Design, synthesis, biological activity evaluation and structure-activity relationships of new steroidal aromatase inhibitors. The case of C-ring and 7ß substituted steroids.

In this work, new steroidal aromatase inhibitors (AIs) were designed, synthesized, and tested. In one approach, C-ring substituted steroids namely those functionalized at C-11 position with an α or ß hydroxyl group or with a carbonyl group as well as C-9/C-11 steroidal olefins and epoxides were studied. It was found that the carbonyl group at C-11 is more beneficial for aromatase inhibition than the hydroxyl group, and that the C-ring epoxides were more potent than the C-ring olefins, leading to the discovery of a very strong AI, compound 7, with an IC50 of 0.011 µM, better than Exemestane, the steroidal AI in clinical use, which presents an IC50 of 0.050 µM. In another approach, we explored the biological activity of A-ring C-1/C-2 steroidal olefins and epoxides in relation to aromatase inhibition and compared it with the biological activity of C-ring C-9/C-11 steroidal olefins and epoxides. On the contrary to what was observed for the C-ring olefins and epoxides, the A-ring epoxides were less potent than A-ring olefins. Finally, the effect of 7ß-methyl substitution on aromatase inhibition was compared with 7α-methyl substitution, showing that 7ß-methyl is better than 7α-methyl substitution. Molecular modelling studies showed that the 7ß-methyl on C-7 seems to protrude into the opening to the access channel of aromatase in comparison to the 7α-methyl. This comparison led to find the best steroidal AI (12a) of this work with IC50 of 0.0058 µM. Compound 12a showed higher aromatase inhibition capacity than two of the three AIs currently in clinical use.

Effects of PI3K inhibition in AI-resistant breast cancer cell lines: autophagy, apoptosis, and cell cycle progression.

INTRODUCTION: Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in women. The aromatase inhibitors (AIs), Anastrozole (Ana), Letrozole (Let), and Exemestane (Exe) are a first-line treatment option for estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast tumors, in postmenopausal women. Nevertheless, the development of acquired resistance to this therapy is a major drawback. The involvement of PI3K in resistance, through activation of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR survival pathway or through a cytoprotective autophagic process, is widely described. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The involvement of autophagy in response to Ana and Let treatments and the effects of the combination of BYL-719, a PI3K inhibitor, with AIs were explored in AI-resistant breast cancer cell lines (LTEDaro, AnaR, LetR, and ExeR). RESULTS: We demonstrate that Ana and Let treatments do not promote autophagy in resistant breast cancer cells, contrary to Exe. Moreover, the combinations of BYL-719 with AIs decrease cell viability by different mechanisms by nonsteroidal vs. steroidal AIs. The combination of BYL-719 with Ana or Let induced cell cycle arrest while the combination with Exe promoted cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. In addition, BYL-719 decreased AnaR, LetR, and ExeR cell viability in a dose- and time-dependent manner, being more effective in the ExeR cell line. This decrease was further exacerbated by ICI 182,780. CONCLUSION: These results corroborate the lack of cross-resistance between AIs verified in the clinic, excluding autophagy as a mechanism of resistance to Ana or Let and supporting the ongoing clinical trials combining BYL-719 with AIs.

Differential biological effects of aromatase inhibitors: Apoptosis, autophagy, senescence and modulation of the hormonal status in breast cancer cells.

Estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast carcinomas are the most common subtype, corresponding to 60% of the cases in premenopausal and 75% in postmenopausal women. The third-generation of aromatase inhibitors (AIs), the non-steroidal Anastrozole (Ana) and Letrozole (Let) and the steroidal Exemestane (Exe), are considered a first-line endocrine therapy for postmenopausal women. Despite their clinical success, the development of resistance is the major setback in clinical practice. Nevertheless, the lack of cross-resistance between AIs hints that these drugs may act through distinct mechanisms. Therefore, this work studied the different effects induced by AIs on biological processes, such as cell proliferation, death, autophagy and senescence. Moreover, their effects on the regulation of the hormonal environment were also explored. The non-steroidal AIs induce senescence, through increased YPEL3 expression, on aromatase-overexpressing breast cancer cells (MCF-7aro), whereas Exe promotes a cytoprotective autophagy, thus blocking senescence induction. In addition, in a hormone-enriched environment, the non-steroidal AIs prevent estrogen signaling, despite up-regulating the estrogen receptor alpha (ERα), while Exe down-regulates ERα and maintains its activation. In these conditions, all AIs up-regulate the androgen receptor (AR) which blocks EGR3 transcription in Exe-treated cells. On the other hand, in hormone-depleted conditions, a crosstalk between AR and ERα occurs, enhancing the estrogenic effects of Exe. This indicates that Exe modulates both ERα and AR, while Ana and Let act as pure AIs. Thus, this study highlights the potential clinical benefit of combining AR antagonists with Exe and discourages the sequential use of Exe as second-line therapy in postmenopausal breast cancer.

The anti-cancer potential of crotoxin in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer: Its effects and mechanism of action.

Estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer is the most diagnosed subtype of breast cancer. Currently, aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are used as first-line treatment option in this type of tumors, however they cause several side effects, which is why new therapeutic approaches are demanding. The South American rattlesnake Crotalus durissus terrificus produces a venom enriched in several bioactive substances, like phospholipases A2 (PLA2). One of those is crotoxin, a ß-neurotoxin, that has already been reported for its anti-cancer properties in different cancers. Recently, its clinical interest has emerged and, in fact, a clinical trial in patients with advanced cancer is underway. Considering this, in this work, we studied the biological mechanisms behind the anti-cancer effects of crotoxin B (CTX) in an ER+ aromatase-overexpressing breast cancer cell line (MCF-7aro cells). Results revealed that CTX impairs MCF-7aro cells growth, through a cell cycle arrest at G2/M phase, inhibition of ERK1/2 pathway and by apoptosis through activation of caspase-8. In addition, it can be considered a safe natural compound as did not affect non-cancerous cells and only showed anti-growth effects in breast cancer cells. Therefore, this study represents an important landmark to better understand the effects and mechanisms of action of crotoxin in ER+ breast cancer.

Discovery of a multi-target compound for estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer: Involvement of aromatase and ERs.

Despite intense research, breast cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related death in women worldwide, being estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) the most common subtype. Nowadays, aromatase inhibitors (AIs), the selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) tamoxifen and the selective estrogen receptor down-regulator (SERD) fulvestrant are used as therapeutic options for ER+ breast cancer, since they interfere directly with the production of estrogens and with the activation of estrogen-dependent signaling pathways. Despite the success of these treatments, the occurrence of resistance limits their clinical efficacy, demanding the development of novel therapies. Recently, multi-target compounds emerged as promising therapeutic strategies for ER+ breast cancer, as they can potentially modulate several important targets simultaneously. In line with this, in this work, the anti-cancer properties and multi-target action of 1,1-Bis(4-hydroxyphenyl)-2-phenylbut-1-ene, tamoxifen bisphenol (1,1-BHPE), were evaluated in an ER+ breast cancer cell model (MCF-7aro cells). Molecular docking analysis predicted that 1,1-BHPE was able to bind to aromatase, ERα and ERß. In vitro studies showed that, although it did not present anti-aromatase activity, 1,1-BHPE reduced aromatase protein levels and interfered with ERα and ERß signaling pathways, acting as an ERα antagonist and inducing ERß up-regulation. Through these mechanisms, 1,1-BHPE was able to impair breast cancer growth and induce apoptosis. This represents an important therapeutic advantage because the main players responsible for estrogen production and signaling are modulated by a single compound. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study describing the anti-cancer properties of 1,1-BHPE as a multi-target compound specific for ER+ breast cancer.

The potential clinical benefit of targeting androgen receptor (AR) in estrogen-receptor positive breast cancer cells treated with Exemestane.

The development of acquired resistance to the aromatase inhibitors (AIs) used in clinic is being considered the major concern in estrogen-receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer therapy. Recently, androgen receptor (AR) has gained attention in the clinical setting, since it has been implicated in AIs-resistance, although, different roles for AR in cell fate have been described. In this work, our group elucidates, for the first time, the oncogenic role of AR in sensitive and resistant ER+ breast cancer cells treated with the potent third-generation steroidal AI Exemestane (Exe). We demonstrate that Exe promotes an overexpression/activation of AR, which has an oncogenic and pro-survival role in Exe-sensitive and Exe-resistant cells. Moreover, we also disclose that targeting AR with bicalutamide (CDX) in Exe-treated cells, enhances the efficacy of this AI in sensitive cells and re-sensitizes resistant cells to Exe treatment. Furthermore, by targeting AR in Exe-resistant cells, it is also possible to block the activation of the ERK1/2 and PI3K cell survival pathways, hamper ERα activation and increase ERß expression. Thus, this study, highlights a new mechanism involved in Exe-acquired resistance, implicating AR as a key molecule in this setting and suggesting that Exe-resistant cells may have an AR-dependent but ER-independent mechanism. Hence we propose AR antagonism as a potential and attractive therapeutic strategy to overcome Exe-acquired resistance or to enhance the growth inhibitory properties of Exe on ER+ breast cancer cells, improving breast cancer treatment.

Effects of new C6-substituted steroidal aromatase inhibitors in hormone-sensitive breast cancer cells: Cell death mechanisms and modulation of estrogen and androgen receptors.

Estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancers require estrogens for their growth. Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are considered the first-line therapy for this type of tumours. Despite the well-established clinical benefit of this therapy, the search for novel potent AIs that present higher efficacy and fewer side effects is still demanded. Thus, taking into account the known interactions of the natural substrate, androstenedione, within the aromatase active-site, a range of new steroidal compounds have been designed, synthesized and studied by our group. In this work, it was evaluated in MCF-7aro, an ER+ breast cancer cell line that overexpress aromatase, the anti-aromatase efficacy and the biological effects of eight new AIs: 6α-methyl-5α-androst-3-en-17-one (1a), 6α-methyl-3α,4α-epoxy-5α-androstan-17-one (3a), 6α-methylandrost-4-ene-3,17-dione (9), 6α-allylandrosta-1,4-diene-3,17-dione (13), 6α-allylandrost-4-ene-3,17-dione (15), 6α-allylandrost-4-en-17-one (17), 6ß-hydroxyandrost-4-ene-3,17-dione (19) and 6α-hydroxyandrost-4-ene-3,17-dione (20). Their anti-cancer properties were elucidated, as well as, the dependence of their mechanism of action on aromatase inhibition and/or on steroid receptors modulation, such as estrogen and androgen receptors, which are key targets for this type of cancer. Results demonstrate that the studied AIs present high anti-aromatase activity, disrupt MCF-7aro cell cycle progression and induce apoptosis, through the mitochondrial pathway. Compounds 1a, 3a, 9, 13, 15 and 17 exhibited an aromatase-dependent effect on cells and, interestingly, steroids 9 and 13 displayed the ability to decrease aromatase protein levels without affecting CYP19A1 mRNA levels. Furthermore, the effects of compounds 1a, 3a and 15 were dependent on ER and on AR modulation, whereas compounds 9 and 19 were only dependent on AR modulation. From a clinical point of view, these actions can be considered as a therapeutic advantage for this type of tumours. Thus, new promising AIs that impair ER+ breast cancer cell growth, by acting on aromatase, and even, on ER and AR were discovered. Furthermore, new insights on the most favourable structural modifications in the steroidal core structure were provided, helping to a more rational drug design of new and potent AIs.

A novel GC-MS methodology to evaluate aromatase activity in human placental microsomes: a comparative study with the standard radiometric assay.

Estrogens are key factors in the development of the estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer. Estrogens, estrone (E1), and estradiol (E2) production is achieved by aromatase, a cytochrome P450 enzyme that has androgens, androstenedione (AD), and testosterone (T) as substrates. Nowadays, third-generation aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are considered the gold-standard treatment for ER+ breast cancer in postmenopausal women as well as in premenopausal women with ovary ablation. Aromatase activity assessment still relies on radiometric assays that are expensive, hazardous, and non-environmentally friendly. Thus, in order to overcome these disadvantages, a new methodology was developed to evaluate aromatase activity, based on dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME) followed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). The enzymatic reaction was carried out in human placental microsomes, using AD as substrate, and the anti-aromatase activity was measured by determining the conversion percentage of AD into E1 (ratio E1/AD) using isotopic analogues as internal standards. The method showed good linearity (r2 = 0.9908 for AD and 0.9944 for E1), high accuracy (more than 74% for AD and more than 66% for E1), high extraction efficiency, and good intra-day and inter-day precision (below 14%, 4 levels). In this work, the IC50 values of the third-generation AIs, anastrozole, letrozole, and exemestane, obtained from the radiometric assay are also compared, and similar IC50 values are described. This method is a good alternative to the current radiometric assay, being fast and sensitive with a good extraction efficiency, accuracy, and recovery. In addition, it may be applied for the evaluation of the anti-aromatase activity of new potential AIs. Graphical abstract.