Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Hong Kong Med J ; 13(6): 478-81, 2007 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18057438

ABSTRACT

Gastro-intestinal stromal tumours are rarely found in the oesophagus and it is uncommon for these tumours to present with rupture. In this paper, we report a case where the tumour ruptured through the distal oesophagus. As a result, the patient underwent surgical tumour dissection. A histopathological examination of the tumour mass confirmed that it was a gastro-intestinal stromal tumour. In this report, we review the diagnosis, pathology, and treatment of a patient presenting with a ruptured oesophageal gastro-intestinal stromal tumour.


Subject(s)
Esophageal Neoplasms/complications , Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors/complications , Pleural Cavity/pathology , Adult , Esophageal Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors/diagnostic imaging , Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors/pathology , Humans , Male , Rupture, Spontaneous , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
2.
Br J Radiol ; 79(941): 368-71, 2006 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16632615

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical safety of intravenous gadolinium-based contrast media used in patients who underwent MRI at a single institution. Acute adverse reactions to intravenous gadolinium-based contrast media used for MRI at the Princess Margaret Hospital, Hong Kong, SAR, from January 1999 to November 2004 were recorded in an incidence log book. The medical records of patients' demographics were retrospectively reviewed and the nature, frequency and severity of the adverse reactions were investigated and documented. The incidence of acute adverse reactions to intravenous gadolinium-based contrast media was 0.48% (45 patients with 46 adverse reactions). The severity of these adverse reactions were 96% mild, 2% moderate (one patient developed shortness of breath that required oxygen supplementation and intravenous steroidal management) and 2% severe (one patient developed an anaphylactoid reaction, but successfully recovered through timely resuscitation). No patients were recorded as having contrast extravasation and none died as a result of any adverse reaction. Among the 45 patients who developed adverse reactions, three patients (6.7%) had prior adverse reactions to iodinated contrast media, three (6.7%) had prior reactions to a different gadolinium-based contrast agent, one (2%) had asthma and nine (20%) had a history of drug/food allergy. Overall, 41% of the adverse reactions were not documented in the final MRI report or the clinical medical records. Gadolinium-based contrast media are safe and well tolerated by the vast majority of patients. In our study, the adverse reaction rate (0.48%) and the incidence of severe anaphylactoid reaction (0.01%) concur with those reported in the literature. Although most of the symptoms are mild and transient, these adverse reactions must be accurately documented and managed.


Subject(s)
Contrast Media/adverse effects , Drug Hypersensitivity/etiology , Gadolinium DTPA/adverse effects , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Acute Disease , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Anaphylaxis/etiology , Asthma/complications , Child , Dyspnea/etiology , Female , Hong Kong , Humans , Hypersensitivity, Delayed/complications , Incidence , Injections, Intravenous , Male , Middle Aged , Nausea/etiology , Osmolar Concentration , Recurrence , Retrospective Studies , Urticaria/etiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...