na, (Nai, mEq/kg dry wt), and [Ca]i were measured by NMR spectroscopy. Control [Ca]i was less in WKY than SHR (176 +/- 18 vs 253 +/- 21 nmol/l; mean +/- S.E., P < 0.05), whereas Nai was not significantly different. One explanation for this is that net Na/Ca exchange flux is decreased in SHR. If this hypothesis is correct, the rate of Ca uptake in SHR should be less than WKY when Na/Ca exchange is reversed by decreasing the transmembrane Na gradient. The Na gradient was reduced by decreasing extracellular Na, ([Na]o) and/or by increasing [Na]i. To increase [Na]i, Na uptake was stimulated by acidification while Na extrusion by Na/K ATPase was inhibited by K-free perfusion. Seventeen minutes after acidification, Nai had increased but was not significantly different in SHR and WKY (18.0 +/- 2.3 to 57.4 +/- 7.6 vs 20.3 +/- 0.6 to 66.5 +/- 4.8 mEq/kg dry wt, respectively). Yet [Ca]i was greater in WKY than SHR (1768 +/- 142 vs 1201 +/- 90 nmol/l; P < 0.05). [Ca]i was also measured after decreasing [Na]o from 141 to 30 mmol/l. Fifteen minutes after reducing [Na]o, [Ca]i was greater in WKY than SHR (833 +/- 119 vs 425 +/- 94 nmol/l; P < 0.05). Thus for both protocols, decreasing the transmembrane Na gradient led to increased [Ca]i in both SHR and WKY, but less increase in SHR. The results are consistent with the hypothesis that Na/Ca exchange activity is less in SHR than WKY myocardium.

Effect of chronic blood pressure reduction on soleus muscle contractile properties in spontaneously hypertensive rats.

Soleus muscle in Wistar-Kyoto rats (WKY), as well as in most normotensive mammals, is highly fatigue resistant. In 6-mo-old spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR), however, soleus muscle generates less specific force and experiences a more rapid rate of fatigue than in age-matched WKY. The present experiments tested the hypothesis that antihypertensive treatment with hydralazine or amlodipine would shift the contractile force and fatigue resistance profile of SHR soleus toward that which characterizes WKY. Hydralazine was given via the drinking water (100 mg/l) and amlodipine via the food (1 g/4 kg rat chow) to two separate groups of animals, starting at the age of 16 wk. At 24-26 wk of age soleus twitch and tetanic force generation and the rate of fatigue were evaluated during a 4-min period of repetitive stimulation. Although both hydralazine and amlodipine lowered blood pressure, they had different effects on muscle function. Hydralazine decreased force generation in both WKY and SHR at all stimulation frequencies; it did not change the fatigue properties of SHR but made WKY soleus less fatigue resistant. Amlodipine, on the other hand, increased contractile force in both WKY and SHR and increased fatigue resistance in SHR. Amlodipine is a dihydropyridine that blocks L-type channels, thereby preventing entry of Ca2+ into the muscle. We suggest that Ca2+ entry during activity stimulates Ca-activated K+ efflux in SHR and adds to the extracellular load of K+. Increased extracellular K+ can in turn depress contractile performance.