Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
RSC Med Chem ; 14(5): 869-879, 2023 May 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37252094

ABSTRACT

Four coumarin-triazole hybrids were selected from our in house library and screened for cytotoxic activity on A549 (lung cancer), HepG2 (liver cancer), J774A1 (mouse sarcoma macrophage), MCF7 (breast cancer), OVACAR (ovarian cancer), RAW (murine leukaemia macrophage), and SiHa (uterus carcinoma) and their in vitro toxicity was assessed on 3T3 (healthy fibroblasts) cell lines. SwissADME pharmacokinetic prediction was performed. Effects on ROS production, mitochondrial membrane potential, apoptosis/necrosis and DNA damage were evaluated. All of the hybrids have good pharmacokinetic predictions. Each of them showed cytotoxic activity against the MCF7 breast cancer cell line, with IC50 between 2.66 and 10.08 µM, lower than cisplatin (45.33 µM) for the same test. One can observe an order of reactivity from the most potent: LaSOM 186 > LaSOM 190 > LaSOM 185 > LaSOM 180, with a better selectivity index than the reference drug cisplatin and the precursor hymecromone, and caused cell death by apoptosis induction. Two compounds showed antioxidant activity in vitro and three disrupted the mitochondrial membrane potential. None of the hybrids caused genotoxic damage to healthy 3T3 cells. All hybrids showed potential for further optimization, mechanism elucidation, in vivo activity and toxicity tests.

2.
Curr Med Chem ; 29(32): 5270-5288, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35352642

ABSTRACT

The discovery of a new drug requires over a billion dollars and around 12 years of research efforts, and toxicity is the leading reason for the failure to approve candidate drugs. Many alternative methods have been validated to detect toxicity as early as possible to diminish the waste of resources and efforts in medicinal chemistry research, and in vivo alternative methods are especially valuable for the amount of information they can provide at little cost and in a short time. In this work, we present a review of the literature published between the years 2000 and 2021 on in vivo alternative methods of toxicity screening employed in medicinal chemistry, which we believe will be useful because, in addition to shortening the research time, these studies provide much additional information aside from the toxicity of drug candidate compounds. These in vivo models include zebrafish, Artemia salina, Galleria mellonella, Drosophila melanogaster, planarians, and Caenorhabditis elegans. The most published ones in the last decade were zebrafish, D. melanogaster, and C. elegans due to their reliability, ease, and cost-effectiveness in implementation and flexibility. Special attention is given to C. elegans because of its rising popularity, a wide range of uses, including toxicity screening, and active effects measurement, from antioxidant effects to anthelmintic and antimicrobial activities, and its fast and reliable results. Over time, C. elegans also became a viable high-throughput (HTS) automated drug screening option. Additionally, this manuscript lists briefly the other screening methods used for the initial toxicological analyses and the role of alternative in vivo methods in these scenarios, classifying them as in silico, in vitro and alternative in vivo models that have been receiving a growing increase in interest in recent years.


Subject(s)
Caenorhabditis elegans , Drosophila melanogaster , Animals , Antioxidants/pharmacology , Drug Discovery/methods , Reproducibility of Results , Zebrafish
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...