Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Int J Womens Health ; 8: 421-8, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27574471

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To measure the impact of a maternal health package on health facility delivery and stillbirth rates. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study in Ethiopia where a maternal package was integrated into eight health centers across three regions. The package included trained midwives with a mentoring program, transport for referral, and equipment and accommodation for the midwives. Ten health centers without the package but in the same districts as the intervention centers and eight without the package in different districts were randomly selected as the comparison groups. Women living in the catchment areas of the 26 health centers, who delivered a baby in the past 12 months, were randomly selected to complete a face-to-face survey about maternal health experiences. RESULTS: The maternal package did not significantly affect the stillbirth or facility delivery rates. Women were positively influenced to deliver in a health facility if their husbands were involved in the decision concerning the place of birth and if they had prior maternal experience in the health center. Barriers to delivering in a health facility included distance and ability to read and write. CONCLUSION: Women served by health centers with a maternal health package did not have significantly fewer stillbirths and were not more likely to deliver their babies in a health facility. Husbands played an important role in influencing the decisions to deliver in a health facility.

2.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 133(2): 164-7, 2016 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26899816

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether community-based prenatal and intrapartum care in Ethiopia results in a lower stillbirth rate. METHODS: Between May and December 2014, a randomly selected sample of women in northern and eastern Ethiopia who had delivered a neonate in the preceding 12months completed a face-to-face survey about their experiences of maternal services and the fetal outcome for each delivery. The stillbirth rates among women delivering at home and at health facilities were compared. RESULTS: Overall, 4442 women completed surveys. Stillbirth was reported by 42 (1.7%) of the 2437 women who had received prenatal care and 53 (2.8%) of the 1921 women who did not receive prenatal care (P=0.01). The stillbirth rate was similar among women who delivered in a health center (27/1417 [1.9%]), in a hospital (6/126 [4.8%]), and at home (62/2725 [2.3%]; P=0.13). However, women experiencing an intrapartum emergency were twice as likely to deliver in a health facility (odds ratio 2.6, 95% confidence interval 2.2-3.0). Satisfaction with health-center care was moderately good (median score 77.5/100). CONCLUSION: The stillbirth rate was reduced among women receiving prenatal care, although delivering in a health facility did not reduce the risk of stillbirth. Improving the quality of health-center care could lead to their planned use for childbirth, which might reduce stillbirth rates.


Subject(s)
Community Health Services , Delivery, Obstetric/statistics & numerical data , Home Childbirth/statistics & numerical data , Prenatal Care/statistics & numerical data , Rural Population/statistics & numerical data , Stillbirth/epidemiology , Adult , Ethiopia , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy , Socioeconomic Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
3.
Int Urogynecol J ; 27(7): 1063-7, 2016 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26755052

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Little is known about the extent to which women in low- and middle-income countries suffer with urological and urogynaecological complications of childbirth. This study measured the prevalence of obstetric fistula and symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in east and north Ethiopia. METHODS: We randomly selected 23,023 women of reproductive age (15-49 years) from 113 villages in East Harraghe, South Gondar and West Gojjam, Ethiopia. Trained local health workers administered a validated face-to-face survey and a team of researchers verified data by readministering a random selection (5 %) of the survey. All suspected fistulae were followed up to confirm a clinical diagnosis. RESULTS: Mean age was 29.5 [standard deviation (SD) 8.05] years. Only 22 % of women were knowledgeable about the symptoms of fistula. The prevalence of all obstetric fistulae was 6:10,000 reproductive-aged women [95 % confidence interval (CI) 3-8], of untreated fistula 2:10,000 (95 % CI 0-4) and of symptomatic POP 100:10,000 (95 % CI 86-114). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of obstetric fistula in these rural zones of Ethiopia is relatively low and reflects a substantial reduction from previous reports. Significant numbers of women suffer with symptomatic POP, for which surgical and nonsurgical treatments would be beneficial. Obstetric fistula in north and east Ethiopia is relatively low; however, the many women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse could benefit from treatment.


Subject(s)
Delivery, Obstetric/adverse effects , Pelvic Organ Prolapse/epidemiology , Vaginal Fistula/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Ethiopia/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Vaginal Fistula/etiology , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...