Who Watches the "Watchman" and How Often?

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common cardiac arrhythmia that is encountered during the hospitalization. Sometimes, many patients cannot be anticoagulated to prevent AF-related cardiovascular accidents because of the risk of bleeding. In these cases, we recommend putting left atrial appendage (LAA) to prevent thrombus formation in the left atrium due to AF. There is no clear time frame of how long we need to follow up with echocardiogram to monitor device-related blood clot formation and continue anticoagulation therapy if there is recurrent thrombus formation after LAA placement. We would like to present a case with AF in which the patient had epistaxis, which required to hold anticoagulation and arterial embolization. The patient agreed to the placement of the Watchman device and subsequently it was complicated by device-related thrombosis (DRT). The patient required prolonged anticoagulation treatment and follow-up echocardiogram to prevent DRT in the future.

Diagnostic Challenges of a Mass in the Left Atrium.

A 61-year-old female former smoker with history of bronchial-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma presented with increasing dyspnea, cough with white phlegm and significant weight loss. Chest X-ray showed complete opacification of the left hemithorax. A computed tomography (CT) pulmonary angiogram ruled out pulmonary embolism but revealed mass within the left atrium. A transthoracic echocardiography showed an echogenic mass in the left atrium. A cardiac MRI confirmed a bulky left lung mass suggestive of carcinoma invading the left atrium via the left pulmonary veins. CT-guided biopsy of left lung mass was suggestive of non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC, adenocarcinoma). We would like to discuss the challenges and the importance of making the correct diagnosis of intracardiac mass.

Recurrent acute coronary events in a young adult.

Acute myocardial infarction (MI) in young adults is rare. Clinicopathological conditions such as nephrotic syndrome, antiphospholipid syndrome, spontaneous coronary artery spasms or embolism can be attributed to such events. In this case report, we present a 30-year-old male who had his first MI at the age of 20 years. He received percutaneous intervention as initial treatment. Despite aggressive risk factor management, he continued to have acute coronary events and was later diagnosed with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). At the same time, he was diagnosed with severe chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension and severe tricuspid regurgitation. He underwent pulmonary endartererectomy, tricuspid annuloplasty and radial artery bypass graft to the first obtuse marginal artery. Warfarin therapy was initiated upon the diagnosis of APS. Despite being therapeutic on warfarin and aggressive risk factor management, he had yet another MI. Coronary angiogram at this time showed fresh occlusion of the right coronary artery at the mid-segment, and the patient received two overlapping stents that achieved a good effect. This case emphasizes the importance of awareness, early recognition and aggressive management of patients with APS presenting chest pain or acute coronary events. Despite appropriate treatment, such as risk factor management and percutaneous interventions, recurrence of an acute coronary event is high. The presentation of younger patients with recurrent coronary events but no significant risk factors of atherosclerosis should evoke the suspicion of APS-related coronary artery disease, and all risk factors should be aggressively managed.