Predicting Neoadjuvant Treatment Response in Rectal Cancer Using Machine Learning: Evaluation of MRI-Based Radiomic and Clinical Models.

BACKGROUND: Radiomics is an approach to medical imaging that quantifies the features normally translated into visual display. While both radiomic and clinical markers have shown promise in predicting response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (nCRT) for rectal cancer, the interrelationship is not yet clear. METHODS: A retrospective, single-institution study of patients treated with nCRT for locally advanced rectal cancer was performed. Clinical and radiomic features were extracted from electronic medical record and pre-treatment magnetic resonance imaging, respectively. Machine learning models were created and assessed for complete response and positive treatment effect using the area under the receiver operating curves. RESULTS: Of 131 rectal cancer patients evaluated, 68 (51.9%) were identified to have a positive treatment effect and 35 (26.7%) had a complete response. On univariate analysis, clinical T-stage (OR 0.46, p = 0.02), lymphovascular/perineural invasion (OR 0.11, p = 0.03), and statin use (OR 2.45, p = 0.049) were associated with a complete response. Clinical T-stage (OR 0.37, p = 0.01), lymphovascular/perineural invasion (OR 0.16, p = 0.001), and abnormal carcinoembryonic antigen level (OR 0.28, p = 0.002) were significantly associated with a positive treatment effect. The clinical model was the strongest individual predictor of both positive treatment effect (AUC = 0.64) and complete response (AUC = 0.69). The predictive ability of a positive treatment effect increased by adding tumor and mesorectal radiomic features to the clinical model (AUC = 0.73). CONCLUSIONS: The use of a combined model with both clinical and radiomic features resulted in the strongest predictive capability. With the eventual goal of tailoring treatment to the individual, both clinical and radiologic markers offer insight into identifying patients likely to respond favorably to nCRT.

Image Quality Evaluation in Dual-Energy CT of the Chest, Abdomen, and Pelvis in Obese Patients With Deep Learning Image Reconstruction.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate image quality in vascular and oncologic dual-energy computed tomography (CT) imaging studies performed with a deep learning (DL)-based image reconstruction algorithm in patients with body mass index of ≥30. METHODS: Vascular and multiphase oncologic staging dual-energy CT examinations were evaluated. Two image reconstruction algorithms were applied to the dual-energy CT data sets: standard of care Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction (ASiR-V) and TrueFidelity DL image reconstruction at 2 levels (medium and high). Subjective quality criteria were independently evaluated by 4 abdominal radiologists, and interreader agreement was assessed. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio were compared between image reconstruction methods. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients were included in this study, and the mean patient body mass index was 39.5 (SD, 7.36). TrueFidelity-High (DL-High) and TrueFidelity-Medium (DL-Med) image reconstructions showed statistically significant higher Likert scores compared with ASiR-V across all subjective image quality criteria ( P < 0.001 for DL-High vs ASiR-V; P < 0.05 for DL-Med vs ASiR-V), and SNRs for aorta and liver were significantly higher for DL-High versus ASiR-V ( P < 0.001). Contrast-to-noise ratio for aorta and SNR for aorta and liver were significantly higher for DL-Med versus ASiR-V ( P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: TrueFidelity DL image reconstruction provides improved image quality compared with ASiR-V in dual-energy CTs obtained in obese patients.

Analysis and Evaluation of a Deep Learning Reconstruction Approach with Denoising for Orthopedic MRI.

PURPOSE: To evaluate two settings (noise reduction of 50% or 75%) of a deep learning (DL) reconstruction model relative to each other and to conventional MR image reconstructions on clinical orthopedic MRI datasets. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 54 patients who underwent two-dimensional fast spin-echo MRI for hip (n = 22; mean age, 44 years ± 13 [standard deviation]; nine men) or shoulder (n = 32; mean age, 56 years ± 17; 17 men) conditions between March 2019 and June 2020. MR images were reconstructed with conventional methods and the vendor-provided and commercially available DL model applied with 50% and 75% noise reduction settings (DL 50 and DL 75, respectively). Quantitative analytics, including relative anatomic edge sharpness, relative signal-to-noise ratio (rSNR), and relative contrast-to-noise ratio (rCNR) were computed for each dataset. In addition, the image sets were randomized, blinded, and presented to three board-certified musculoskeletal radiologists for ranking based on overall image quality and diagnostic confidence. Statistical analysis was performed with a nonparametric hypothesis comparing derived quantitative metrics from each reconstruction approach. In addition, inter- and intrarater agreement analysis was performed on the radiologists' rankings. RESULTS: Both denoising settings of the DL reconstruction showed improved edge sharpness, rSNR, and rCNR relative to the conventional reconstructions. The reader rankings demonstrated strong agreement, with both DL reconstructions outperforming the conventional approach (Gwet agreement coefficient = 0.98). However, there was lower agreement between the readers on which DL reconstruction denoising setting produced higher-quality images (Gwet agreement coefficient = 0.31 for DL 50 and 0.35 for DL 75). CONCLUSION: The vendor-provided DL MRI reconstruction showed higher edge sharpness, rSNR, and rCNR in comparison with conventional methods; however, optimal levels of denoising may need to be further assessed.Keywords: MRI Reconstruction Method, Deep Learning, Image Analysis, Signal-to-Noise Ratio, MR-Imaging, Neural Networks, Hip, Shoulder, Physics, Observer Performance, Technology Assessment Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2021.