Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Front Vet Sci ; 10: 1165994, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37441557

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Effective identification and treatment of bovine respiratory disease (BRD) is an ongoing health and economic issue for the dairy and beef cattle industries. Bacteria pathogens Pasteurellamultocida, Mycoplasmabovis, Mannheimia haemolytica, and Histophilus somni and the virus Bovine herpesvirus-1 (BHV-1), Bovine parainfluenza-3 virus (BPIV-3), Bovine respiratory syncytial virus (BRSV), Bovine adenovirus 3 (BAdV3), bovine coronavirus (BoCV) and Bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) have commonly been identified in BRD cattle; however, no studies have investigated the fungal community and how it may also relate to BRD. Methods: The objective of this study was to understand if the nasal mycobiome differs between a BRD-affected (n = 56) and visually healthy (n = 73) Holstein steers. Fungal nasal community was determined by using Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) sequencing. Results: The phyla, Ascomycota and Basidiomycota, and the genera, Trichosporon and Issatchenkia, were the most abundant among all animals, regardless of health status. We identified differences between healthy and BRD animals in abundance of Trichosporon and Issatchenkia orientalis at a sub-species level that could be a potential indicator of BRD. No differences were observed in the nasal fungal alpha and beta diversity between BRD and healthy animals. However, the fungal community structure was affected based on season, specifically when comparing samples collected in the summer to the winter season. We then performed a random forest model, based on the fungal community and abundance of the BRD-pathobionts (qPCR data generated from a previous study using the same animals), to classify healthy and BRD animals and determine the agreement with visual diagnosis. Classification of BRD or healthy animals using ITS sequencing was low and agreed with the visual diagnosis with an accuracy of 51.9%. A portion of the ITS-predicted BRD animals were not predicted based on the abundance of BRD pathobionts. Lastly, fungal and bacterial co-occurrence were more common in BRD animals than healthy animals. Discussion: The results from this novel study provide a baseline understanding of the fungal diversity and composition in the nasal cavity of BRD and healthy animals, upon which future interaction studies, including other nasal microbiome members to further understand and accurately diagnose BRD, can be designed.

2.
Food Microbiol ; 110: 104173, 2023 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36462829

ABSTRACT

Fecal contamination of fresh produce from human and animal sources is a public health concern due to the risk of foodborne illnesses. The current standard laboratory procedures for microbiological analyses usually require an enrichment step that involves several hours. Molecular techniques such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR) have been used to directly detect pathogens from the samples, however, due to the low quantity of pathogen present and small volumes used for PCR, enrichment is usually required. Additionally, the need for specialized equipment and experienced workers hinders the use of these molecular techniques for field testing. Here, we developed a rapid risk-assessment assay for fecal contamination by targeting Bacteroidales using loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP). The assay allows for naked-eye observation of reactions with as few as ∼8 copies of Bacteroidales per cm2 of the surface in the field. We evaluated this assay with complex field samples as well as on-site field studies. Our on-field studies demonstrated that the Bacteroidales LAMP assay enables us to easily and quickly (<50 min) assess the risk of fecal contamination from animal operations, with a concordance of 85.3% when compared to lab-based qPCR. These results were obtained without expensive equipment (when compared to standard laboratory procedures). These assays could be used to determine site-specific risk and help the decision-making process of fresh produce growers.


Subject(s)
Biological Assay , Public Health , Animals , Humans , Feces , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction
3.
Anim Microbiome ; 4(1): 15, 2022 Feb 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35193707

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Bovine respiratory disease (BRD) is an ongoing health and economic challenge in the dairy and beef cattle industries. Multiple risk factors make an animal susceptible to BRD. The presence of Mannheimia haemolytica, Pasteurella multocida, Histophilus somni, and Mycoplasma bovis in lung tissues have been associated with BRD mortalities, but they are also commonly present in the upper respiratory tract of healthy animals. This study aims to compare the cattle nasal microbiome (diversity, composition and community interaction) and the abundance of BRD pathogens (by qPCR) in the nasal microbiome of Holstein steers that are apparently healthy (Healthy group, n = 75) or with BRD clinical signs (BRD group, n = 58). We then used random forest models based on nasal microbial community and qPCR results to classify healthy and BRD-affected animals and determined the agreement with the visual clinical signs. Additionally, co-occurring species pairs were identified in visually BRD or healthy animal groups. RESULTS: Cattle in the BRD group had lower alpha diversity than pen-mates in the healthy group. Amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) from Trueperella pyogenes, Bibersteinia and Mycoplasma spp. were increased in relative abundance in the BRD group, while ASVs from Mycoplasma bovirhinis and Clostridium sensu stricto were increased in the healthy group. Prevalence of H. somni (98%) and P. multocida (97%) was high regardless of BRD clinical signs whereas M. haemolytica (81 and 61%, respectively) and M. bovis (74 and 51%, respectively) were more prevalent in the BRD group than the healthy group. In the BRD group, the abundance of M. haemolytica and M. bovis was increased, while H. somni abundance was decreased. Visual observation of clinical signs agreed with classification by the nasal microbial community (misclassification rate of 32%) and qPCR results (misclassification rate 34%). Co-occurrence analysis demonstrated that the nasal microbiome of BRD-affected cattle presented fewer bacterial associations than healthy cattle. CONCLUSIONS: This study offers insight into the prevalence and abundance of BRD pathogens and the differences in the nasal microbiome between healthy and BRD animals. This suggests that nasal bacterial communities provide a potential platform for future studies and potential pen-side diagnostic testing.

4.
Vet Res ; 52(1): 126, 2021 Oct 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34600578

ABSTRACT

This work modifies a loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay to detect the bovine respiratory disease (BRD) bacterial pathogens Pasteurella multocida, Mannheimia haemolytica, and Histophilus somni in a colorimetric format on a farm. BRD causes a significant health and economic burden worldwide that partially stems from the challenges involved in determining the pathogens causing the disease. Methods such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR) have the potential to identify the causative pathogens but require lab equipment and extensive sample processing making the process lengthy and expensive. To combat this limitation, LAMP allows accurate pathogen detection in unprocessed samples by the naked eye allowing for potentially faster and more precise diagnostics on the farm. The assay developed here offers 66.7-100% analytical sensitivity, and 100% analytical specificity (using contrived samples) while providing 60-100% concordance with PCR results when tested on five steers in a feedlot. The use of a consumer-grade water bath enabled on-farm execution by collecting a nasal swab from cattle and provided a colorimetric result within 60 min. Such an assay holds the potential to provide rapid pen-side diagnostics to cattle producers and veterinarians.


Subject(s)
Cattle Diseases/diagnosis , Colorimetry/veterinary , Diagnostic Tests, Routine/veterinary , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques/veterinary , Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques/veterinary , Pasteurellaceae Infections/veterinary , Pasteurellaceae/isolation & purification , Animals , Cattle , Cattle Diseases/microbiology , Colorimetry/instrumentation , Diagnostic Tests, Routine/instrumentation , Mannheimia haemolytica/isolation & purification , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques/instrumentation , Nose/microbiology , Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques/instrumentation , Pasteurella Infections/diagnosis , Pasteurella Infections/microbiology , Pasteurella Infections/veterinary , Pasteurella multocida/isolation & purification , Pasteurellaceae Infections/diagnosis , Pasteurellaceae Infections/microbiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...