Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
Thromb Res ; 231: 58-64, 2023 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37806116

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of pulmonary embolism (PE) is approximately 11-17 % in patients with an acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AE-COPD). The optimal diagnostic strategy for PE in these patients remains undetermined. AIMS: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of standard (revised Geneva and Wells PE scores combined with fixed D-dimer cut-off) and computed tomography pulmonary angiogram (CTPA)-sparing diagnostic strategies (ADJUST-PE, YEARS, PEGeD, 4PEPS) in patients with AE-COPD. METHOD: Post-hoc analyses of data from the multicenter prospective PEP study were performed. The primary outcome was the diagnostic failure rate of venous thromboembolism (VTE) during the entire study period. Secondary outcomes included diagnostic failure rate of PE and deep venous thrombosis (DVT), respectively, during the entire study period and the number of CTPA needed per diagnostic strategy. RESULTS: 740 patients were included. The revised Geneva and Wells PE scores combined with fixed D-dimer cut-off had a diagnostic failure rate of VTE of 0.7 % (95%CI 0.3 %-1.7 %), but >70.0 % of the patients needed imaging. All CTPA-sparing diagnostic algorithms reduced the need for CTPAs (-10.1 % to -32.4 %, depending on the algorithm), at the cost of an increased VTE diagnosis failure rate of up to 2.1 % (95%CI 1.2 %-3.4 %). CONCLUSION: Revised Geneva and Wells PE scores combined with fixed D-dimer cut-off were safe, but a high number of CTPA remained needed. CTPA-sparing algorithms would reduce imaging, at the cost of an increased VTE diagnosis failure rate that exceeds the safety threshold. Further studies are needed to improve diagnostic management in this population.


Subject(s)
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive , Pulmonary Embolism , Venous Thromboembolism , Humans , Venous Thromboembolism/diagnosis , Venous Thromboembolism/epidemiology , Prospective Studies , Pulmonary Embolism/complications , Pulmonary Embolism/diagnosis , Pulmonary Embolism/epidemiology , Algorithms , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/complications , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/diagnosis , Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products
3.
Eur J Nutr ; 61(4): 2051-2066, 2022 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34999930

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Particular interest is now given to the potential of dietary supplements as alternative non-pharmacological approaches in intestinal inflammation handling. In this aim, this study evaluates the efficiency of fish collagen peptides, Naticol®Gut, on colonic inflammation. METHODS: Wild type and Mannose receptor-deficient in the myeloid lineage C57BL/6 mice were administered with Dextran Sodium Sulfate (DSS), Naticol®Gut, DSS, and Naticol®Gut or only water for 4 or 8 days. Inflammatory status was evaluated by establishing macroscopic and microscopic scores, by measuring cytokine and calprotectin production by ELISA and the myeloperoxidase activity by chemiluminescence. Colonic macrophages were phenotyped by measuring mRNA levels of specific markers of inflammation and oxidative status. Colonic immune populations and T-cell activation profiles were determined by flow cytometry. Mucosa-associated gut microbiota assessment was undertaken by qPCR. The phenotype of human blood monocytes from inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) subjects was characterized by RT-qPCR and flow cytometry and their oxidative activity by chemiluminescence. RESULTS: Naticol®Gut-treated DSS mice showed attenuated colonic inflammation compared to mice that were only exposed to DSS. Naticol®Gut activity was displayed through its ability to orient the polarization of colonic macrophage towards an anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant phenotype after its recognition by the mannose receptor. Subsequently, Naticol®Gut delivery modulated CD4 T cells in favor of a Th2 response and dampened CD8 T-cell activation. This immunomodulation resulted in an intestinal eubiosis. In human monocytes from IBD subjects, the treatment with Naticol®Gut also restored an anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant phenotype. CONCLUSION: Naticol®Gut acts as a protective agent against colitis appearing as a new functional food and an innovative and complementary approach in gut health.


Subject(s)
Colitis , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases , Animals , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/therapeutic use , Antioxidants/therapeutic use , Colitis/chemically induced , Colitis/drug therapy , Collagen , Colon , Dextran Sulfate , Disease Models, Animal , Humans , Inflammation/drug therapy , Macrophages , Mannose/therapeutic use , Mannose Receptor , Mice , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Peptides , Phenotype
4.
Rev Prat ; 69(5): 535-536, 2019 May.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31626463

ABSTRACT

Nitrous oxide is increasingly consumed during parties for its euphoric properties. But unfortunately, in several cases it leads to real addictions. Unfortunately because its use leads to neurological, psychiatric, pulmonary and even death -by hypoxia-. It is important that the medical community be informed. It is important that the medical community be informed that in the face of atypical and poorly explained disorders doctors may think about the use of laughing gas, especially among young students.


Le protoxyde d'azote est de plus en plus consommé lors des soirées pour ses vertus euphorisantes. Mais malheureusement, il aboutit dans un certain nombre de cas à de véritables addictions. Malheureusement car son utilisation conduit à des pathologies neurologiques, psychiatriques, pulmonaires et même à des décès -par hypoxie-. Il est important que la communauté médicale soit informée et que devant des troubles atypiques et mal expliqués les médecins puissent évoquer l'emploi du gaz hilarant surtout chez les jeunes étudiants.


Subject(s)
Nitrous Oxide , Asphyxia/chemically induced , Humans , Nitrous Oxide/adverse effects , Polyneuropathies/chemically induced
6.
Trials ; 19(1): 260, 2018 May 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29716637

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Acute pain is a common condition among prehospital patients and prompt management is pivotal. Opioids are the most frequently analgesics used in the prehospital setting. However, opioids are highly addictive, and some patients may develop opioid dependence, even when they are exposed to brief opioid treatments. Therefore, alternative non-opioid analgesia should be developed to manage pain in the prehospital setting. Used at subdissociative doses, ketamine, a noncompetitive N-methyl-D-aspartate and glutamate receptor antagonist, provides analgesic effects accompanied by preservation of protective airway reflexes. In this context, we will carry out a randomized controlled, open-label, multicenter trial to compare a subdissociative dose of ketamine to morphine to provide pain relief in the prehospital setting, in patients with traumatic and non-traumatic pain. METHODS/DESIGN: This will be a multicenter, single-blind, randomized controlled trial. Consecutive adults will be enrolled in the prehospital setting if they experience moderate to severe, acute, non-traumatic and traumatic pain, defined as a numeric rating scale score greater or equal to 5. Patients will be randomized to receive ketamine or morphine by intravenous push. The primary outcome will be the between-group difference in mean change in numeric rating scale pain scores measured from the time before administration of the study medication to 30 min later. DISCUSSION: This upcoming randomized clinical trial was design to assess the efficacy and safety of ketamine, an alternative non-opiate analgesia, to manage non-traumatic and traumatic pain in the prehospital setting. We aim to provide evidence to change prescribing practices to reduce exposition to opioids and the subsequent risk of addiction. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT03236805 . Registered on 2 August 2017.


Subject(s)
Acute Pain/prevention & control , Analgesics, Opioid/administration & dosage , Anesthetics, Dissociative/administration & dosage , Emergency Medical Services/methods , Ketamine/administration & dosage , Morphine/administration & dosage , Pain Management/methods , Acute Pain/diagnosis , Acute Pain/physiopathology , Acute Pain/psychology , Administration, Intravenous , Analgesics, Opioid/adverse effects , Anesthetics, Dissociative/adverse effects , France , Humans , Ketamine/adverse effects , Morphine/adverse effects , Multicenter Studies as Topic , Pain Management/adverse effects , Pain Measurement , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Single-Blind Method , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
7.
JAMA ; 319(8): 779-787, 2018 02 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29486039

ABSTRACT

Importance: Bag-mask ventilation (BMV) is a less complex technique than endotracheal intubation (ETI) for airway management during the advanced cardiac life support phase of cardiopulmonary resuscitation of patients with out-of-hospital cardiorespiratory arrest. It has been reported as superior in terms of survival. Objectives: To assess noninferiority of BMV vs ETI for advanced airway management with regard to survival with favorable neurological function at day 28. Design, Settings, and Participants: Multicenter randomized clinical trial comparing BMV with ETI in 2043 patients with out-of-hospital cardiorespiratory arrest in France and Belgium. Enrollment occurred from March 9, 2015, to January 2, 2017, and follow-up ended January 26, 2017. Intervention: Participants were randomized to initial airway management with BMV (n = 1020) or ETI (n = 1023). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was favorable neurological outcome at 28 days defined as cerebral performance category 1 or 2. A noninferiority margin of 1% was chosen. Secondary end points included rate of survival to hospital admission, rate of survival at day 28, rate of return of spontaneous circulation, and ETI and BMV difficulty or failure. Results: Among 2043 patients who were randomized (mean age, 64.7 years; 665 women [32%]), 2040 (99.8%) completed the trial. In the intention-to-treat population, favorable functional survival at day 28 was 44 of 1018 patients (4.3%) in the BMV group and 43 of 1022 patients (4.2%) in the ETI group (difference, 0.11% [1-sided 97.5% CI, -1.64% to infinity]; P for noninferiority = .11). Survival to hospital admission (294/1018 [28.9%] in the BMV group vs 333/1022 [32.6%] in the ETI group; difference, -3.7% [95% CI, -7.7% to 0.3%]) and global survival at day 28 (55/1018 [5.4%] in the BMV group vs 54/1022 [5.3%] in the ETI group; difference, 0.1% [95% CI, -1.8% to 2.1%]) were not significantly different. Complications included difficult airway management (186/1027 [18.1%] in the BMV group vs 134/996 [13.4%] in the ETI group; difference, 4.7% [95% CI, 1.5% to 7.9%]; P = .004), failure (69/1028 [6.7%] in the BMV group vs 21/996 [2.1%] in the ETI group; difference, 4.6% [95% CI, 2.8% to 6.4%]; P < .001), and regurgitation of gastric content (156/1027 [15.2%] in the BMV group vs 75/999 [7.5%] in the ETI group; difference, 7.7% [95% CI, 4.9% to 10.4%]; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with out-of-hospital cardiorespiratory arrest, the use of BMV compared with ETI failed to demonstrate noninferiority or inferiority for survival with favorable 28-day neurological function, an inconclusive result. A determination of equivalence or superiority between these techniques requires further research. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02327026.


Subject(s)
Advanced Cardiac Life Support/methods , Intubation, Intratracheal , Laryngeal Masks , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/therapy , Aged , Belgium , Emergency Medical Services , Female , France , Humans , Intention to Treat Analysis , Male , Middle Aged , Nervous System Diseases/etiology , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/complications , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/mortality
8.
Am J Emerg Med ; 32(6): 655-9, 2014 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24613655

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Midazolam comedication with morphine is a routine practice in pre and postoperative patients but has not been evaluated in prehospital setting. We aimed to evaluate the comedication effect of midazolam in the prehospital traumatic adults. METHODS: A prehospital prospective randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial of intravenous morphine 0.10 mg/kg and midazolam 0.04 mg/kg vs morphine 0.10 mg/kg and placebo. Pain assessment was done using a validated numeric rating scale (NRS). The primary end point was to achieve an efficient analgesic effect (NRS≤3) 20 minutes after the baseline. The secondary end points were treatment safety, total morphine dose required until obtaining NRS≤3, and efficient analgesic effect 30 minutes after the baseline. FINDINGS: Ninety-one patients were randomized into midazolam (n=41) and placebo (n=50) groups. No significant difference in proportion of patients with a pain score≤3 was observed between midazolam (43.6%) and placebo (45.7%) after 20 minutes (P=.849). Secondary end points were similar in regard with proportion of patients with a pain score≤3 at T30, the side effects and adverse events except for drowsiness in midazolam vs placebo, 43.6% vs 6.5% (P<.001). No significant difference in total morphine dose was observed, that is, midazolam (14.09 mg±6.64) vs placebo (15.53 mg±6.27) (P=.315). CONCLUSIONS: According to our study, midazolam does not enhance pain control as an adjunctive to morphine regimen in the management of trauma-induced pain in prehospital setting. However, such midazolam use seems to be associated with an increase in drowsiness.


Subject(s)
Acute Pain/drug therapy , Emergency Medical Services/methods , Hypnotics and Sedatives/therapeutic use , Midazolam/therapeutic use , Pain Management/methods , Wounds and Injuries/drug therapy , Acute Pain/etiology , Adult , Analgesics, Opioid/administration & dosage , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Double-Blind Method , Drug Synergism , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Humans , Hypnotics and Sedatives/administration & dosage , Male , Midazolam/administration & dosage , Morphine/administration & dosage , Morphine/therapeutic use , Wounds and Injuries/complications
10.
Presse Med ; 33(12 Pt 1): 826-9, 2004 Jul 10.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15343102

ABSTRACT

A DIAGNOSIS TO BE EVOKED: The Brugada syndrome is a rare but serious inherited disease that causes sudden cardiac death by ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation, especially in younger men. Diagnostic problems are related to the possible absence of symptoms although the electrocardiogram (ECG) reveals the characteristics of a Brugada syndrome and to the variations in the ECG in the same patient over time. THREE ELECTROCARDIOLOGICAL ASPECTS: Type 1 corresponds to the historical description with ST segment elevation at point J of at least 3 mm from its summit and upward convex ST segment followed by a negative T wave. In Type 2, the extent of point I is of 2 mm, the ST segment has a saddle form and remains at least 1 mm above the isoelectric line, the T wave is positive or biphasic. In Type 3, the terminal section of the ST segment never exceeds 1 mm above the isoelectric line. In the case of a Type 1 ECG, a pharmacodynamic test is of no interest. REGARDING TREATMENT: The only treatment to have demonstrated its efficacy is the implantable automatic defibrillator, indicated in symptomatic patients.


Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation/pathology , Death, Sudden, Cardiac/etiology , Defibrillators, Implantable , Tachycardia, Ventricular/pathology , Adult , Age Factors , Atrial Fibrillation/complications , Atrial Fibrillation/therapy , Diagnosis, Differential , Electrocardiography , Humans , Male , Syndrome , Tachycardia, Ventricular/complications , Tachycardia, Ventricular/therapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...