The management of pediatric hidradenitis suppurativa differs between dermatologic and non-dermatologic providers: A retrospective review.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: There is a paucity of pediatric hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) literature. The objective of this study was to characterize differences in management of pediatric HS patients by dermatology versus non-dermatology clinicians. METHODS: We examined a retrospective cohort of 195 pediatric patients with HS seen at our institution (3/1/19-3/1/20). Two-sample t-tests and two-proportion z-tests were performed. RESULTS: A total of 76.1% of subjects were seen by dermatology at least once, and of these, 79.1% were referred. HS diagnosis was most often made by dermatology (36.6%), followed by pediatrics (21.6%). Patients managed by dermatology were significantly more likely to have used standard of care therapies (p < .001). Of dermatology-managed patients, 19.7% were currently prescribed a biologic, as compared with zero patients not managed by dermatology. Those managed by dermatology were less likely to undergo surgical excision (13.3% vs. 25.5%, p = .04). CONCLUSIONS: Our results support increased likelihood of treatment escalation with medical management by dermatologists. Relatively high utilization of referral to dermatology exists, but with only moderate patient adherence. There is a need for improved access to dermatologic care and prospective studies to determine whether differences in specialty management translate to improved patient outcomes.

Sociodemographic Factors Affecting Loss to Follow-Up After Newborn Hearing Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Universal newborn hearing screening (NBHS) has been widely implemented as a part of early hearing detection and intervention (EHDI) programs worldwide. Even with excellent provider knowledge and screening rates, many infants do not receive definitive hearing testing or intervention after initial screening. The objective of this study was to identify sociodemographic factors contributing to loss of follow-up. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL. REVIEW METHODS: Per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, the databases were searched from the date of inception through December 28, 2021. Studies containing sociodemographic information on patients who were referred to NBHS were included. Meta-analysis of odds ratios (ORs) was performed comparing rates of sociodemographic variables between patients adherent and nonadherent to follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 169,238 infants from 19 studies were included. Low birth weight (OR 1.6 [95% confidence interval, CI 1.2-2.2, p < .001), racial minority (OR 1.4 [95% CI 1.2-1.6], p < .001), rural residence (OR 1.5 [95% CI 1.1-1.9], p = .005), lack of insurance (OR 1 [95% CI 1.4-2.5], p < .001), and public or state insurance (OR 1.7 [95% CI 1.2-4.2], p = .008) were associated with missed follow-up after referred NBHS. Associated maternal factors included low maternal education (OR 1.8 [95% CI 1.6-2.0], p < .001), young maternal age (OR 1.5 [95% CI 1.5-1.6], p < .001), unmarried maternal status (OR 1.5 [95% CI 1.1-1.9], p = .003), and current or former maternal smoking status (OR 1.8 [95% CI 1.4-2.2], p < .001). CONCLUSION: Both infant and maternal sociodemographic factors influence follow-up compliance after referred NBHS. Focused efforts should be made by medical providers and policymakers to address these factors to ensure appropriate newborn hearing care and interventions are achieved.