ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: This paper explores the feasibility of a new therapy for the treatment of hypospadias patients. Hypospadias is a very common congenital malformation of male genitals, with very high rate of recurrences after surgery. The field of regenerative medicine, which offers innovative solutions for many pathologies, still does not offer reliable solution for this pathology. Here, we propose quality, safety, and clinical feasibility assessment for an oral mucosa advanced therapy medicinal product (ATMP) grown on a biocompatible scaffold for a clinical study on urethral reconstruction of hypospadias patients. METHODS: Urethral and oral mucosal epithelia from donor biopsies were cultivated between two fibrin layers, under clinical-grade conditions for cell and tissue characterization and comparison, aimed at tissue engineering. In addition, single-clone analyses were performed to analyze gene expression profiles of the two epithelia by microarray technology. RESULTS: Oral mucosa appeared suitable for urethral reconstruction. The resulting ATMP was proven to maintain stem cells and regenerative potency. The preclinical safety studies were performed on human tissues to assess abnormalities and tumorigenicity, and confirmed the safety of the ATMP. Finally, the patient selection and the clinical protocol for the upcoming clinical trial were defined. CONCLUSIONS: Against this backdrop, in this paper, we are proposing a new reproducible and reliable ATMP for the treatment of hypospadias.
Subject(s)
Hypospadias/surgery , Mouth Mucosa/transplantation , Urethra/surgery , Animals , Disease Models, Animal , Feasibility Studies , Humans , In Vitro Techniques , Male , Swine , Tissue Engineering , Tissue Scaffolds , Urologic Surgical Procedures, Male/methodsABSTRACT
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review highlights problems related to translation of advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs) from bench to bedsite. Regenerative medicine within the current regulatory frame reveals common hitches in the course of development, translation, and clinical application. This paper suggests outlining a path from the few examples of successfully approved vs unsuccessful advanced therapies. RECENT FINDINGS: In the multitude of ongoing studies, few of them achieved positive results with a final treatment available to patients; this result was possible due to multidisciplinary teams working together from the beginning of the development and during the hard route to standardization and clinical application. SUMMARY: The root of success of an advanced therapy requires not only the inescapable scientific and biological knowledge but also requires several contributions as regulatory, ethical, medical, and bio-engineering expertise, from the real beginning. A strong scientific rationale and an integrated network of expertises would contribute to a successful investment of available resources in advanced therapy medicinal products and to a greater confidence in future medicine.
