Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Theriogenology ; 160: 90-94, 2021 Jan 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33189078

ABSTRACT

Correctly identifying cows in estrus and inseminating them at the optimal time are critical components of reproductive management. Technologies for detecting cows in estrus have developed from tail paint in the 1970's to automated activity monitors and mount detectors in recent decades. The objectives of this study were to identify animal characteristics associated with estrous behaviour, measured using a mount detector (FlashMate; Farmshed Labs) and an accelerometer-based activity monitor (Moomonitor, Dairymaster), to examine the relationship between estrous behaviour measured by both devices, and to examine the characteristics associated with pregnancy per AI. Four hundred and sixty eight lactating dairy cows managed on three research farms were enrolled and data were available from 465 cows and 369 cows with Moomonitor and FlashMate data, respectively. Of 234 cows that provided both Moomonitor and FlashMate data, the mean (±SEM) onset of device activation occurred 1.1 (±0.4) h earlier with the Moomonitor compared with the FlashMate. The mean (±SD) duration of Moomonitor activity and FlashMate activity was 17.2 ± 6.1 h and 8.7 ± 5.8 h, respectively. The duration of Moomonitor activity and FlashMate activity was negatively associated with total milk yield during the first five weeks of lactation. The duration of FlashMate activity, but not the duration of Moomonitor activity was positively associated with days in milk. Pregnancy per AI was positively associated with BCS, days in milk, the duration of FlashMate activity and the interval from the onset of Moomonitor and FlashMate activity to AI. Inseminating cows ≤2 h after FlashMate activation or ≤4 h after Moomonitor activation was associated with reduced odds of pregnancy compared with later timing of AI. Overall, 55% of cows received mounts for ≤8 h, highlighting the need for ≥3 periods of estrous observation daily or the use of estrous detection aids that continuously monitor cows. Finally, the study reiterated the importance of maximising body condition score and days in milk at breeding to increase behavioural expression of estrus and pregnancy per AI.


Subject(s)
Insemination, Artificial , Lactation , Animals , Cattle , Estrus , Estrus Synchronization , Female , Insemination, Artificial/veterinary , Pregnancy , Progesterone , Reproduction
2.
J Dairy Sci ; 103(12): 12059-12068, 2020 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33069411

ABSTRACT

The objective was to use ovulation synchronization with timed artificial insemination (TAI) to evaluate the effect of timing of artificial insemination (AI) with frozen sex-sorted sperm on fertility performance in pasture-based compact calving herds. Ejaculates from 3 Holstein-Friesian bulls were split and processed to provide frozen sex-sorted sperm (SS) at 4 × 106 sperm per straw, and frozen conventional sperm at 15 × 106 sperm per straw (CONV). A modified Progesterone-Ovsynch protocol was used for estrous synchronization, with TAI occurring 16 h after the second GnRH injection for cows assigned to CONV, and either 16 h (SS-16) or 22 h (SS-22) for cows assigned to SS. Pregnancy diagnosis was conducted by transrectal ultrasound scanning of the uterus 35 to 40 d after TAI (n = 2,175 records available for analysis). Generalized linear mixed models were used to examine the effects of treatment on pregnancy per artificial insemination (P/AI). Fixed effects included treatment (n = 3), bull (n = 3), treatment by bull interaction, parity (n = 4), days-in-milk category (n = 3), and treatment by days-in-milk category, with herd (n = 24) included as a random effect. Pregnancy per AI was greater for CONV compared with both SS-16 and SS-22 (61.1%, 49.0%, and 51.3%, respectively), and the SS treatments did not differ from each other (relative P/AI for SS-16 and SS-22 vs. CONV were 80.2% and 84.0%, respectively). There were significant bull and treatment by bull interaction effects. Additional analysis was undertaken using a model that included herd as a fixed effect. This analysis identified marked herd-to-herd variation (within-herd relative P/AI for the combined SS treatments vs. CONV ranged from 48-121%). The tertile of herds with the best performance achieved a mean relative P/AI of 100% (range = 91-121%), indicating that P/AI equivalent to CONV is achievable with SS. Conversely, the tertile of herds with the poorest performance achieved a mean relative P/AI of 67% (range = 48-77%). We found that SS resulted in poorer overall P/AI compared with CONV sperm regardless of timing of AI. Marked variation existed between herds; however, one-third of herds achieved P/AI results equal to CONV. Identification of factors responsible for the large herd-to-herd variation in P/AI with SS, and development of strategies to reduce this variation, warrant further research.


Subject(s)
Cattle/physiology , Insemination, Artificial/veterinary , Lactation , Ovulation , Seasons , Spermatozoa , Animals , Estrus/drug effects , Estrus Synchronization/methods , Female , Fertility/drug effects , Freezing , Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone/pharmacology , Lactation/drug effects , Linear Models , Male , Milk , Ovulation/drug effects , Parity , Pregnancy , Progesterone/pharmacology , Sex Determination Processes , Spermatozoa/drug effects , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...