Lung mechanics and pulmonary function testing in cetaceans.

We measured esophageal pressures, respiratory flow rates, and expired O2 and CO2 in six adult bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) during voluntary breaths and maximal (chuff) respiratory efforts. The data were used to estimate the dynamic specific lung compliance (sCL), the O2 consumption rate (V̇O2 ) and CO2 production rates (V̇CO2 ) during rest. Our results indicate that bottlenose dolphins have the capacity to generate respiratory flow rates that exceed 130 l s(-1) and 30 l s(-1) during expiration and inspiration, respectively. The esophageal pressures indicated that expiration is passive during voluntary breaths, but active during maximal efforts, whereas inspiration is active for all breaths. The average sCL of dolphins was 0.31±0.04 cmH2O(-1), which is considerably higher than that of humans (0.08 cmH2O(-1)) and that previously measured in a pilot whale (0.13 cmH2O(-1)). The average estimated V̇O2  and V̇CO2  using our breath-by-breath respirometry system ranged from 0.857 to 1.185 l O2 min(-1) and 0.589 to 0.851 l CO2 min(-1), respectively, which is similar to previously published metabolic measurements from the same animals using conventional flow-through respirometry. In addition, our custom-made system allows us to approximate end tidal gas composition. Our measurements provide novel data for respiratory physiology in cetaceans, which may be important for clinical medicine and conservation efforts.

How to be an active appraiser.

Being an active appraiser is very challenging in terms of knowing a doctor's work well enough to appraise them effectively. It also requires a set of skills that need to be developed and applied well in a complex system and in the context of an individual doctor's career development. Being 'active' means bringing these skills and principles together.

Acute effects of suction retraction on atrial hemodynamics and histology.

OBJECTIVES: In minimally invasive and robotic mitral valve surgery, a blade retractor is used to elevate the left atrial roof, which often distorts tissue and impairs visualization. We tested the hemodynamic and histologic changes of intra-atrial suction, using a new suction retractor that may improve stabilization and visualization. METHODS: Swine were divided into 3 equal (n = 4) groups: blade retractor, suction retractor, and arrested heart control. Left atrial ultrasonic crystals were used to record ejection fractions. After cardioplegic arrest, the atrium was opened and sampled for preretractor histology. Retractors remained in place for 1 hour, followed by postretractor histologic sampling. Controls were crossclamped for an equivalent time and postarrest histologic data obtained. Animals were weaned from bypass, data were collected for 4 hours, and postsacrifice atrial histologic samples were obtained. RESULTS: The main effect due to treatment was not statistically significant ( P = .52) between the 3 groups, with the 4-hour average ejection fraction for blade retractor, suction retractor, and control being statistically equivalent at 33.3% +/- 8.3, 35.3% +/- 12.1, and 40.8% +/- 9.9 (mean +/- standard deviation), respectively. Histology showed equivalent amounts of myocyte fragmentation, interstitial edema, eosinophilia, and wavy fibers between blade retraction and suction retraction, while the latter showed slightly increased amounts of hemorrhage. CONCLUSIONS: Atrial endocardial suction retraction appears to be safe with no acute changes in the left atrial ejection fraction or significant acute histologic differences, compared to blade retraction. Furthermore, intra-atrial suction may be applicable to procedures other than minimally invasive and robotic mitral valve repair for providing improved stabilization.

Robotic skeletonizing of the internal thoracic artery: is it safe?

BACKGROUND: The advantages of internal thoracic artery skeletonization include early high blood flow, a longer conduit, and less bleeding than pedicle internal thoracic artery grafts. Longer conduits are needed for complete endoscopic arterial revascularization. Therefore this study was designed to determine the feasibility and safety of internal thoracic artery skeletonization using the da Vinci robotic system (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA). METHODS: Nine dogs underwent bilateral robotic internal thoracic artery harvesting through three ports placed in the left chest. One internal thoracic artery was harvested as a pedicle in each dog, and the other was skeletonized. Internal thoracic artery blood flow was measured in each graft, and comparative endothelial histologic studies were performed. Data are mean +/- the standard error of the mean. RESULTS: All 18 internal thoracic arteries were harvested successfully. Skeletonized internal thoracic artery harvests required more time (48.0 minutes +/- 1.8) than pedicle internal thoracic artery harvests (39.0 minutes +/- 1.4; p < 0.05). Internal thoracic artery flows during the final intervals were similar (skeletonized = 30.0 mL/min +/- 2.4 vs pedicle = 31.5 mL/min +/- 1.8; p = 0.9). Free internal thoracic artery bleeding flow was similar in both groups (skeletonized = 162.0 mL/min +/- 3.0 vs pedicle = 189.0 mL/min +/- 2.4; p = 0.4). Histologically, both groups were similar with minimal endothelial damage. CONCLUSIONS: Robotically skeletonized harvesting is safe, but it requires more time (48.0 minutes +/- 1.8) than pedicle internal thoracic artery harvesting. Despite muted tactile feedback with robotics, neither technique was associated with histologic or functional damage. These encouraging results may represent an advantage for complete arterial revascularization in robotic coronary bypass patients.