Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Curr HIV/AIDS Rep ; 21(5): 282-292, 2024 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39046639

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Despite the growing availability of oral PrEP, coverage remains suboptimal. Through the introduction of additional PrEP methods, including vaginal rings and long-acting injectable formulations, health systems globally are on the cusp of offering PrEP methods that vary by route of administration, efficacy, and frequency of use. With PrEP choice, it will be important to explore PrEP use patterns to better understand how the ability to choose and switch products affects coverage and continuation. In this review, we draw parallels with family planning (FP) by summarizing how method choice and product switching affected contraceptive coverage globally, synthesize what is known about PrEP product switching, and outline evidence gaps to help guide future research on PrEP switching in the context of choice. RECENT FINDINGS: Decades of research in FP has demonstrated that product switching is common and can lead to more satisfaction and increases in contraceptive use. While research on PrEP product switching is nascent, findings suggest switching is common, and that providing more than one PrEP option can increase coverage. Key evidence gaps include understanding product switching in the context of full versus constrained choice, switching in the context of temporary need, and developing interventions that promote product switching for those who could benefit. Providing choice and allowing people to start, stop, and switch products according to their needs and desires is a core component of a rights-based approach to HIV prevention. More research is needed to better understand what drives use patterns, including switching, and how to leverage choice to improve coverage. Standard definitions -some of which have been proposed in this review-are needed to inform comparable measurement. Finally, there is a need to holistically frame PrEP use to acknowledge changes in need over the life course, thus making method switching a standard part of HIV prevention.


Subject(s)
Anti-HIV Agents , HIV Infections , Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis , Humans , Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis/methods , HIV Infections/prevention & control , Anti-HIV Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-HIV Agents/therapeutic use , Family Planning Services/methods , Female
2.
Lancet HIV ; 10(4): e269-e272, 2023 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37001965

ABSTRACT

The HIV prevention landscape is on the cusp of an unprecedented era of multiple biomedical prevention products available for distribution. Several HIV prevention options, such as oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), dapivirine vaginal rings, and injectable cabotegravir for PrEP, are becoming more widely available. Although the future HIV prevention market promises to be rich in options, it would benefit from a core set of principles that uphold choice in all phases of product development, assessment, and introduction. These principles, as presented in this Viewpoint, show the applicability, opportunities, and challenges of choice in different contexts of HIV prevention and provide checkpoints of accountability. By committing to these principles, stakeholders at national and global levels can advance choice across all phases of the HIV prevention market, thereby ensuring that individuals can realise their right to choose when and how to prevent HIV in their own lives.


Subject(s)
Anti-HIV Agents , Contraceptive Devices, Female , HIV Infections , Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis , Female , Humans , HIV Infections/prevention & control , HIV Infections/drug therapy , Anti-HIV Agents/therapeutic use
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL