Positive changes in the medical educational environment following introduction of a new systems-based curriculum: DREEM or reality? Curricular change and the Environment.

BACKGROUND: Evaluation of a new systems-based curriculum in an undergraduate Irish Medical School was carried out with the validated Dundee Ready Educational Environment (DREEM) inventory. Comparison was made with the results from a previous DREEM study in the old curriculum. METHODS: DREEM was administered to 225 medical students enrolled in the new curriculum. Data analysis was carried out using SPSS 17.0 and the Student unpaired t test. RESULTS: Increased mean scores supported greater satisfaction with the educational environment in the new curriculum. Students perceived better opportunities to develop interpersonal skills, ask questions and learn about empathy. Areas of concern included timetabling, support for stressed students and provision of feedback. Clinical students perceived their overall environment more positively. Pre-clinical students were more confident about passing exams and felt better prepared for clinical practice. Male students were more positive about the environment and found the teaching more stimulating. Female students perceived greater development of their problem-solving skills. Non-Irish students no longer perceived the atmosphere and their social self-perceptions more negative than Irish students, as was the case in the old curriculum. CONCLUSIONS: DREEM is a valuable tool in evaluating the educational environment and monitoring the impact of curricular change.

ATLANTIC DIP: simplifying the follow-up of women with previous gestational diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: Previous gestational diabetes (GDM) is associated with a significant lifetime risk of type 2 diabetes. In this study, we assessed the performance of HbA1c and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurements against that of 75 g oral glucose tolerance testing (OGTT) for the follow-up screening of women with previous GDM. METHODS: Two hundred and sixty-six women with previous GDM underwent the follow-up testing (mean of 2.6 years (s.d. 1.0) post-index pregnancy) using HbA1c (100%), and 75 g OGTT (89%) or FPG (11%). American Diabetes Association (ADA) criteria for abnormal glucose tolerance were used. DESIGN, COHORT STUDY, AND RESULTS: The ADA HbA1c high-risk cut-off of 39 mmol/mol yielded sensitivity of 45% (95% CI 32, 59), specificity of 84% (95% CI 78, 88), negative predictive value (NPV) of 87% (95% CI 82, 91) and positive predictive value (PPV) of 39% (95% CI 27, 52) for detecting abnormal glucose tolerance. ADA high-risk criterion for FPG of 5.6 mmol/l showed sensitivity of 80% (95% CI 66, 89), specificity of 100% (95% CI 98, 100), NPV of 96% (95% CI 92, 98) and PPV of 100% (95% CI 91, 100). Combining HbA1c ≥39 mmol/mol with FPG ≥5.6 mmol/l yielded sensitivity of 90% (95% CI 78, 96), specificity of 84% (95% CI 78, 88), NPV of 97% (95% CI 94, 99) and PPV of 56% (95% CI 45, 66). CONCLUSIONS: Combining test cut-offs of 5.6 mmol/l and HbA1c 39 mmol/mol identifies 90% of women with abnormal glucose tolerance post-GDM (mean 2.6 years (s.d.1.0) post-index pregnancy). Applying this follow-up strategy will reduce the number of OGTT tests required by 70%, will be more convenient for women and their practitioners, and is likely to lead to increased uptake of long-term retesting by these women whose risk for type 2 diabetes is substantially increased.

A prospective study of risk factors for foot ulceration: the West of Ireland Diabetes Foot Study.

BACKGROUND: This is the first study to examine risk factors for diabetic foot ulceration in Irish general practice. AIM: To determine the prevalence of established risk factors for foot ulceration in a community-based cohort, and to explore the potential for estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) to act as a novel risk factor. DESIGN: A prospective observational study. METHODS: Patients with diabetes attending 12 (of 17) invited general practices were invited for foot screening. Validated clinical tests were carried out at baseline to assess for vascular and sensory impairment and foot deformity. Ulcer incidence was ascertained by patient self-report and medical record. Patients were re-assessed 18 months later. RESULTS: Of 828 invitees, 563 (68%) attended screening. On examination 23-25% had sensory dysfunction and 18-39% had evidence of vascular impairment. Using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network risk stratification system we found the proportion at moderate and high risk of future ulceration to be 25% and 11%, respectively. At follow-up 16/383 patients (4.2%) developed a new foot ulcer (annual incidence rate of 2.6%). We observed an increasing probability of abnormal vascular and sensory test results (pedal pulse palpation, doppler waveform assessment, 10 g monofilament, vibration perception and neuropathy disability score) with declining eGFR levels. We were unable to show an independent association between new ulceration and reduced eGFR [Odds ratio 1.01; P = 0.64]. CONCLUSION: Our data show the extent of foot complications in a representative sample of diabetes patients in Ireland. Use of eGFR did not improve identification of patients at risk of foot ulceration.

The prevalence of diabetes, pre-diabetes and the metabolic syndrome in an Irish regional homeless population.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes is a major chronic health condition. Prevalence is rising, superseding public health estimates. Chronic diseases are more common among lower socioeconomic groups, for example, the homeless population. There is paucity of data on the health status of the homeless population in Ireland, and the prevalence of diabetes and associated cardiovascular risk factors is unknown. AIM: We aimed to assess the prevalence of diabetes, pre-diabetes and the metabolic syndrome (MetS) in an Irish regional homeless population. DESIGN: This study is a cross-sectional study of the homeless population living in a regional university city of Ireland. METHODS: After informed consent and following an overnight fast, blood was drawn for fasting plasma glucose, total cholesterol, triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein, low-density lipoprotein and glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c). A 75 g glucose load was given orally and an oral glucose tolerance test completed. Anthropometric measurements and blood pressure were recorded. Smoking, alcohol and drug status were noted. RESULTS: Of the 252 participants, 8% (n = 20), 10% (n = 24) and 21% (n = 54) were diagnosed with type 2 diabetes, pre-diabetes and MetS, respectively. Obesity (body mass index >30) was present in 22%, while 90% displayed abdominal obesity. Participants who screened positive for diabetes, pre-diabetes and MetS demonstrated an inferior cardiovascular risk profile. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of diabetes, pre-diabetes and MetS in this homeless population is in keeping with national estimates. As this cohort is less likely to seek health care, this may result in later diagnosis and a greater risk of diabetic complications at presentation.

Atlantic DIP: subject recruitment, data collection, missing data management and analysis procedures.

This paper describes the experiences related to the universal screening study for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) with reference to the subject recruitment process, data collection processes, (data entry, editing, quality assurance) and statistical analysis including the importance of missing data.

Changing clinical practice can improve clinical outcomes for women with pre-gestational diabetes mellitus.

Prospective evaluation of pregnancy outcomes in women with pre-gestational diabetes over 6 years. The ATLANTIC Diabetes in Pregnancy group represents 5 antenatal centres along the Irish Atlantic seaboard, providing care for women with diabetes throughout pregnancy. In 2007 the group published a report that recognised that women were poorly prepared for pregnancy and that outcomes were sub-optimal. A change in practice occurred, offering women specialist-led, evidence-based care, both pre-pregnancy and combined antenatal/diabetes clinics during pregnancy. We now compare outcomes from 2005-2007 with 2008-2010. There was an increase in the numbers attending pre-conception care. Glycemic control before and throughout pregnancy improved. There was an overall increase in live births and decrease in perinata mortality rate. There was a decrease in large-for-gestational-age babies in mothers with Type 1 Diabetes. Elective Caesarean section rates increased while emergency section rates decreased. More women had Type 2 diabetes over time and these women were more likely to be obese. Changing the process of clinical care delivery can improve outcomes in for women with pre-gestational diabetes.

ATLANTIC DIP: pregnancy outcomes for women with type 1 and type 2 diabetes.

ATLANTIC DIP prospectively evaluated the perinatal and maternal outcomes of pregnancies complicated by Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes during 2006/2007 in 5 antenatal centres. All women with established diabetes for at least 6 months prior to the index pregnancy and booking for antenatal care between 1/1/2006 and 31/12/2007 were included in the study. Results were collected electronically via the DIAMOND Diabetes Information System. Pregnancy outcome was compared with that of the background population receiving antenatal care in the region during the same time. There were 104 singleton pregnancies during the period of study. The stillbirth rate (SBR) of 25/1000 was 5 times greater than that reported in the background population at 5/1000 and the perinatal mortality rate (PMR) of 25/1000 was 3.5 times greater than background 7/1000. The congenital malformation rate (CMR) of 24/1000 was twice that observed in the background population. Women were not well prepared for pregnancy with 28% receiving pre pregnancy care (PPC), 43% receiving pre pregnancy folic acid and 51% achieving a HbA1C < = 7% at first antenatal visit. Pregnancy induced hypertension (PIH) and/or pre eclampsia toxaemia (PET) were three times more common than in women in the background population. In conclusion women are not well prepared for pregnancy. Maternal and infant morbidity and infant mortality are greater in women with diabetes. A regional pre pregnancy care (PPC) programme and centralised glucose management are urgently needed.

Atlantic DIP: the prevalence and consequences of gestational diabetes in Ireland.

ATLANTIC DIP carried out a universal screening programme for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) along the Irish Atlantic seaboard. Using a 75g OGTT and new International Association of Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) cut off points for diagnosis we found the prevalence of GDM to be 12.4%. Pregnancies complicated by GDM displayed increased morbidities for mother and infant when compared to women who had normal glucose tolerance. With rising obesity levels and older age of mothers, both risk factors for GDM, these results would support a national universal screening programme.

New estimates of the costs of universal screening for gestational diabetes mellitus in Ireland.

The new International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) diagnostic criteria have been predicted to increase the prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus 2-to-3 fold and will have important resource implications for healthcare systems. A bottom-up, prevalence-based analysis was undertaken to estimate the costs of universal screening for gestational diabetes mellitus in Ireland using the new criteria. Healthcare activity was identified from the Atlantic Diabetes in Pregnancy database and grouped into five categories: (i) screening and testing, (ii) GDM treatment, (iii) prenatal care, (iv) delivery care, and (v) neonatal care. When individual resource components were valued using unit cost data and aggregated, the total healthcare cost was estimated at Euro 46,311,301 (95% CI: Euro 36,381,038, Euro 68,007,432). The average cost per case detected was Euro 351 (95% CI: (Euro 126, Euro 558) and the average total cost per case detected and treated was Euro 9,325 (95% CI: Euro 5,982, Euro 13,996). Further research is required to determine the cost effectiveness of screening in the region with a view to improving resource allocation in this area in the future.

Is there a socioeconomic gradient in the prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus?

Previous studies have shown an association between Type 2 diabetes and lower socioeconomic status. This link is less clear in those with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). We test for a socioeconomic gradient in the prevalence of GDM by analysing data on 9,842 pregnant women who were offered testing for GDM in the Atlantic Diabetes in Pregnancy universal screening programme. A bivariate probit model relating GDM prevalence to socioeconomic status was estimated, controlling for variation in screening uptake rates across socioeconomic groups. The estimated increased prevalence of GDM is 8.6% [95% CI 2.7%-12.0%] for women in the lowest socioeconomic group when compared to the highest, suggesting a strong socioeconomic gradient in the prevalence of GDM. This gradient is found to be driven by differences in personal, clinical and lifestyle factors across socioeconomic groups.

Psychological stress associated with diabetes during pregnancy: a pilot study.

Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) affects approximately 12% of women. The impact of a diagnosis of GDM may lead to increased stress in pregnancy due to the demands of adherence to a treatment regimen and maternal concern about adverse outcomes for the mother and baby. We examined the psychosocial profile of 25 women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and compared them to 25 non-diabetic pregnant women. Measures administered included the Pregnancy Experiences Scale (PES), the Depression, Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS), the Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale (PAID-5) and the Perceived Social Support Scale (PSSS). The GDM group reported a significantly greater ratio of pregnancy 'hassles' to pregnancy 'uplifts'. The GDM group also had a significantly higher Depression score and were twice as likely to score above the cut-off for possible depression. Elevated levels of diabetes-related distress were found in 40% of women with GDM. In addition, the GDM group reported less social support from outside the family. Our preliminary study indicates that the experience of GDM appears to be associated with increased psychological distress in comparison to the experience of non-diabetic pregnant women. This may indicate the need for psychological screening in GDM and the provision of psychological support in some cases.

Trimester-specific reference intervals for IFCC standardised haemoglobin A(1c): new criterion to diagnose gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM)?

We established trimester-specific reference intervals for IFCC standardised HbA(1c) in 311 non-diabetic Caucasian pregnant women (n = 246) and non-pregnant women (n = 65). A selective screening strategy based on risk factors for gestational diabetes was employed. Pregnancy trimester was defined as trimester 1 (T1, n = 40) up to 12 weeks + 6 days, trimester 2 (T2, n = 106) 13 to 27 weeks + 6 days, trimester 3 (T3, n = 100) > 28 weeks to delivery. The normal HbA(1c) reference interval for Caucasian non-pregnant women was 29-37 mmol/mol (DCCT: 4.8-5.5%), T1: 24-36 mmol/mol (DCCT: 4.3-5.4%), T2: 25-35 mmol/mol (DCCT: 4.4-5.4%), and T3: 28-39 mmol/mol (DCCT: 4.7-5.7%). HbA(1c) was significantly decreased in trimesters 1 (P < 0.01) and 2 (P < 0.001) compared to non-pregnant women. Retrospective application of selective screening to Caucasian women of the Atlantic DIP cohort determined that 5,208 met the criteria. 945 of those women (18.1%) were diagnosed with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) using the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) glucose concentration thresholds. HbA(1c) measurement within 2 weeks of the diagnostic Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT) was available in 622 of 945 (66%). Applying the decision threshold for T2: HbA(1c) > 35 mmol/mol (DCCT > 5.4%) identified 287 of 622 (46%) of those with GDM. HbA(1c) measurement in T2 (13 to 27 weeks) should be included in the diagnostic armamentarium for GDM. This would reduce the need for diagnostic OGTT in a significant number of women.

The impact of maternal obesity on gestational outcomes.

To investigate the effects of raised maternal BMI on pregnancy outcome in glucose tolerant women, using the IADPSG criteria. Prospective observational study of fetal and maternal outcome in a cohort of pregnant women recruited to a universal screening programme for gestational diabetes under the ATLANTIC-DIP partnership. Maternal outcomes included glucose, delivery mode, pregnancy induced hypertension (PIH), preeclampsia (PET), antepartum hemorrhage (APH) and postpartum hemorrhage (PPH). Fetal outcomes included birthweight, congenital malformation, fetal death, neonatal jaundice, hypoglycemia and respiratory distress. Increasing maternal BMI was associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes: higher cesarean section rates, pre-eclamptic toxemia, pregnancy induced hypertension, increased birth weight and congenital malformation. There was also an association between normal range glucose and emergency cesarean section, hypertension of pregnancy and birthweight. In spite of tightening criteria for hyperglycemia during pregnancy, raised BMI is associated with adverse pregnancy outcome.

Breast-feeding is associated with reduced postpartum maternal glucose intolerance after gestational diabetes.

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is associated with adverse foetal and maternal outcomes, and identifies women at risk of future Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM). Breast-feeding may improve postpartum maternal glucose tolerance. We prospectively examined the prevalence of postpartum dysglycaemia after GDM and examined the effect of lactation on postpartum glucose tolerance. We compared postpartum 75g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) results from 300 women with GDM and 220 controls with normal gestational glucose tolerance (NGT). Breast-feeding data was collected at time of OGTT. Postpartum OGTT results were classified as normal [fasting plasma glucose (FPG) < 5.6mmol/l, 2-h < 7.8 mmol/l] and abnormal [impaired fasting glucose (IFG), FPG 5.6-6.9 mmol/l; impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), 2-h glucose 7.8-11 mmol/l; IFG+IGT; T2DM, FPG > or = 7 mmol/l +/- 2h glucose > or = 11.1 mmol/l]. 6 (2.7%) with NGT in pregnancy had postpartum dysglycaemia compared to 57 (19%) with GDM in index pregnancy (p < 0.001). Non-European ethnicity (OR 3.40, 95% CI 1.45-8.02, p = 0.005), family history of T2DM (OR 2.14, 95% CI 1.06-4.32, p = 0.034) and gestational insulin use (OR 2.62, 95% CI 1.17-5.87 p = 0.019) were associated with persistent dysglycaemia. The prevalence of persistent hyperglycaemia was significantly lower in women who breast-fed versus bottle-fed postpartum (8.2% v 18.4%, p < 0.001). Breast-feeding may confer beneficial metabolic effects after GDM and should be encouraged.

Moderate and extreme maternal obesity.

The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of moderate and extreme obesity among an Irish obstetric population over a 10-year period, and to evaluate the obstetric features of such pregnancies. Of 31,869 women delivered during the years 2000-2009, there were 306 women in the study group, including 173 in the moderate or Class 2 obese category (BMI 35-39.9) and 133 in the extreme or Class 3 obese category (BMI > or = 40).The prevalence of obese women with BMI > or = 35 was 9.6 per 1000 (0.96%), with an upward trend observed from 2.1 per 1000 in the year 2000, to 11.8 per 1000 in the year 2009 (P = 0.001). There was an increase in emergency caesarean section (EMCS) risk for primigravida versus multigravid women, within both obese categories (P < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference in EMCS rates observed between Class 2 and Class 3 obese women, when matched for parity. The prevalence of moderate and extreme obesity reported in this population is high, and appears to be increasing. The increased rates of abdominal delivery, and the levels of associated morbidity observed, have serious implications for such women embarking on pregnancy.

Atlantic Diabetes in Pregnancy (DIP): the prevalence and outcomes of gestational diabetes mellitus using new diagnostic criteria.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: New diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) have recently been published. We wished to evaluate what impact these new criteria would have on GDM prevalence and outcomes in a predominantly European population. METHODS: The Atlantic Diabetes In Pregnancy (DIP) programme performed screening for GDM in 5,500 women with an oral glucose tolerance test at 24-28 weeks. GDM was defined according to the new International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) criteria and compared with previous WHO criteria; maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes were prospectively recorded. RESULTS: Of the participants, 12.4% and 9.4% were diagnosed with GDM using IADPSG and WHO criteria, respectively. IADPSG GDM pregnancies were associated with a statistically significant increased incidence of adverse maternal outcomes (gestational hypertension, polyhydramnios and Caesarean section) and neonatal outcomes (prematurity, large for gestational age, neonatal unit admission, neonatal hypoglycaemia and respiratory distress). The odds ratio for the development of these adverse outcomes remained significant after adjustment for maternal age, body mass index and non-European ethnicity. Those women who were classified as having normal glucose tolerance by WHO criteria but as having GDM by IADPSG criteria also had significant adverse pregnancy outcomes. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: GDM prevalence is higher when using newer IADPSG, compared with WHO, criteria, and these women and their offspring experience significant adverse pregnancy outcomes. Higher rates of GDM pose a challenge to healthcare systems, but improved screening provides an opportunity to attempt to reduce the associated morbidity for mother and child.

The cost of universal screening for gestational diabetes mellitus in Ireland.

AIMS: To estimate the costs associated with universal screening for gestational diabetes mellitus in Ireland. METHODS: Bottom-up, prevalence-based cost analysis. Healthcare activity identified using the Atlantic Diabetes in Pregnancy (ATLANTIC DIP) database was grouped into five categories: screening and testing, gestational diabetes treatment, prenatal care, delivery care and neonatal care. A vector of unit cost data (euros in 2008 prices) was applied to specified resource use and the total healthcare cost calculated. A series of one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were undertaken to explore the uncertainty in the analysis. RESULTS: When individual resource components were valued and aggregated, the total healthcare cost of gestational diabetes in Ireland was estimated at €12 433 320 (95% CI €9 298 228-16 778 193). The average cost per case detected was €1621 (95% CI €524-2603) and the average total cost per case detected and treated was €11 903 (95% CI €7645-16 121). CONCLUSIONS: This research provides the first estimates of the healthcare costs associated with gestational diabetes mellitus in Ireland. Further research is required to determine the cost-effectiveness of gestational diabetes screening in the region with a view to improving resource allocation in this area in the future.

Traveller health: prevalence of diabetes, pre diabetes and the metabolic syndrome.

Irish Travellers are an ethnic minority group exposed to a myriad of social and health inequalities. Their current life expectancy equals that of the background population in the 1940s and one of the main causes of death is cardiovascular disease (CVD). There is a paucity of information on CVD risk factor assessment in the research literature in this population. This study assesses the prevalence of Diabetes, Pre-Diabetes and the Metabolic Syndrome (MetS) in a sample population from this community. Working with the Galway Traveller Movement, and following an overnight fast we measured fasting plasma glucose, HDL-cholesterol and Triglycerides. In addition weight, height, waist circumference (WC) and blood pressure (BP) were recorded. Of the 47 subjects, there were 4 (8.5%) participants identified as having diabetes, 5 (10.6%) pre-diabetes and 25 (53.2%) with the metabolic syndrome. The point prevalence of diabetes was calculated as 8.5%, pre-diabetes 10.6% and the metabolic syndrome 53.2%. In addition abdominal obesity was present in 70% and hypertension in 43%. Targeted screening for glucose abnormalities and traditional CVD risk factors is needed. Based on current literature, appropriate interventions might reasonably be expected to lower mortality and increase life expectancy.