Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
World J Gastroenterol ; 30(10): 1280-1286, 2024 Mar 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38596495

ABSTRACT

Yu et al's study in the World Journal of Gastroenterology (2023) introduced a novel regimen of Vonoprazan-amoxicillin dual therapy combined with Saccharomyces boulardii (S. boulardii) for the rescue therapy against Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori), a pathogen responsible for peptic ulcers and gastric cancer. Vonoprazan is a potassium-competitive acid blocker renowned for its rapid and long-lasting acid suppression, which is minimally affected by mealtime. Compared to proton pump inhibitors, which bind irreversibly to cysteine residues in the H+/K+-ATPase pump, Vonoprazan competes with the K+ ions, prevents the ions from binding to the pump and blocks acid secretion. Concerns with increasing antibiotic resistance, effects on the gut microbiota, patient compliance, and side effects have led to the advent of a dual regimen for H. pylori. Previous studies suggested that S. boulardii plays a role in stabilizing the gut barrier which improves H. pylori eradication rate. With an acceptable safety profile, the dual-adjunct regimen was effective regardless of prior treatment failure and antibiotic resistance profile, thereby strengthening the applicability in clinical settings. Nonetheless, S. boulardii comes in various formulations and dosages, warranting further exploration into the optimal dosage for supplementation in rescue therapy. Additionally, larger, randomized, double-blinded controlled trials are warranted to confirm these promising results.


Subject(s)
Helicobacter Infections , Helicobacter pylori , Pyrroles , Saccharomyces boulardii , Sulfonamides , Humans , Amoxicillin/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Helicobacter Infections/drug therapy , Clarithromycin/therapeutic use , Drug Therapy, Combination , Proton Pump Inhibitors/adverse effects , H(+)-K(+)-Exchanging ATPase , Ions/pharmacology , Ions/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome
2.
Curr Diabetes Rev ; 18(9): e090222200945, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35139792

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular diseases, obesity, and dyslipidaemia are considered risk factors for more severe forms of COVID-19 infection. Statins have been widely used in such patients to prevent the occurrence of cardiovascular events and the associated mortality. However, statin use has been suggested to promote a more severe form of infection. This review aims to investigate the association between statin use and poor outcomes in COVID-19 patients with diabetes. METHODS: Literature search was performed in PubMed, CENTRAL, Scopus, and pre-print databases (MedRxiv and BioRxiv), and studies published up to March 6th, 2021 have been reviewed. Selected studies were then assessed for risk of bias with the Newcastle Ottawa Scale. RESULT: Four studies were included in the final analysis; all were retrospective studies. Two studies reported a decreased risk of mortality with statin use, while one study reported opposite findings. The other one did not find a significant association between statin use and poor COVID-19 outcomes. CONCLUSION: Available data suggest that statins may be safely administered to diabetic COVID-19 patients as the majority of evidence signifies statins to confer benefits and improve clinical outcomes in COVID-19 patients.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Diabetes Mellitus , Dyslipidemias , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors , Diabetes Mellitus/drug therapy , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Dyslipidemias/drug therapy , Dyslipidemias/epidemiology , Humans , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies
3.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract ; 171: 108561, 2021 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33310127

ABSTRACT

AIMS: To investigate the prognostic value of admission blood glucose (BG) in predicting COVID-19 outcomes, including poor composite outcomes (mortality/severity), mortality, and severity. METHODS: Eligible studies evaluating the association between admission fasting BG (FBG) and random BG (RBG) levels with COVID-19 outcomes were included and assessed for risk of bias with the Quality in Prognosis Studies tool. Random-effects dose-response meta-analysis was conducted to investigate potential linear or non-linear exposure-response gradient. RESULTS: The search yielded 35 studies involving a total of 14,502 patients. We discovered independent association between admission FBG and poor COVID-19 prognosis. Furthermore, we demonstrated non-linear relationship between admission FBG and severity (Pnon-linearity < 0.001), where each 1 mmol/L increase augmented the risk of severity by 33% (risk ratio 1.33 [95% CI: 1.26-1.40]). Albeit exhibiting similar trends, study scarcity limited the evidence strength on the independent prognostic value of admission RBG. GRADE assessment yielded high-quality evidence for the association between admission FBG and COVID-19 severity, and moderate-quality evidence for its association with mortality and poor outcomes. CONCLUSION: High admission FBG level independently predicted poor COVID-19 prognosis. Further research to confirm the prognostic value of admission RBG and to ascertain the estimated dose-response risk between admission FBG and COVID-19 severity are required.


Subject(s)
Blood Glucose/analysis , COVID-19/mortality , Diabetes Mellitus/mortality , Hyperglycemia/physiopathology , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/transmission , COVID-19/virology , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus/metabolism , Diabetes Mellitus/virology , Humans , Prognosis , Risk Factors , Survival Rate
4.
Brain Behav ; 10(10): e01787, 2020 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32812380

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The potential of telestroke implementation in resource-limited areas has yet to be systematically evaluated. This study aims to investigate the implementation of telestroke on acute stroke care in rural areas. METHODS: Eligible studies published up to November 2019 were included in this study. Randomized trials were further evaluated for risk of bias with Cochrane RoB 2, while nonrandomized studies with ROBINS-I tool. Random effects model was utilized to estimate effect sizes, and the certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) tool. RESULTS: The search yielded 19 studies involving a total of 28,496 subjects, comprising of prehospital and in-hospital telestroke interventions in the form of mobile stroke units and hub-and-spoke hospitals network, respectively. Telestroke successfully increased the proportion of patients treated ≤3 hr (OR 2.15; 95% CI 1.37-3.40; I2  = 0%) and better three-month functional outcome (OR 1.29; 95% CI 1.01-1.63; I2  = 44%) without increasing symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage rate (OR 1.27; 0.65-2.49; I2  = 0%). Furthermore, telestroke was also associated with shorter onset-to-treatment time (mean difference -27.97 min; 95% CI -35.51, -20.42; I2  = 63%) and lower in-hospital mortality rate (OR 0.67; 95% CI 0.52-0.87; I2  = 0%). GRADE assessments yielded low-to-moderate certainty of body evidences. CONCLUSION: Telestroke implementation in rural areas was associated with better clinical outcomes as compared to usual care. Its integration in both prehospital and in-hospital settings could help optimize emergency stroke approach. Further studies with higher-level evidence are needed to confirm these findings.


Subject(s)
Stroke , Telemedicine , Critical Care , Humans , Intracranial Hemorrhages , Stroke/drug therapy , Thrombolytic Therapy
5.
Oncol Rev ; 13(2): 425, 2019 Jul 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31857857

ABSTRACT

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is associated with worse prognosis, with limited treatment regiments available and higher mortality rate. Immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) or programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) showed great potentials in treating malignancies and may serve as potential therapies for TNBC. This systematic review aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety profiles of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in the treatment of TNBC. Literature search was performed via PubMed, EBSCOhost, Scopus, and CENTRAL databases, selecting studies which evaluated the use of anti-PD-1/PDL1 for TNBC from inception until February 2019. Risk of bias was assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Overall, 7 studies evaluating outcomes of 1395 patients with TNBC were included in this systematic review. Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 showed significant antitumor effect, proven by their promising response (objective response rate (ORR), 18.5-39.4%) and survival rates (median overall survival (OS), 9.2-21.3 months). Moreover, anti- PD-1/PD-L1 yielded better outcomes when given as first-line therapy, and overexpression of PD-L1 in tumors showed better therapeutic effects. On the other hands, safety profiles were similar across agents and generally acceptable, with grade ≥3 treatment- related adverse effects (AEs) ranging from 9.5% to 15.6% and no new AEs were experienced by TNBC patients. Most grade ≥3 AEs are immune-mediated, which are manifested as neutropenia, fatigue, peripheral neuropathy, and anemia. PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors showed promising efficacy and tolerable AEs, and thus may benefit TNBC patients. Further studies of randomized controlled trials with larger populations are needed to better confirm the potential of these agents.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...