The Orthotic Effects of Different Functional Electrical Stimulation Protocols on Walking Performance in Individuals with Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury: A Case Series.

Background: Functional electrical stimulation (FES) of paralyzed muscles can facilitate walking after spinal cord injury (SCI). Objectives: To test the orthotic effects of different FES walking protocols on lower joint kinematics and walking speed. Methods: Three adults with incomplete SCI participated in this study. Their lower extremity motor scores and 10-meter walk test results were as follows: subject A: 50, 1.05 m/s, subject B: 44, 0.29 m/s, and subject C: 32, 0.27 m/s. Participants completed four conditions of over-ground walking including no FES and three bilateral FES-walking protocols as follows: multi-muscle stimulation (stimulation of quadriceps and gastrocnemius in the stance phase, and hamstring and tibialis anterior in the swing phase), drop foot (tibialis anterior stimulation), and flexor withdrawal (common peroneal nerve stimulation). The FES system obtained gait phase information from foot switches located under the individuals' heels. Three-dimensional kinematic analysis was undertaken to measure minimum toe clearance (MTC); ankle, knee, and hip range of motion (ROM); stride length; and stride speed. Results: Compared to no-FES walking, MTC increased during drop foot (all subjects), flexor withdrawal (subjects A and B), and multi-muscle stimulation (subjects B and C) protocols. A significant decrease in ankle ROM was seen with drop foot (all subjects), flexor withdrawal (subjects A), and multi-muscle stimulation (subjects A and C) protocols. Hip ROM increased with drop foot (subjects B and C), flexor withdrawal (subject B), and multi-muscle stimulation (subject C) protocols. Conclusion: Three FES walking protocols induced positive kinematic changes as indicated by increased MTC, decreased ankle ROM, and increased hip ROM during walking in subjects with incomplete SCI.

Perspectives and expectations of stroke survivors using egocentric cameras for monitoring hand function at home: a mixed methods study.

PURPOSE: Most stroke survivors have remaining upper limb impairment six months after stroke and require additional rehabilitation and help from family members to enhance their performance of daily activities. First-person (egocentric) video has been proposed to capture the activities of daily living (ADLs) of stroke survivors in order to assess their hand function at home. This study explored the experiences and expectations of stroke survivors regarding the use of egocentric cameras in daily life for rehabilitation applications. METHODS: Twenty-one chronic stroke survivors recruited for the study were asked to record three sessions of 1.5 h of video of their ADLs at home over two weeks. Their experiences and expectations after completing the recordings were discussed using a structured questionnaire and a semi-structured interview. The questionnaire and interview data were analysed using descriptive statistics and content analysis, respectively. The results were further integrated using a mixed methods analysis for mutual explanation and elaboration. RESULTS: The themes generated were Camera Usability, Privacy Concerns Related to Home Recordings, Future Use of the Camera in Public, and Information Usefulness. The participants perceived that the camera was easy to use, the information obtained from the recordings was beneficial, and no major concerns about recording at home. A discreet camera and a solution to privacy issues were prerequisites to recording tasks in public. CONCLUSIONS: There was high acceptance among stroke survivors regarding the use of wearable cameras for rehabilitation purposes in the future. Concerns to be managed include discomfort, self-consciousness, and the privacy of others.Implications for rehabilitationThe egocentric camera was easy for the stroke survivors to use at home. However, they expressed a preference for cameras to be less noticeable and lighter in the future to minimize self-consciousness and discomfort.Expectations for future use of an egocentric camera for upper limb rehabilitation at home from the perspectives of stroke survivors included receiving feedback on their hand function in daily life and guidance on how to improve function.Privacy concerns of stroke survivors regarding recording activities of daily living were mostly avoidable by planning in advance. However, some personal hygiene tasks and virtual meetings were recorded by accident. A checklist of common activities that may raise privacy issues can be provided along with the camera to serve as a reminder to avoid these issues.