ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: This mixed studies synthesis sought to evaluate structured patient education interventions (PEIs) to elucidate relevant conditions and mechanisms for increasing physical activity behavior in men with prostate cancer (PCa). METHODS: Studies that randomized men diagnosed with PCa, assessed PEIs, and reported (1) between-group changes in the outcome measures of exercise self-efficacy, PA level, or patient-centered outcomes (cancer-related fatigue, aerobic fitness, and quality of life) at baseline and post-intervention, and/or (2) men's perceptions of structured PEIs were synthesized. Results from five RCTs reporting data on 895 men and qualitative reports from four studies were respectively and sequentially analyzed with narrative and thematic syntheses. Findings from both syntheses were further integrated using the context-mechanism-outcome configuration (CMO) to elucidate potential "contextual factors" or "conditions" that may support plausible PEI mechanisms. RESULTS: Structured PEIs were associated with a beneficial increase in task self-efficacy, vigorous-intensity PA, minutes/week of resistance exercise, the proportion of men meeting ≥ 150 minutes/week of moderate-vigorous intensity aerobic exercise, and overall PA. No effects were found on patient-centered outcomes. Drawing upon the CMO configuration, the inclusion of a referral process, access to "credible influence" (e.g., involving former patients as program facilitators), and adopting hybrid service delivery are likely critical conditions that may explain the success of PEIs in men with PCa. CONCLUSION: PEIs can increase PA behavior in men with PCa. The likelihood of success is higher for multicomponent interventions that prioritized credible influence and exercise referral as critical components besides offering access to interventions within hospital settings, with home-based sessions in addition.
Subject(s)
Prostatic Neoplasms , Quality of Life , Exercise , Fatigue , Humans , Male , Patient Education as TopicABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Poor locomotion and balance in Parkinson's disease (PD) often diminishes independence. Accordingly, gait is considered one of the most relevant rehabilitation outcomes, and home-based balance exercises might be a viable mode of exercise delivery for individuals with PD. However, research on PD interventions rarely indicate best practices to deliver exercises. Therefore, this study endeavoured to compare the efficacy of a home-based and therapist-supervised balance programme on gait parameters, dynamic balance, balance confidence and motivation in individuals diagnosed with PD. METHODS: An experimental study design, including a cluster randomized convenience sample, of 40 participants with idiopathic PD (Hoehn and Yahr stage I-III; age: 65.0±7.7years). Participants were divided into a therapist-supervised (n=24) and home-based group (n=16). Groups received either eight weeks of balance training with an exercise therapist or a DVD. Outcome measures include the instrumented Timed-Up-and-Go, Functional Gait Analysis (FGA), Activity-specific Balance confidence (ABC) scale and Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMI). RESULTS: Both groups improved in stride length (p<0.05). Similar FGA improved by 9% and 16% in the therapist-supervised and home-based group, respectively (p<0.01). Only the therapist-supervised group showed improvements in ABC (p=0.051), stride velocity (p=0.0006) and cadence (p=0.046) over the intervention; the latter two were also better compared to home-based (p<0.05). Furthermore the therapist-supervised group were more motivated (p=002). CONCLUSION: The home-based balance programme was effective in improving some aspects of gait, albeit the programme supervised by an exercise therapist included somewhat more benefits after the intervention i.e. stride velocity and cadence in individuals with mild to moderate PD.
