Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Ark Med Soc ; 90(9): 427-34, 1994 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8163425

ABSTRACT

The silicone breast implant controversy has amassed a great deal of media coverage in the past year. Unfortunately, separating fact from fiction has been extremely frustrating and difficult, not only for physicians but for women who have either had or are considering cosmetic or reconstructive surgery of the breast. At a recent meeting attended by most of the board eligible and certified Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons in the State of Arkansas, it was felt that a consensus statement was needed to clarify the issues and inform other Arkansas physicians of the most up to date information. The result is a fairly comprehensive review which will require your indulgence. Breast implants are placed not only by Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons, but by Otolaryngologists, "Facial Plastic Surgeons", Obstetricians/Gynecologists, General Surgeons, Dermatologists and Family Practitioners. We believe it is the ethical and legal responsibility of the physicians who elect to perform these procedures to provide adequate care and follow-up for these patients when either real or perceived problems arise. Accurate information, reassurance and occasionally re-operations are required for many of these patients.


Subject(s)
Autoimmune Diseases/etiology , Breast Neoplasms/etiology , Foreign-Body Migration/etiology , Health Policy , Mammaplasty , Prostheses and Implants , Silicones , United States Food and Drug Administration/legislation & jurisprudence , Autoimmune Diseases/diagnosis , Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Equipment Failure , Female , Foreign-Body Migration/diagnosis , Gels , Humans , Prostheses and Implants/adverse effects , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...