Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
2.
Public Health Action ; 12(2): 96-101, 2022 Jun 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35734011

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) are not widely used for patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and multidrug- or rifampicin-resistant TB (MDR/RR-TB). We describe the implementation aspects of a new integrated model of care in Armenia and the perceptions of the healthcare staff and patients. METHODS: We used qualitative methods, including a desktop review and semi-structured individual interviews with healthcare staff and with patients receiving HCV and MDR/RR-TB treatment. RESULTS: The new integrated model resulted in simplified management of HCV and MDR/RR-TB at public TB facilities. Training on HCV was provided for TB clinic staff. All MDR/RR-TB patients were systematically offered HCV testing and those diagnosed with HCV, offered treatment with DAAs. Treatment monitoring was performed by TB staff in coordination with a hepatologist. The staff interviewed had a positive opinion of the new model. They suggested that additional training should be provided. Most patients were fully satisfied with the care received. Some were concerned about the increased pill burden. CONCLUSION: Integrating HCV treatment into MDR/ RR-TB care was feasible and appreciated by patients and staff. This new model facilitated HCV diagnosis and treatment among people with MDR/RR-TB. Our results encourage piloting this model in other settings.


CONTEXTE: Les antiviraux à action directe (DAA) sont peu prescrits aux patients atteints d'hépatite C (HCV) chronique et de TB multirésistante ou résistante à la rifampicine (MDR/RR-TB). Nous décrivons la mise en place d'un nouveau modèle de soins intégrés en Arménie, ainsi que l'opinion du personnel soignant et des patients. MÉTHODES: Nous avons utilisé des méthodes qualitatives, comprenant un examen électronique de la documentation et des entretiens individuels semi-structurés avec le personnel soignant et les patients sous traitement pour HCV et MDR/RR-TB. RÉSULTATS: Le nouveau modèle intégré a permis de simplifier la prise en charge du HCV et de la MDR/RR-TB dans les centres de soins publics de la TB. Une formation sur le HCV a été dispensée au personnel des centres antituberculeux. Tous les patients atteints de MDR/RR-TB se sont vu systématiquement proposer un test de dépistage du HCV, et un traitement par DAA a été proposé à ceux dont le résultat était positif. Le suivi du traitement a été réalisé par le personnel des centres antituberculeux, conjointement à un hépatologue. Les membres du personnel interrogés avaient une opinion positive du nouveau modèle et suggéraient de dispenser d'autres formations. La plupart des patients étaient pleinement satisfaits des soins reçus, mais certains étaient inquiets au vu du nombre accru de comprimés à prendre. CONCLUSION: L'intégration du traitement du HCV aux soins de la MDR/RR-TB s'est avérée possible et a été appréciée par les patients et le personnel soignant. Ce nouveau modèle a facilité le diagnostic et le traitement du HCV chez les patients atteints de MDR/RR-TB. Ce modèle devrait être testé dans d'autres contextes.

3.
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis ; 24(10): 1087-1094, 2020 10 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33126944

ABSTRACT

SETTING: Active pharmacovigilance (PV) is recommended for TB programmes, notably for multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB) patients treated with new drugs. Launched with the support of UNITAID in April 2015, endTB (Expand New Drug markets for TB) facilitated treatment with bedaquiline (BDQ) and/or delamanid of >2600 patients in 17 countries, and contributed to the creation of a central PV unit (PVU).OBJECTIVE: To explain the endTB PVU process by describing the serious adverse events (SAEs) experienced by patients who received BDQ-containing regimens.DESIGN: The overall PV strategy was in line with the 'advanced´ WHO active TB drug safety monitoring and management (aDSM) system. All adverse events (AEs) of clinical significance were followed up; the PVU focused on signal detection from SAEs.RESULTS and CONCLUSION: Between 1 April 2015 and 31 March 2019, the PVU received and assessed 626 SAEs experienced by 417 BDQ patients. A board of MDR-TB/PV experts reviewed unexpected and possibly drug-related SAEs to detect safety signals. The experts communicated on clusters of risks factors, notably polypharmacy and off-label drug use, encouraging a patient-centred approach of care. Organising advanced PV in routine care is possible but demanding. It is reasonable to expect local/national programmes to focus on clinical management, and to limit reporting to aDSM systems to key data, such as the SAEs.


Subject(s)
Pharmacovigilance , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant , Antitubercular Agents/adverse effects , Diarylquinolines/adverse effects , Humans , Off-Label Use , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant/drug therapy
4.
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis ; 22(7): 766-772, 2018 07 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29914602

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND SETTING: Bedaquiline (BDQ) was initially only available through compassionate use programmes. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness and safety of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) treatment containing BDQ. METHOD: Retrospective analysis of data from patients receiving BDQ through compassionate use in Armenia and Georgia from April 2013 to April 2015. Logistic regression was used to assess the risk factors associated with unsuccessful treatment outcomes. RESULTS: Of 82 patients included, 84.2% (69/82) had fluoroquinolone-resistant MDR-TB and 43.4% (23/53) were seropositive for the hepatitis C virus (HCV). The culture conversion rate was 84.4% (54/64), and 18.5% (10/54) reverted back to positive. In total, 79.3% (65/82) of the patients reported at least one adverse event. Serious adverse events were reported in 14 patients, with 10/14 patients experiencing fatal outcomes-6/10 related to advanced TB and 2/10 assessed as possibly related to BDQ. Treatment outcomes were as follows: 58.5% treatment success, 12.2% deaths, 7.3% failures and 21.9% lost to follow-up. HCV coinfection was associated with unsuccessful outcomes (adjusted OR 4.45, 95%CI 1.23-16.13). CONCLUSION: BDQ through compassionate use showed relatively good success rates and safety profiles in a cohort with difficult-to-treat MDR-TB. High rates of reversion may indicate that >24 weeks of BDQ is necessary in some cases. HCV coinfection should be diagnosed and treatment considered in MDR-TB patients.


Subject(s)
Antitubercular Agents/administration & dosage , Diarylquinolines/administration & dosage , Hepatitis C/epidemiology , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant/drug therapy , Adult , Antitubercular Agents/adverse effects , Armenia , Cohort Studies , Coinfection , Compassionate Use Trials , Diarylquinolines/adverse effects , Female , Fluoroquinolones/pharmacology , Follow-Up Studies , Georgia , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...