Results of isolated ulnar shaft shortening osteotomy in the treatment of idiopathic ulnocarpal impaction syndrome.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the results of isolated ulnar shaft shortening osteotomy (USSO) in the treatment of idiopathic ulnocarpal impingement syndrome. This was a two-center retrospective study. All patients older than 18 years who underwent isolated USSO for idiopathic ulnocarpal impingement syndrome between 2006 and 2016 were included. The outcome measures were: patient satisfaction, decrease in pain intensity, change in occupation, QuickDASH and PRWE functional scores, secondary palliative surgery suggesting failure of the ulnar shaft shortening osteotomy, and postoperative ulnar variance. The main complications were analyzed. Thirty-one patients were included. Twenty-six (84%) were satisfied with the procedure. At an average follow-up of 62 months, there was no secondary palliative surgery. Mean pain intensity on VAS was 7/10 (range, 2-10) and 1.7/10 (range, 0-6) preoperatively and postoperatively, respectively, for a mean decrease of 5.3 ± 2.6 points; this decrease was statistically significant (p < 0.001). None of the manual workers had to alter their work. Mean postoperative QuickDASH score was 19.6/100 (range, 0-79.55) and mean postoperative PRWE score was 23/100 (range, 1-85). Mean postoperative ulnar variance was -0.5 mm. As for complications, 61% of patients (n = 19/31) had discomfort related to the plate; 9.7% (n = 3/31) had distal radioulnar osteoarthritis; 4% (n = 1/19) had a fracture after hardware removal; 13% (n = 4/31) had non-union. Despite a high rate of complications, the study confirmed the effectiveness, in terms of pain, of isolated USSO in the treatment of idiopathic ulnocarpal impingement syndrome. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV; retrospective cohort.

Ulna shortening osteotomy versus arthroscopic wafer procedure in the treatment of ulnocarpal impingement syndrome.

Post-traumatic or constitutional ulnar impaction syndrome can be treated by shortening the ulna. This can be achieved by diaphyseal or metaphyseal osteotomy, or by arthroscopic epiphyseal resection. The objective of this study was to compare the results of the diaphyseal shortening osteotomy (USO) and arthroscopic wafer procedure (AWP) of the ulna in this indication. This was a retrospective case series of 33 patients operated for ulnar impaction syndrome by the same surgeon between 1997 and 2017. The diagnosis was made based on pain on the ulnar edge of the wrist with positive provocative tests. Radiographs were made and CT arthrography or MRI were used to confirm the diagnosis. Per-and post-operative assessments were functional (DASH and PRWE scores), clinical (pain, range of motion and grip strength) and radiographic. Diaphyseal ulnar shortening osteotomy (USO) was performed in 9 patients using a volar plate and a cutting guide. Twenty-four patients underwent an arthroscopic wafer procedure. Mean follow-up was 103 ± 8 months in the USO group versus 55 ± 4 months in the AWP group. There was no significant difference between groups in pain levels (1.2/10 in the USO group versus 0.9/10 in the AWP group, p = 0.88), grip strength (39 Kg in the USO group versus 34 Kg in the AWP group, p = 0.27) and PRWE score (5,8/100 in the USO group versus 11,2 in the AWP group, p = 0.34), and DASH score (25/100 in the USO group versus 28 in the AWP group, p = 0.63). The time away from work was long in the USO group than in the AWP group (7.86 months versus 3.75 months) (p = 0.002). Seven patients were reoperated in the USO group (5 plate removal, 1 nonunion and 1 delayed union) versus 3 in the AWP group (1 ECU stabilization, 1 ablation for painful ulnar styloid due to nonunion and 1 wrist denervation) (p = 0.0004). The study found no clinical differences between these two techniques except the return to work time. In our series, diaphyseal USO was associated with a greater number of reoperations than the AWP.

Arthroscopic-assisted 6U approach for foveal reattachment of triangular fibrocartilage complex with an anchor: Clinical and radiographic outcomes at 4 years' mean follow-up.

The main objective of this study was to evaluate the long-term clinical and radiological outcomes of arthroscopic-assisted foveal repair of proximal triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) tears with an anchor. The secondary objective was to look for ligament damage associated with TFCC tears. Twenty-four patients who underwent foveal repair of the TFCC were evaluated retrospectively: 16 stage 2 and 8 stage 3 in the Atzei-EWAS classification. The TFCC was repaired with an anchor using an expanded 6U approach. Systematic testing of intrinsic and extrinsic ligaments was performed. The assessment criteria were pain on a visual analog scale (VAS), wrist joint range of motion, grip strength and pronation-supination strength, and the QuickDASH and PRWE outcome scores. X-rays were also taken to assess anchor position and to look for distal radioulnar (DRU) joint damage. The average follow-up was 44 months. After the surgical repair, pain was reduced (7.36±1.3 preoperatively vs. 0.69±1.3 postoperatively; P<0.001), the QuickDASH score improved (52.1±16 vs. 21.7±7; P<0.001), the PRWE score improved (83.7±35 vs. 9.3±12; P<0.001) as did strength (35 vs. 43kg; P<0.001). The DRU joint stability was also significantly improved. The time away from work was 2.6 months. During the arthroscopy exploration, 25% of patients had an ulnotriquetral ligament lesion and 8% had an ulnolunar ligament lesion in combination with their TFCC tear. Fifteen anchors were positioned in the anatomical fovea (62%). No DRU joint damage was noted. Six patients had neurapraxia of the dorsal branch of the ulnar nerve, although it recovered spontaneously. One patient still had hypoesthesia of the ulnar side of the fifth finger at 48 months. Arthroscopic-assisted foveal repair of the TFCC yields good results in terms of pain, strength and DRU joint stability. In one-quarter of cases, TFCC foveal tears are associated with lesions of the ulnotriquetral ligament. There is no long-term degeneration of the DRU joint.

Distal interphalangeal joint arthrodesis with the intramedullary Lync® implant: Prospective study of 22 cases.

Several techniques have been described for fusion of the distal interphalangeal joint. The intramedullary Lync® implant (Novastep™) may be superior to other options as it is available in straight or bent configurations, does not need to be removed and does not require fingertip incisions. The objective of our prospective study was to determine the effectiveness of finger distal interphalangeal (DIP) arthrodesis with Lync® implants. Between February 2016 and June 2017, we performed 22 cases of DIP arthrodesis with this implant. Pain was assessed with a visual analog scale, the joint range of motion was measured using a digital goniometer, the pulp to palm distance was measured using a ruler, and the QuickDASH Questionnaire was filled out. AP and lateral X-rays were used to look for secondary displacement at 3 weeks and joint fusion at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months. The primary endpoint was clinical and radiological union defined as the presence of trabecular bone bridges across the arthrodesis site. The patients' mean age was 57.8 years ± 9.9 (36-73). The mean follow up was 10 months ± 4.9 (3-15). The pre-operative pain level was 6/10 ± 2.4 (0-10) and it was 1.3/10 ± 1.7 (0-6) at 3 months post-operative (P < 0.0001). The mean pre-operative DASH Score was 64/100 ± 16 (15.9-86.3) and it was 19/100 ± 14 (2.3-45.4) at 3 months post-operative (P < 0.0001). At the end of the study, 20 DIP joints were fused (91%); 18 joints had fused at the 3 month follow-up visit (82%). Three cases required reoperation. DIP arthrodesis with the Lync® implant resulted in DIP fusion in 91% of cases. When fusion was achieved, it provided pain relief and improved function. The Lync® implant is less bulky than other arthrodesis devices and does not need to be removed.