Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
Farm. hosp ; 47(4): 168-174, Julio - Agosto 2023. graf, tab
Article in English, Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-223574

ABSTRACT

El asma es una enfermedad respiratoria crónica con un alto impacto sanitario, social y económico, en particular, en el caso del asma grave no controlada (AGNC). Por ello, son especialmente necesarias nuevas estrategias para mejorar su abordaje, con un enfoque personalizado a cada paciente y desde una perspectiva multidisciplinar, además de integrar las nuevas prácticas de telemedicina y telefarmacia impulsadas a raíz de la pandemia de COVID-19. En este contexto se ha desarrollado el proyecto TEAM 2.0 («Trabajo en Equipos de Asma Multidisciplinares»), continuación del proyecto TEAM llevado a cabo en 2019, con el objetivo de actualizar y priorizar buenas prácticas de trabajo multidisciplinar en AGNC en un contexto post pandemia y analizar los avances conseguidos. Un grupo coordinador, constituido por 8 equipos multidisciplinares de farmacéuticos hospitalarios, neumólogos y alergólogos, llevó a cabo una revisión bibliográfica actualizada, puesta en común de buenas prácticas multidisciplinares y análisis de avances. A través de 5 reuniones regionales con otros expertos con experiencia en AGNC, se compartieron las buenas prácticas identificadas y fueron sometidas a debate, evaluación y priorización. En total, 23 buenas prácticas de trabajo multidisciplinar en AGNC, agrupadas en 5 ámbitos de trabajo: 1) organización del trabajo en equipos multidisciplinares, 2) educación al paciente, autoadministración y adherencia, 3) resultados en salud, seguimiento de datos y persistencia, 4) telefarmacia y experiencias implantadas durante la pandemia de COVID-19 y 5) formación e investigación, fueron evaluadas y priorizadas por 57 profesionales del ámbito de la farmacia hospitalaria, la neumología, la alergología y la enfermería. Este trabajo ha permitido actualizar la hoja de ruta de acciones prioritarias, para seguir avanzando en modelos óptimos de atención al paciente con AGNC en un contexto post-COVID-19. (AU)


Asthma is a chronic respiratory disease with a high health, social and economic impact, particularly in the case of Severe Uncontrolled Asthma (SUA). For this reason, new strategies are especially necessary to improve its approach, with a personalized approach to each patient and from a multidisciplinary perspective, in addition to integrating the new telemedicine and telepharmacy practices promoted as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. In this context, the TEAM 2.0 project (“Work in Multidisciplinary Asthma Teams”) has been developed, following the TEAM project carried out in 2019, with the aim of updating and prioritizing good multidisciplinary work practices in SUA in a post pandemic context and analyze the progress made. A coordinating group, made up of eight multidisciplinary teams of hospital pharmacists, pulmonologists, and allergists, carried out an updated bibliographic review, sharing of good multidisciplinary practices, and analysis of advances. Through five regional meetings with other experts with experience in SUA, the good practices identified were shared and subjected to debate, evaluation and prioritization. In total, 23 good multidisciplinary work practices in SUA, grouped into five work areas: 1) Organization of work in multidisciplinary teams, 2) Patient education, self-management and adherence, 3) Health results, data monitoring and persistence, 4) Telepharmacy and experiences implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic and 5) Training and research, were evaluated and prioritized by 57 professionals from the field of Hospital Pharmacy, Pulmonology, Allergology and Nursing. This work has made it possible to update the roadmap of priority actions to continue advancing in optimal models of care for patients with AGNC in a post-COVID-19 context. (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Asthma , Equipment and Supplies , Pharmacy , Hospitals , Telemedicine , Pharmacy Service, Hospital
2.
Farm Hosp ; 47(4): T168-T174, 2023.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37453918

ABSTRACT

Asthma is a chronic respiratory disease with a high health, social and economic impact, particularly in the case of Severe Uncontrolled Asthma (SUA). For this reason, new strategies are especially necessary to improve its approach, with a personalized approach to each patient and from a multidisciplinary perspective, in addition to integrating the new telemedicine and telepharmacy practices promoted as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. In this context, the TEAM 2.0 project ("Work in Multidisciplinary Asthma Teams") has been developed, following the TEAM project carried out in 2019, with the aim of updating and prioritizing good multidisciplinary work practices in SUA in a post pandemic context and analyze the progress made. A coordinating group, made up of eight multidisciplinary teams of hospital pharmacists, pulmonologists, and allergists, carried out an updated bibliographic review, sharing of good multidisciplinary practices, and analysis of advances. Through five regional meetings with other experts with experience in SUA, the good practices identified were shared and subjected to debate, evaluation and prioritization. In total, 23 good multidisciplinary work practices in SUA, grouped into five work areas: 1) Organization of work in multidisciplinary teams, 2) Patient education, self-management and adherence, 3) Health results, data monitoring and persistence, 4) Telepharmacy and experiences implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic and 5) Training and research, were evaluated and prioritized by 57 professionals from the field of Hospital Pharmacy, Pulmonology, Allergology and Nursing. This work has made it possible to update the roadmap of priority actions to continue advancing in optimal models of care for patients with AGNC in a post-COVID-19 context.


Subject(s)
Asthma , COVID-19 , Humans , Pandemics , Pharmacists , Asthma/therapy , Patient Care Team
3.
Farm Hosp ; 47(4): 168-174, 2023.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37268480

ABSTRACT

Asthma is a chronic respiratory disease with a high health, social and economic impact, particularly in the case of Severe Uncontrolled Asthma (SUA). For this reason, new strategies are especially necessary to improve its approach, with a personalized approach to each patient and from a multidisciplinary perspective, in addition to integrating the new telemedicine and telepharmacy practices promoted as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. In this context, the TEAM 2.0 project ("Work in Multidisciplinary Asthma Teams") has been developed, following the TEAM project carried out in 2019, with the aim of updating and prioritizing good multidisciplinary work practices in SUA in a post pandemic context and analyze the progress made. A coordinating group, made up of eight multidisciplinary teams of hospital pharmacists, pulmonologists, and allergists, carried out an updated bibliographic review, sharing of good multidisciplinary practices, and analysis of advances. Through five regional meetings with other experts with experience in SUA, the good practices identified were shared and subjected to debate, evaluation and prioritization. In total, 23 good multidisciplinary work practices in SUA, grouped into five work areas: 1) Organization of work in multidisciplinary teams, 2) Patient education, self-management and adherence, 3) Health results, data monitoring and persistence, 4) Telepharmacy and experiences implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic and 5) Training and research, were evaluated and prioritized by 57 professionals from the field of Hospital Pharmacy, Pulmonology, Allergology and Nursing. This work has made it possible to update the roadmap of priority actions to continue advancing in optimal models of care for patients with AGNC in a post-COVID-19 context.


Subject(s)
Asthma , COVID-19 , Humans , Pandemics , Pharmacists , Asthma/therapy , Patient Care Team
4.
Respir Med ; 178: 106325, 2021 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33581510

ABSTRACT

While the incidence of thrombotic complications in critically ill patients is very high, in patients under non-invasive respiratory support (NIS) is still unknown. The specific incidence of thrombotic events in each of the clinical scenarios within the broad spectrum of severity of COVID-19, is not clearly established, and this has not allowed the implementation of thromboprophylaxis or anticoagulation for routine care in COVID-19. Patients admitted in a semi-critical unit treated initially with NIS, especially Continuous-Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP), were included in the study. The cumulative incidence of pulmonary embolism was analyzed and compared between patients with good response to NIS and patients with clinical deterioration that required orotracheal intubation. 93 patients were included and 16% required mechanical ventilation (MV) after the NIS. The crude cumulative incidence of the PE was 14% (95%, CI 8-22) for all group. In patients that required orotracheal intubation and MV, the cumulative incidence was significantly higher [33% (95%, CI 16-58)] compared to patients that continued with non-invasive support [11% (CI 5-18)] (Log-Rank, p = 0.013). Patients that required mechanical ventilation were at higher risk of PE for a HR of 4.3 (95%CI 1.2-16). In conclusion, cumulative incidence of PE is remarkably higher in critically patients with a potential impact in COVID-19 evolution. In this context, patients under NIS are a very high-risk group for developing PE without a clear strategy regarding thromboprophylaxis.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/therapy , Continuous Positive Airway Pressure , Noninvasive Ventilation , Pulmonary Embolism/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Spain
5.
Farm. hosp ; 44(5): 230-237, sept.-oct. 2020. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-195151

ABSTRACT

El asma es una de las enfermedades crónicas respiratorias de mayor prevalencia e impacto sanitario y socioeconómico, especialmente en el caso de pacientes que no alcanzan un adecuado control de la enferme-dad. Por ello, mejorar el manejo clínico de los pacientes con asma grave no controlada debe ser una prioridad sanitaria. En un contexto de redefinición general de los modelos de atención orientados al abordaje de la cronicidad y la personalización se ha desarrollado un proyecto para definir las bases del modelo de atención multidisciplinar del paciente con asma grave no controlada. El trabajo realizado refuerza la percepción de la necesidad de optimizar la coordinación entre niveles asistenciales, fomentar la colaboración y el abordaje multidisciplinar, y promover un modelo integral asistencial que permita adaptar la atención a los pacientes con asma grave no controlada de manera más personalizada. El trabajo ha permitido la identificación y priorización de buenas prácticas, por parte de equipos de trabajo multidisciplinares constituidos por médicos especialistas en alergología, neumología y farmacéuticos especialistas en farmacia hospitalaria, en base a su potencial impacto en la mejora de la calidad asistencial, resultados en salud del paciente con asma grave no controlada y la factibilidad de su implementación. Las conclusiones de este proyecto pretenden servir de ayuda a otros equipos de trabajo multidisciplinar con interés en mejo-rar la asistencia a esta patología


As one of the most prevalent chronic respiratory diseases, asthma imposes a heavy health and socioeconomic burden on society, particularly in the case of patients who fail to appropriately control the disease. For this reason, improving the clinical management of patients with severe uncontrolled asthma should be a priority for any healthcare system. At a time when healthcare models for chronic disease management and personalized medicine are undergoing a major overhaul, the project presented in this study seeks to lay the foundations for an interdisciplinary care model for patients with severe uncontrolled asthma. The work carried out reinforces the general perception that it is paramount to optimize coordination between different levels of care, encourage collaboration and an interdisciplinary approach, and promote an integrated care model that makes it possible to adapt the care of patients with severe uncontrolled asthma in a more personalized manner. Under this project, a series of interdisciplinary working groups were created, made up of specialist hospital pharmacists, pneumologists and allergists, to identify and prioritize a number of best practices, and classify them in terms of their potential impact on the improvement of the quality of care and the health outcomes of patients with severe uncontrolled asthma, and their feasibility. The authors' ambition is that the conclusions drawn from this study should help other interdisciplinary teams improve the care provided to patients suffering from severe uncontrolled asthma


Subject(s)
Humans , Interdisciplinary Placement , Interdisciplinary Communication , Pharmaceutical Services , Asthma/drug therapy , Health Programs and Plans/organization & administration , Anti-Asthmatic Agents/administration & dosage , Asthma/prevention & control , Asthma/immunology , Asthma/physiopathology , Severity of Illness Index
6.
Farm Hosp ; 44(5): 230-237, 2020 08 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32853129

ABSTRACT

As one of the most prevalent chronic respiratory diseases, asthma imposes a heavy health and socioeconomic burden on society,  particularly in the case of patients who fail to appropriately control the  disease. For this reason, improving the clinical management of patients  with severe uncontrolled asthma should be a priority for any healthcare  system.At a time when healthcare models for chronic disease management and  personalized medicine are undergoing a major overhaul, the project presented in this study seeks to lay the foundations for an  interdisciplinary care model for patients with severe uncontrolled asthma. The work carried out reinforces the general perception that it is  paramount to optimize coordination between different levels of care,  encourage collaboration and an interdisciplinary approach, and promote  an integrated care model that makes it possible to adapt the care of  patients with severe uncontrolled asthma in a more personalized manner. Under this project, a series of interdisciplinary working groups were  created, made up of specialist hospital pharmacists, pneumologists and  allergists, to identify and prioritize a number of best practices, and  classify them in terms of their potential impact on the improvement of  the quality of care and the health outcomes of patients with severe  uncontrolled asthma, and their feasibility. The authors' ambition is that  the conclusions drawn from this study should help other interdisciplinary  teams improve the care provided to patients suffering from severe  uncontrolled asthma.


El asma es una de las enfermedades crónicas respiratorias de mayor prevalencia e impacto sanitario y socioeconómico, especialmente  en el caso de pacientes que no alcanzan un adecuado control de la  enfermedad.Por ello, mejorar el manejo clínico de los pacientes con asma grave no  controlada debe ser una prioridad sanitaria. En un contexto de  redefinición general de los modelos de atención orientados al abordaje de la cronicidad y la personalización se ha desarrollado un proyecto para  definir las bases del modelo de atención multidisciplinar del paciente con  asma grave no controlada. El trabajo realizado refuerza la percepción de  la necesidad de optimizar la coordinación entre niveles asistenciales,  fomentar la colaboración y el abordaje multidisciplinar, y promover un  modelo integral asistencial que permita adaptar la atención a los  pacientes con asma grave no controlada de manera más personalizada.  El trabajo ha permitido la identificación y priorización de buenas  prácticas, por parte de equipos de trabajo multidisciplinares constituidos  por médicos especialistas en alergología, neumología y farmacéuticos  especialistas en farmacia hospitalaria, en base a su potencial impacto en  la mejora de la calidad asistencial, resultados en salud del paciente con  asma grave no controlada y la factibilidad de su implementación. Las  conclusiones de este proyecto pretenden servir de ayuda a otros equipos  de trabajo multidisciplinar con interés en mejorar la asistencia a esta  patología.


Subject(s)
Asthma , Asthma/therapy , Delivery of Health Care , Humans , Pharmacists , Precision Medicine , Surveys and Questionnaires
7.
Ann Thorac Surg ; 79(6): 1872-8, 2005 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15919275

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to describe and to assess the effectiveness of conservative treatment as the chosen treatment for managing iatrogenic tracheobronchial injuries (ITBI). METHODS: Between January 1993 and December 2003, 33 tracheobronchial injuries were treated in our hospital. Eighteen (54.5%) were ITBI and 15 (45.5%) were traumatic noniatrogenic injuries. Of the ITBI patients, sex distribution was 15 (83%) females and 3 (17%) males with a mean age of 57.7 +/- 20.7 years (range, 17 to 88 years). Fifteen (83.3%) of the injuries were caused by orotracheal intubation and 3 (15.7%) by tracheotomy. The average diagnostic delay was 25.7 +/- 22.9 hours. The mean injury size was 2.83 +/- 1.02 cm (range, 1 to 4 cm). Nine (50%) injuries were located in the cervical trachea, 6 (33.3%) in the thoracic trachea, and 3 (16%) involved both trachea and main bronchi. Conservative treatment was chosen for 17 (94.4%) of the 18 cases. We performed surgical repair in only 1 case owing to progressive subcutaneous emphysema and increasing difficulty with mechanical ventilation. RESULTS: No complications arose from the use of conservative treatment. Four patients (22%) died in our hospital, 3 of these of non-ITBI-related causes. Mortality was not related to four variables: sex, diagnostic delay, location, or size of the ITBI. Fourteen of the 18 patients (77.7%) were discharged uneventfully, and the endoscopic and clinical follow-up examinations were satisfactory in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: Conservative treatment for ITBI is effective regardless of production, size, or site of the injuries. Surgical treatment is advisable in specific cases: rapid progression of subcutaneous and mediastinal emphysema, mediastinitis, and difficulty with mechanical ventilation.


Subject(s)
Intubation/adverse effects , Lung Injury , Trachea/injuries , Wounds and Injuries/therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Iatrogenic Disease , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...