Dose-response to a two-component acellular pertussis vaccine in infants and comparison with whole-cell vaccine.

In an effort to determine the optimal dose of pertussis toxoid (PT) and filamentous haemagglutinin (FHA) for use in acellular pertussis vaccines we compared the immunogenicity and safety of acellular pertussis vaccine combined with diphtheria and tetanus toxoids containing 12.5 microg (DTaP-12.5) or 25 microg (DTaP-25) each of PT and FHA with a whole cell pertussis vaccine in infants immunized at 2, 4 and 6 months of age. Recipients of acellular vaccines developed higher anti-FHA concentrations and more rapid anti-PT serological responses that infants who received whole cell pertussis vaccine combined with diphtheria and tetanus toxoids (DPT). A dose response was noted; infants immunized with DTaP-25 developed significantly (P<0.03) higher anti-FHA and anti-PT levels than infants who received DTaP-12.5. No rise in the agglutinin titres was noted for recipients of the acellular vaccines although this vaccine stimulated increases in agglutinins when given as the fourth or fifth dose to children who had received three doses of DTP. The rates of erythema, induration, pain, irritability, crying, increased sleepiness, and decreased appetite were significantly (P

Dose-response to acellular pertussis vaccine and comparison with whole cell pertussis vaccine at 15-24 months and 4-6 years of age. Acellular Pertussis Vaccine Study Team.

In a randomized double-blind trial 55 children of 15-24 months and 56 children of 4-6 years of age previously immunized with whole-cell DTP (WC-DTP) received acellular pertussis DTP vaccines containing 12.5 micrograms (AC-12.5) or 25 micrograms (AC-25) each of pertussis toxoid (PT) and filamentous haemagglutinin (FHA) per dose of WC-DTP. No differences in antibody responses or adverse events were noted for children who received AC-25 as compared with AC-12.5. All three groups had significant increases in pertussis agglutinins, but the geometric mean titre (GMT) for 4-6-year-old children who received WC-DTP was higher than the GMT for children who received acellular vaccine. No significant differences were noted in the GMT of antibodies to FHA or PT between children who received WC-DTP and recipients of acellular vaccine. The rates of several adverse reactions were significantly (p less than or equal to 0.05) higher for recipients of WC-DTP, and children given WC-DTP were significantly (p less than or equal to 0.00001) more likely to have received acetaminophen. These acellular vaccines are safe and as immunogenic for FHA and PT as WC-DTP when administered as the fourth or fifth dose to children who received three doses of WC-DTP in infancy. The lower (12.5 micrograms) dose of acellular vaccine was as effective as the higher (25 micrograms) dose in inducing antibodies to FHA and PT in children 15-24 months and 4-6 years of age.

Antibody responses to Haemophilus influenzae type B vaccines in men with human immunodeficiency virus infection.

BACKGROUND: Persons with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection are at increased risk for serious infections caused by Haemophilus influenzae, yet there are few data on their antibody responses to the H. influenzae type b vaccines. METHODS: We evaluated antibody responses in 248 men who were randomly assigned to receive a single dose of either the H. influenzae type b polysaccharide (PRP) vaccine or the polysaccharide-mutant diphtheria toxoid conjugate vaccine (PRP-CRM). The subjects were stratified into four groups: seronegative men (67 subjects), men with asymptomatic HIV infection (79), men with symptomatic HIV infection (47), and men with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) (55). RESULTS: Before immunization, the subjects with AIDS had the lowest PRP-antibody titers; 40 percent had titers below the putative protective level (less than 0.15 micrograms per milliliter). In the seronegative subjects, those with asymptomatic HIV infection, and those with symptomatic HIV infection, the PRP-CRM vaccine led to a threefold greater increase in geometric mean antibody titers than did the PRP vaccine (P less than 0.01). However, the subjects with AIDS had a greater antibody response to the PRP vaccine. The antibody response of HIV-seropositive men to the PRP-CRM vaccine correlated significantly with the number of CD4 lymphocytes (r = 0.47, P less than 0.0001, as compared with r = -0.01 for the PRP vaccine). In these HIV-infected men, both vaccines elicited the dominant anti-PRP idiotype described previously in populations not infected with HIV. CONCLUSIONS: Immunization with the PRP-CRM conjugate vaccine early in the course of HIV infection is likely to confer protection against disease caused by H. influenzae type b.

Preventability of malpractice claims in emergency medicine: a closed claims study.

We conducted a retrospective study of 262 malpractice claims against emergency physicians insured in Massachusetts by the state-mandated insurance carrier; these 262 claims were closed in the years 1980 through 1987. A total of $11,800,156 in indemnity and expenses was spent for these 262 claims. In 211 cases, the allegation was failure to diagnose a medical or surgical problem. One hundred eighty-four of these cases were included in the following eight diagnostic categories: chest pain, abdominal pain, wounds, fractures, pediatric fever/meningitis, aortic aneurysm, central nervous system bleeding, and epiglottitis. These eight categories accounted for 66.44% of the total dollars spent for the 262 claims. Because of the high incidence and dollar losses attached to these eight diagnostic categories, the Massachusetts Chapter of the American College of Emergency Physicians (MACEP) has developed clinical guidelines for the evaluation of these high-risk areas. Of the 184 high-risk claims, 99 claim files were reviewed; 45 of these reviewed claims were judged by physician reviewers as preventable by the application of the MACEP high risk clinical guidelines. From 22.26% to 46.4% of the $11,800,156 spent on the 262 claims could have been saved by the application of the MACEP clinical guidelines.