Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Infect Dis ; 191(7): 1116-22, 2005 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15747247

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A phase 2 trial was conducted to assess in young infants the safety, tolerability, infectivity, and immunogenicity of multiple doses of an intranasal vaccine using bovine parainfluenza virus type 3 (bPIV3). METHODS: One hundred ninety-two healthy 2-month-old infants were randomized 1 : 1 : 1 to receive 1x10(5) median tissue culture infective dose (TCID(50)) bPIV3 vaccine, 1x10(6) TCID(50) bPIV3 vaccine, or placebo at 2, 4, 6, and 12-15 months of age. Safety information was collected by use of diary sheets and telephone interviews. Nasal wash and serum specimens were collected for assessment of infectivity and immunogenicity. RESULTS: The safety profiles of both dosages of bPIV3 were similar to that of placebo, with the exception of fever with temperature of >/=38.1 degrees C after dose 2 only, occurring in 34% of the 1x10(5) TCID(50) group, 35% of the 1x10(6) TCID(50) group, and 12% of the placebo group (P<.01). No vaccine-related serious adverse events were reported. The cumulative vaccine infectivity (isolation of bPIV3 and/or bPIV3 seroconversion) after dose 3 was similar in the 2 vaccine groups (87% in the 1x10(5) TCID(50) group and 77% in the 1x10(6) TCID(50) group) (P=.46). Seroconversion rates after dose 3, assessed by means of hemagglutination inhibition assay, after adjustment for decrease in maternal antibody titers, were 67% in the 1x10(5) TCID(50) group, 57% in the 1x10(6) TCID(50) group, and 12% in the placebo group (P<.01). Isolation of bPIV3 was common after dose 1, dose 2, or dose 3, but only 1 of 51 participants in the vaccine groups had bPIV3 isolated after dose 4. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple doses of bPIV3 vaccine were well tolerated and immunogenic in young infants.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/blood , Parainfluenza Vaccines/adverse effects , Parainfluenza Vaccines/immunology , Parainfluenza Virus 3, Bovine/immunology , Parainfluenza Virus 3, Human/immunology , Respirovirus Infections/prevention & control , Administration, Intranasal , Hemagglutination Inhibition Tests , Humans , Infant , Nasal Lavage Fluid/immunology , Nasal Lavage Fluid/virology , Parainfluenza Vaccines/administration & dosage , United States
2.
Pediatr Infect Dis J ; 23(9): 852-6, 2004 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15361726

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) assay is the standard method for evaluating inactivated influenza vaccines, but no standard assay has been established for evaluating live attenuated influenza vaccines (LAIV). LAIV containing A/Beijing/262/95(H1N1) induced low serum HAI antibody responses to the antigenic variant, A/New Caledonia/20/99(H1N1) in a serologic study but provided protection against the A/New Caledonia-like viruses in a community study. Neutralization and HAI assays were compared by measuring H1N1 cross-reactive antibody responses to the LAIV in children. METHODS: Sera were collected from 50 children 1-8 years of age before vaccination and 4-6 weeks after each dose of the LAIV. Antibody titers to the 3 vaccine viruses were measured by the HAI assay, whereas antibody titers against the H1N1 vaccine virus (A/Beijing/262/95) and 2 H1N1 antigenic variants (A/Shenzhen/227/95 and A/New Caledonia/20/99) were measured by the HAI and neutralization assays. RESULTS: Initially seronegative participants were more likely to develop HAI seroconversion responses to the 3 vaccine viruses than the baseline seropositive participants (77% versus 14% for H1N1, 100% versus 20% for H3N2, 100% versus 19% for B, P < 0.01, Fisher's exact test). For the H1N1 cross-reactive antibody responses, seroconversion rates measured by the neutralization assay were significantly higher than those measured by the HAI assay (95% versus 78%, P = 0.0485 for A/Beijing/262/95; 75% versus 24%, P < 0.0001 for A/Shenzhen/227/95; 51% versus 5%, P < 0.0001 for A/New Caledonia/20/99). CONCLUSIONS: The neutralization assay was more sensitive than the HAI assay for measuring H1N1 antibody responses after vaccination of children with the LAIV and may provide a better correlate of clinical protection provided by the LAIV.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/analysis , Influenza Vaccines/immunology , Influenza, Human/immunology , Vaccination , Antibody Formation/immunology , Child , Child, Preschool , Cohort Studies , Confidence Intervals , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hemagglutination Inhibition Tests , Humans , Immunization Schedule , Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Male , Probability , Vaccines, Attenuated/administration & dosage , Vaccines, Attenuated/immunology
3.
Vaccine ; 21(11-12): 1224-31, 2003 Mar 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12559802

ABSTRACT

This study was designed to compare the safety and immunogenicity of a trivalent live-attenuated, cold-adapted influenza vaccine (CAIV-T) blended and filled at two different manufacturing facilities (Medeva and Aviron-PA). The vaccines contained approximately 10(7) TCID(50) (median tissue culture infectious dose) of each of the three recommended 1997-1998 influenza vaccine components, A/Shenzhen/227/95 (H1N1) (A/Bayern/7/95 (H1N1)-like strain), A/Wuhan/359/95 (H3N2), and B/Ann Arbor/1/94 (B/Beijing/184/93-like strain). Two hundred and twenty-five healthy Australian children aged 12-42 months were enrolled and randomized in a 3:2 ratio to receive CAIV-T blended and filled either at Medeva or at Aviron-PA. Two doses of CAIV-T were given 4-6 weeks apart as an intranasal spray. Three blood specimens were collected (immediately before doses one and two, and 28 +/- 5 days following dose two) for measuring hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) antibody responses. Adverse events occurring within 10 days and serious adverse events occurring within 42 days were collected. Serum HAI antibody levels were measured against the three vaccine strains. Equivalent immunogenicity between the two vaccine groups was pre-specified as: (1) within 20% difference in seroconversion rates (HAI titers > or =4-fold rise); and (2) within 4-fold difference in the 90% confidence interval of geometric mean titer ratio. Among 10 pre-specified adverse events, only vomiting had significantly different incidence rates in the two vaccine groups following dose one (3% versus 13%, P = 0.01) but the difference disappeared following dose two (4% versus 4%). Differences in seroconversion rates following dose two between the two vaccine groups in pre-vaccination seronegative children were all <20% for the three vaccine strains (16% for H1N1, 0% for H3N2, and 0% for B). The results indicate that CAIV-T blended and filled in the two facilities had equivalent profiles of safety and immunogenicity.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/immunology , Drug Industry , Influenza Vaccines/immunology , Child, Preschool , Cold Temperature , Cross Reactions , Double-Blind Method , Female , Hemagglutination Inhibition Tests , Humans , Infant , Influenza A virus/immunology , Influenza B virus/immunology , Influenza Vaccines/adverse effects , Male , Prospective Studies , Safety , Vaccination , Vaccines, Attenuated/adverse effects , Vaccines, Attenuated/immunology , Vomiting/etiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...