Assessment of cervical lymph node status in head and neck cancer patients: palpation, computed tomography and low field magnetic resonance imaging compared with ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology.

OBJECTIVE: Since the assessment of lymph node metastases in head and neck cancer patients remains a major problem, the findings of different imaging methods and the role of these methods in the clinical management are compared. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Palpation, computed tomography (CT) and low field magnetic resonance imaging (MRI; 0.1 T) are evaluated and compared with ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology (US-guided FNAC) prospectively in 105 consecutive patients with a primary cancer in the head and neck region. RESULTS: In the subgroup of 86 patients with palpable normal necks, CT showed lymph nodes fulfilling the radiologic criteria for malignancy in 27% (23/86), MRI in 17% (10/60) and US in 14% (12/86) of the patients US guided FNAC usually showed malignancy in necks containing lymph nodes with central necrosis on CT, but the enlarged lymph nodes that were also common on the contralateral side were often benign on cytology. In 5 patients, FNAC under US-guidance showed malignancy although none of them had lymph nodes fulfilling the radiologic criteria for malignancy. In the other subgroup of 19 patients with palpable metastatic necks, 2 patients had bilateral metastases detected by all imaging methods but not by palpation. CONCLUSION: CT is superior to low field MRI in depicting small pathologic lymph nodes. Unlike lymph node structure, lymph node size is not a highly reliable criterion for malignancy. The findings must be correlated in relation to the primary disease. Since FNAC under US-guidance offers additional information about enlarged lymph nodes and since it can show malignancy in small lymph nodes not found by other methods, it can be recommended for most head and neck cancer patients irrespective of the use of CT or MRI.

Palpation, ultrasound, and ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology in the assessment of cervical lymph node status in head and neck cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Lymph node status of the neck is the most important prognostic factor in head and neck cancer patients. Assessment of the lymph nodes status is still often based on palpation only, although the low accuracy of palpation is known. METHODS: Altogether 105 consecutive head and neck cancer patients were examined using ultrasound (US) and ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) to evaluate the additional information obtained by these methods. RESULTS: Of the 86 patients with palpable normal necks, FNAC taken under US-guidance showed malignancy in 13. The US size criteria for malignancy were fulfilled in 7 of these patients, whereas the lymph nodes were of normal size in 6 of them. In the whole patient material, US-guided FNAC showed bilateral metastasis in 3 patients although only unilateral or no metastasis was found by palpation. CONCLUSION: US combined with US-guided FNAC can be recommended as a method for evaluating for regional metastases in head and neck cancer patients, both for those with and those without palpable metastasis.