Relationship of Subtalar Joint Range of Motion to Ankle Injuries in NBA G League and Collegiate Basketball Players.

BACKGROUND: This study sought to determine whether range of motion (ROM) of the ankle and subtalar joint complex (STJ) is correlated with ankle injuries in National Basketball Association (NBA) G-league and collegiate basketball players to identify an at-risk population that may benefit from participation in an ankle injury prevention program. METHODS: This prospective cohort study encompassed 103 player-seasons (68 collegiate, 35 NBA G-League). Patient demographics, passive ankle and STJ range of motion measurements, anterior drawer, and talar tilt tests were collected at preseason physicals along with plain radiographs. Subtalar eversion and inversion measurements were added to assess the Combination Motion (CM) of the STJ and subtracted to calculate the Subtalar Difference (SD). We defined the ratio of CM to SD as Subtalar Mobility Index (SMI=CM/SD). RESULTS: Twenty-one ankle injuries occurred with 10 405 player exposures yielding an incidence of 2.11/1000 exposures, resulting in 113 days of missed playing time. No direct measures of ankle, subtalar, or combined motion were associated with risk of injury, rejecting our original hypothesis that increased STJ ROM would predispose to ankle injuries. However, we did find that athletes with CM >16 degrees in combination with either SD <6 degrees (P = .025) or SMI >3.75 (P = .032) were nearly 3 times more likely to have an ankle injury (3.14 vs 2.97, respectively). CONCLUSION: Using the predictive subtalar mobility thresholds found in this study may help identify at-risk players that may benefit from targeted ankle injury prevention programs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prospective cohort study.

N-Acetylaspartate Biomarker of Stroke Recovery: A Case Series Study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Strong experimental neurobehavioral evidence suggests that intensive training improves arm motor disability after stroke. Yet, we still have only limited understanding why some patients recover more completely and others do not. This is in part due to our limited knowledge of the neurobiological principles of recovery from stroke. Mounting evidence suggests that functional and structural remapping of the primary motor cortex (M1) plays a major role in arm recovery after stroke. We used MR Spectroscopy to test the hypothesis that therapy-related arm improvement is associated with changes in levels of a putative marker of neuronal integrity (N-acetylaspartate, NAA) in M1 controlling the paretic arm (ipsilesional M1) in chronic stroke patients (n=5). METHODS: Patients (1 female, age, mean ± SD, 58.4 ± 5.8 years) underwent 4-week arm-focused motor training (1080 repetitions of a reach-to-grasp task) at 13.6 ± 5.3 months after stroke onset. NAA levels in the ipsilesional M1 and arm impairment (Fugl-Meyer, FM, 66=normal; proximal FM, FMp, 30=normal) were assessed prior to and immediately after training. RESULTS: At baseline, patients exhibited moderate-to-mild arm impairment (FM, 47.2 ± 18.8, FMp, 22.2 ± 8.6) and showed lower levels of NAA compared with age/sex-matched healthy controls (10.2 ± 0.9 mM in patients vs. 11.6 ± 1.6 mM in controls, p=0.03). After training, arm impairment improved (FM by 7%, 50.6 ± 17.5, p=0.01; FMp, by 5%, 23.4 ± 8.2, p=0.2) and NAA levels increased by 10.5% (11.2 ± 1.2 mM, p=0.1). Changes in NAA positively correlated with changes in FM (r=0.63, p=0.2) and FMp (r=0.93, p=0.03), suggesting that patients who show greater neuronal changes have a better chance of recovery. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest the potential use of M1 NAA as a biomarker of motor recovery after stroke. However, because of our small sample, these preliminary results should be interpreted cautiously. Further work with larger sample sizes is warranted.

Does QUICK TAPE Offer Comparable Support and Off-loading as Low-Dye Taping?

BACKGROUND: Low-Dye taping is commonly used to manage foot pathologies and pain. Precut one-piece QUICK TAPE was designed to facilitate taping. However, no study to date has demonstrated that QUICK TAPE offers similar support and off-loading as traditional taping. METHODS: This pilot study compared the performance of QUICK TAPE and low-Dye taping in 20 healthy participants (40 feet) with moderate-to-severe pes planus. Study participants completed arch height index (AHI), dynamic plantar assessment with a plantar pressure measurement system, and subjective rating in three conditions: barefoot, low-Dye, and QUICK TAPE. The order of test conditions was randomized for each participant, and the taping was applied to both feet based on a standard method. A generalized estimating equation with an identity link function was used to examine differences across test conditions while accounting for potential dependence in bilateral data. RESULTS: Participants stood with a significantly greater AHI (P = .007) when either taping was applied compared with barefoot. Participants also demonstrated significantly different plantar loading when walking with both tapings versus barefoot. Both tapings yielded reduced force-time integral (FTI) in the medial and lateral forefoot and increased FTI under toes. Unlike previous studies, however, no lateralization of plantar pressure was observed with either taping. Participants ranked both tapings more supportive than barefoot. Most participants (77.8%) ranked low-Dye least comfortable, and 55.6% preferred QUICK TAPE over low-Dye. CONCLUSIONS: Additional studies are needed to examine the clinical utility of QUICK TAPE in individuals with foot pathologies such as heel pain syndrome and metatarsalgia.