Efficacy of Prophylactic Postoperative Antibiotics in Tissue Expander-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Conflicting evidence exists regarding the utility of prophylactic postoperative antibiotics in tissue expander (TE)-based breast reconstruction. This study evaluated the risk of surgical-site infection between patients receiving 24 hours of perioperative antibiotics alone versus prolonged postoperative antibiotics within a propensity score-matched cohort. METHODS: Patients undergoing TE-based breast reconstruction receiving 24 hours of perioperative antibiotics alone were propensity score-matched 1:3 to patients receiving postoperative antibiotics based on demographics, comorbidities, and treatment factors. Incidence of surgical-site infection was compared based on duration of antibiotic prophylaxis. RESULTS: Of a total of 431 patients undergoing TE-based breast reconstruction, postoperative antibiotics were prescribed in 77.2%. Within this cohort, 348 were included for propensity matching (no antibiotics, 87 patients; antibiotics, 261 patients). After propensity score matching, there was no significant difference in incidence of infection requiring intravenous (no antibiotics, 6.9%; antibiotics, 4.6%; P = 0.35) or oral antibiotics (no antibiotics, 11.5%; antibiotics, 16.1%; P = 0.16). In addition, rates of unplanned reoperation ( P = 0.88) and 30-day readmission ( P = 0.19) were similar. After multivariate adjustment, prescription of postoperative antibiotics was not associated with a reduction in surgical-site infection (OR, 0.5; 95% CI, -0.3 to 1.3; P = 0.23). CONCLUSIONS: Within a propensity score-matched cohort accounting for patient comorbidities and receipt of adjuvant therapies, prescription of postoperative antibiotics after TE-based breast reconstruction conferred no improvement in rates of TE infection, reoperation, or unplanned health care use. These data underscore the need for multicenter randomized trials on the utility of antibiotic prophylaxis in TE-based breast reconstruction. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Variations in Incidence of Trigger Finger and Response to Corticosteroid Injection after Aromatase Inhibitor Therapy for Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Aromatase inhibitors (AIs), such as letrozole and anastrozole, have been demonstrated to have significant musculoskeletal symptoms in patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of specific AI medications on the incidence of trigger finger and independent factors affecting treatment outcomes within this population. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed at the authors' institution between the years 2014 and 2018 in patients with the diagnosis of breast cancer. This cohort was then sorted based on receiving medication regimens, trigger finger diagnosis, steroid injections, and need for surgical release of trigger finger. RESULTS: A total of 15,144 patients were included for initial review. The overall rate of trigger finger diagnosis was 2.75% in the entire breast cancer population and 4.5% for patients receiving AI therapy. Patients taking letrozole and anastrozole had an increased odds ratio of 2.0 and 1.7, respectively, for developing trigger finger. Patients who switched between letrozole and anastrozole during treatment had a higher rate of failed steroid injection treatment (45.2% versus 23.5%; P = 0.021). Among patients receiving AI treatment diagnosed with trigger finger, diabetes and hemoglobin A1c level greater than 6.5 were associated with significantly increased rates of failed steroid therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Patients receiving AI therapy have an increased incidence of trigger finger. The outcomes of treatment are equivalent between AI and non-AI trigger finger populations. However, steroid therapy is more likely to fail in patients who require switching of regimens because of significant musculoskeletal symptoms. Poorly controlled diabetes was also an independent factor for compromised steroid treatment of trigger finger. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Predicting Final Implant Volume in Two-stage Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction.

Two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction remains the most commonly performed reconstructive modality following mastectomy. Although prior studies have explored the relationship between tissue expander (TE) features and permanent implant (PI) size in subpectoral reconstruction, no such study exists in prepectoral reconstruction. This study aims to identify pertinent TE characteristics and evaluate their correlations with PI size for prepectoral implant-based reconstruction. Methods: This study analyzed patients who underwent two-stage prepectoral tissue expansion for breast reconstruction followed by implant placement. Patient demographics and oncologic characteristics were recorded. TE and PI features were evaluated. Significant predictors for PI volume were identified using linear and multivariate regression analyses. Results: We identified 177 patients and 296 breast reconstructions that met inclusion criteria. All reconstructions were performed in the prepectoral plane with the majority using acellular dermal matrix (93.8%) and primarily silicone implants (94.3%). Mean TE size was 485.4 cm3 with mean initial fill of 245.8 cm3 and mean final fill of 454.4 cm3. Mean PI size was 502.9 cm3 with a differential fill volume (PI-TE) of 11.7 cm3. Multivariate analysis identified significant features for PI size prediction, including TE size (R2 = 0.60; P < 0.0001) and TE final fill volume (R2 = 0.57; P < 0.0001). The prediction expression for TE final fill and TE size was calculated as 26.6 + 0.38*(TE final fill) + 0.61*(TE size). Conclusions: TE size and final expansion volume were significant variables for implant size prediction. With prepectoral implant placement gaining popularity, the predictive formula may help optimize preoperative planning and decision-making in prepectoral reconstructions.

Dorsal Hump Reduction and Midvault Reconstruction.

Dorsal hump reduction is one of the most common techniques used in modern rhinoplasty, yet it carries a high propensity for untoward aesthetic and functional sequelae, as evidenced by a nontrivial revision rate. Component dorsal hump reduction with stepwise deconstruction and manipulation of component parts allows for an adaptable and precise approach to variances in anatomy and in desired aesthetic result. Secondary changes must be anticipated and addressed at the index operation to avoid negative results and prevent the need for revision. Adequate reconstruction of the midvault is paramount to achieving optimal aesthetic and functional outcomes.

Clinical Competency Committees in Plastic Surgery Residency.

BACKGROUND: Clinical competency committees (CCCs) are now an Accreditation Council on Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) requirement for plastic surgery training programs. They serve to monitor resident progress and make formal recommendations to program directors on promotion, remediation, and dismissal, based on resident progress toward the curricular milestones. METHODS: Here, we present an overview on building, conducting, and improving a CCC, reviewing the literature available regarding best practices regarding this novel assessment system, with attention to the particular requirements for plastic surgery training. RESULTS: We present the results of the Duke University CAQCC as a case study in the efficacy of a well-executed group in terms of improved resident outcomes, particularly regarding In-service Examination scores as an objective measure. CONCLUSIONS: Rather than simply serving as a necessary ACGME dictum, the CCC has the opportunity to demonstrably improve resident education. This article is valuable for department leaders, program directors, faculty, and residents toward understanding the purpose and design of their CCC.

A Comparison of Surgical Complications in Patients Undergoing Delayed versus Staged Tissue-Expander and Free-Flap Breast Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing mastectomy may not be candidates for immediate free-flap breast reconstruction because of medical comorbidities or postmastectomy radiation therapy. In this setting, flap reconstruction may be intentionally delayed or staged with tissue expander placement ("delayed-immediate" reconstruction). The optimal reconstructive choice and incidence of complications for these approaches remain unclear. METHODS: The authors retrospectively identified patients who underwent delayed [n = 140 (72 percent)] or staged [n = 54 (28 percent)] abdominal free-flap breast reconstruction between 2010 and 2018 and compared the incidence of postoperative complications. RESULTS: Patients undergoing staged reconstruction had a higher overall incidence of perioperative complications, including surgical-site infection (40.7 percent versus 6.5 percent; p < 0.001), wound healing complications (29.6 percent versus 12.3 percent; p = 0.004), hematoma (11.1 percent versus 0.7 percent; p < 0.001), and return to the operating room (27.8 percent versus 4.4 percent; p < 0.0001). These complications occurred predominately during the expansion stage, resulting in an 18.5 percent (n = 10) rate of tissue expander failure. Mean time from mastectomy to flap reconstruction was 476.8 days (delayed, 536.4 days; staged, 322.4 days; p < 0.001). At the time of flap reconstruction, there was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the staged cohort versus the delayed cohort, including microsurgical complications (1.9 percent versus 4.3 percent; p = 0.415), total flap loss (0 percent versus 2.1 percent; p = 0.278), or fat necrosis (5.6 percent versus 5.0 percent; p = 0.875). CONCLUSIONS: The aesthetic and psychosocial benefits of staged free-flap breast reconstruction should be balanced with the increased risk of perioperative complications as compared to a delayed approach. Complications related to definitive flap reconstruction do not appear to be affected by the approach taken at the time of mastectomy. . CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

An Assessment of Patient Satisfaction and Decisional Regret in Patients Undergoing Staged Free-Flap Breast Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: In the setting of radiation therapy or significant medical comorbidities, free-flap breast reconstruction may be intentionally delayed or staged with tissue expander placement ("delayed-immediate" approach). The effect of a staged approach on patient satisfaction and decisional regret remains unclear. METHODS: All patients undergoing free-flap breast reconstruction (n = 334) between 2014 and 2019 were identified. Complication rates, patient satisfaction using the BREAST-Q, and decisional regret using the Decision Regret Scale were compared between patients undergoing immediate, delayed, and staged approaches. RESULTS: Overall, 100 patients completed the BREAST-Q and Decision Regret Scale. BREAST-Q scores for psychosocial well-being (P = 0.19), sexual well-being (P = 0.26), satisfaction with breast (P = 0.28), physical well-being (chest, P = 0.49), and physical well-being (abdomen, P = 0.42) did not significantly vary between patients undergoing delayed, staged, or immediate reconstruction. Overall, patients experienced low regret after reconstruction (mean score, 11.5 ± 17.1), and there was no significant difference in regret scores by reconstruction timing (P = 0.09). Compared with normative BREAST-Q data, unlike immediate and delayed approaches, staged reconstruction was associated with lower sexual well-being (P = 0.006). Furthermore, a significantly higher infection rate was seen among staged patients (immediate 0%, delayed 5%, staged 20%, P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Staged free-flap breast reconstruction confers similar long-term satisfaction and decisional regret as immediate and delayed reconstruction but may be associated with worsened sexual well-being, when compared with normative data, and an increased risk of surgical site infection. When counseling patients regarding the timing of reconstruction, it is important to weigh these risks in the context of equivalent long-term satisfaction and decisional regret between immediate, delayed, and staged approaches.