Radiographic and plantar pressure assessment of pes planovalgus severity in children with cerebral palsy.

BACKGROUND: Pes planovalgus is common in children with cerebral palsy. Although severity influences treatment, there still lacks standard clinical measurements to objectively quantify pes planovalgus in this population. The comparison of pedobarographic data and radiographic measurements to clinical evaluation has not been reported in this population. METHODS: 395  feet were identified from a population of ambulatory pediatric patients with cerebral palsy. Each patient initially underwent clinical evaluation by an experienced physical therapist who classified feet as: 136 controls, 116 mild, 100 moderate, and 43 severe pes planovalgus. Quantitative measurements were then calculated from antero-posterior and lateral radiographs of the foot. Pedobarographic analysis included the arch index, center of pressure index, and a newly defined medial index. FINDINGS: A multivariate analysis was performed on the radiographic and pedobarographic measurements collected. It identified seven variables that improved objective classification of pes planovalgus severity when utilized together. These include the foot progression angle, initial contact force, arch index, medial index, antero-posterior talonavicular coverage, lateral calcaneal pitch and lateral Meary's angle. While the lateral calcaneal pitch angle statistically differed amongst all severity classes, no pedobarographic value statistically differed between all severity classes. INTERPRETATION: Overall, the combination of radiographic and pedobarographic measurements provides valuable information for objectively classifying severity of pes planovalgus in children with cerebral palsy by utilizing these values together rather than independently. In a clinical setting, radiographs and pedobarographic data may be obtained to enhance assessment of severity and guide treatment.

Appropriateness of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease in US Department of Veterans Affairs Hospitals From 2013 to 2015.

Importance: In hospitals outside of the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) system, 1 in 10 percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) for stable coronary artery disease is considered rarely appropriate by the appropriate use criteria, with variation across hospitals. The appropriateness of PCIs in VA hospitals has not been documented. Objective: To characterize the appropriateness of PCIs in VA hospitals. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study included patients with stable coronary artery disease undergoing elective PCI from November 1, 2013, to October 31, 2015, within the VA Clinical Assessment, Reporting, and Tracking Program, an operational program that includes 59 VA hospitals. Data were analyzed from March 1, 2019, to August 8, 2019. Exposures: Elective PCI at a VA hospital. Main Outcomes and Measures: Proportion of PCIs classified as appropriate, may be appropriate, or rarely appropriate; extent of hospital-level variation in rarely appropriate PCIs using criteria issued by cardiovascular professional societies in 2012. The extent of hospital-level variation in rates of rarely appropriate PCI was characterized using hospital proportions and random-effect logistic regression. Results: Among 2611 patients undergoing elective PCI (mean [SD] age, 66.3 [7.6] years; 2577 [98.7%] men) at 59 hospitals, a total of 778 PCIs (29.8%) were classified as appropriate, 1561 PCIs (59.8%) were classified as may be appropriate, and 272 PCIs (10.4%) were classified as rarely appropriate. Rarely appropriate PCIs were more commonly performed in patients who had low-risk stress test findings (220 patients [89.1%]), who were taking no (100 patients [36.8%]) or 1 (167 patients [61.4%]) antianginal medication, or who had 1 coronary artery stenosis (185 patients [68.0%]). The unadjusted hospital-level rates of rarely appropriate PCIs ranged from 0% to 28.6%, with a median (interquartile range) of 9.7% (6.3%-13.9%). Random-effect models yielded an estimated median (interquartile range) rate of rarely appropriate PCI of 10.4% (8.7%-12.3%). Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that in VA practice, most PCIs for stable coronary artery disease were classified as appropriate or may be appropriate. However, 1 in 10 PCIs was classified as rarely appropriate, with variation across VA hospitals. Efforts to improve patient selection are needed.

Normal Percentile Reference Curves and Correlation of Acetabular Index and Acetabular Depth Ratio in Children.

BACKGROUND: Radiographic surveillance of the hip is vital in the diagnosis and treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) in children. The acetabular index (AI) and the acetabular depth ratio (ADR) are radiographic parameters for evaluation of acetabular morphology. Normal reference curves for these parameters that allow for serial evaluation of acetabular development in a manner that is independent of age are necessary and clinically useful. The purpose of this study was (1) to establish normal values of AI and ADR in the normally developing pediatric hip up to age 14, (2) to generate percentile reference curves of both parameters, (3) to determine the extent of correlation between AI and ADR, and (4) to assess intrarater and interrater reliability of AI measurement. METHODS: We identified 1734 patients who underwent anterior-posterior pelvic radiography between 2004 and 2014. A total of 1152 patients (age range, 0.15 to 13.97 y; 2304 hips) were identified as radiographically normal in the radiology report, signed by the attending pediatric radiologist on the basis of the absence of structural deformity of the hip and previously established reference values for DDH assessment. A review of the medical records confirmed that patients had no diagnosis of DDH or any other orthopaedic hip pathology. The AI and ADR were measured in all radiographs. Normal values and fully parametric percentile curves were generated from birth to skeletal maturity. Correlation between AI and ADR was assessed using linear regression analysis. RESULTS: Normal AI decreased, and ADR increased, with age. Percentile curves were generated for AI and ADR. Using the provided equations, measured values can be converted to age-appropriate percentile and Z-score. The 2 parameters exhibited strong correlation (Pearson correlation=-0.789, P<0.001). For every unit increase in ADR, AI decreased by 0.94 degrees. CONCLUSIONS: We present updated normative values of AI that expand up to age 14, and novel reference values for ADR. The reference curves allow for the easy conversion of measured values to percentile and Z-score. Using the presented method during surveillance of the pathologic hip, change in acetabular development can now be assessed in a manner that is independent of age and the natural development of the acetabulum. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV-case series.