ABSTRACT
Importance: Accurate preoperative localization is critical to success in targeted parathyroidectomy for primary hyperparathyroidism. Objective: To determine if the association between the long axis of a parathyroid adenoma (PTA) candidate and strap musculature on sagittal ultrasonography (US) can be used to predict the embryologic origin of the gland. Design, Setting, and Participants: This diagnostic study was performed using the Stanford Research Repository. Patients 18 years or older with primary hyperparathyroidism who underwent parathyroidectomy between January 2009 and October 2021 were considered. Additional inclusion criteria were having clear sagittal view of the adenoma candidate on US, confirmation of the gland of origin intraoperatively, and confirmation of hypercellular parathyroid on final pathology. Data were analyzed from October 2021 to June 2022. Exposures: B-mode US and surgical parathyroidectomy. Main Outcomes and Measures: The index test was using US to measure the angle between the long axis of an adenoma candidate and the strap musculature in the sagittal plane. This angle was used to test whether inferior and superior PTAs could be accurately assigned. The hypothesis was formulated prior to data collection. Results: A total of 426 patients (mean [range] age, 61.1 [20-96] years; 316 [74.2%] female) with 442 adenomas met inclusion criteria. Of the 442 adenomas, 314 (71.0%) had measurable angles, of which 204 (46.2%) were assigned a superior origin, 238 (53.8%) were assigned an inferior origin, and 128 (29%) were indeterminate. Of the surgically identified superior PTAs, 144 (70.6%) had a definable angle, and of the surgically identified inferior PTAs, 170 (71.4%) had a definable angle. The receiver operating characteristic analysis found 94° as the optimized angle for differentiating true negatives from true positives, with an overall sensitivity of 74% and specificity of 72%. This supported using 90° as a break point for US review. True positives were considered superior adenomas with an angle greater than 90°; true negatives were inferior adenomas with an angle less than 90°. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of angulation analysis for determining PTA origin were 72.2% (95% CI, 64.9%-79.5%), 73.5% (95% CI, 66.9%-80.1%), 69.8% (95% CI, 62.5%-77.1%), 75.8% (95% CI, 69.3%-82.3%), and 72.9%, respectively. A subgroup analysis of 426 adenomas using the posterior carotid artery border on transverse US as a surrogate for predicting gland origin showed the following for sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy: 49.5% (95% CI, 42.6%-56.4%), 82.3% (95% CI, 77.3%-87.3%), 71.4% (95% CI, 63.9%-78.9%), 64.6% (95% CI, 59.1%-70.1%), and 66.9%, respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: This diagnostic study showed that PTA angulation on sagittal plane US can be used to predict gland of origin and guide surgery. The relationship between adenoma and posterior carotid artery border on transverse US can also be used to predict gland origin. These easy-to-apply US-based tests can be used in conjunction with other imaging modalities to guide targeted parathyroidectomy.
ABSTRACT
Importance: Nodule rupture is a rare but serious complication of thyroid radiofrequency ablation (RFA). With growing adoption of thyroid RFA across the US, an understanding of thyroid nodule rupture (TNR) is crucial for recognition, management, and, ultimately, prevention. Objective: To determine procedural and patient factors that may contribute to TNR and describe experiences in managing TNR while synthesizing existing literature. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective case series examined all RFA procedures for benign thyroid nodules performed by 2 attending physicians at a single academic referral center between December 2019 and January 2024. A total of 298 consecutive patients underwent RFA for benign thyroid nodules. Criteria for offering RFA included nodules with 2 benign fine-needle aspirations, no suspicious ultrasonography features, a greatest dimension of 2 cm or greater, compressive or cosmetic concerns, and accessibility to a straight needle. Exposures: All RFAs were performed using ultrasonography guidance using the moving-shot technique and a 7-mm or 10-mm active tip. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was TNR, and measures were procedure, nodule, and patient characteristics that may have contributed to its pathogenesis. Secondary outcomes were nodule volume reduction, thyroid function, and management and sequelae of TNR. The hypothesis on the pathogenesis of TNR was formed before data collection. Results: Six of 298 patients (2%; 4 women [67%]) with a mean age of 48.5 years (range, 34-65 years) experienced TNR for a mean of 36 days postprocedure (range, 19-54 days). The mean (SD) initial nodule volume among patients with TNR was 31.45 (16.52) mL, and 3 of 6 patients (50%) underwent prior lobectomy. All ruptures were anterior. All patients were treated conservatively, and none required surgery. Five patients recovered completely; the sixth and most recent patient was healing as of last follow-up. Conclusions and Relevance: There are limited data on the etiology and optimal management of TNR. These 6 cases of anterior rupture suggest that a potential contributor to TNR is thermal and mechanical trauma exerted at the fulcrum point during the moving-shot technique. The use of a smaller active tip (eg, 7 mm) and cessation of energy delivery before this point may help avoid TNR. More robust reporting of this complication may clarify risk factors for and enhance prevention of TNR.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Thyroid and parathyroid operations are among the most commonly performed surgeries in the world; however, there remains a paucity of prospective clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of opioid-sparing protocols after surgery. STUDY DESIGN: This prospective nonrandomized study was performed between March and October 2021. Participants self-selected their cohort of either an opioid-sparing protocol of acetaminophen/ibuprofen or a treatment-as-usual protocol with opioids. Primary endpoints were Overall Benefit of Analgesia Scores (OBAS) and opioid use as reported in daily medication logs. Data were recorded for 7 days. Multivariable regression, pooled variance t -tests, Mann-Whitney test, and chi-square tests were used to evaluate the results. RESULTS: A total of 87 participants were recruited; 48 participants opted for the opioid-sparing arm, and 39 participants opted for the treatment-as-usual arm. Patients in the opioid-sparing arm used significantly fewer opioids (morphine equivalents 0.77 ± 1.71 vs 3.34 ± 5.87, p = 0.042) but had no significant difference in OBAS (p = 0.37). Multivariable regression analysis demonstrated no significant difference in mean OBAS between treatment arms when controlling for age, sex, and type of surgery (p = 0.88). There were no major adverse events in either group. CONCLUSIONS: An opioid-sparing treatment algorithm based on the use of acetaminophen/ibuprofen may offer a safe and effective treatment algorithm compared to a primary opioid-focused treatment pathway. Randomized adequately powered studies are needed to confirm these findings.
