Comparison of ICSI and conventional IVF in non-male factor patients with less than four oocytes.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to analyse our clinical results for a particular subgroup of patients with poor ovarian response (POR) to clarify if lower number of oocytes is a drawback for proceeding to C-IVF. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, patient files of all couples (#1733) who underwent oocyte retrieval between January 2017 and December 2019 were reviewed and 191 cases diagnosed with non-male factor infertility in which ≤ 3 cumulus-oocyte complexes available for fertilisation were analysed. Exclusion criteria were: woman age > 42, patients with a history of previous ART trial, prenatal genetic testing cycles and couples undergoing total cryopreservation for any indication. Three groups were constructed depending on the method of fertilisation and on semen quality as follows: IVF non-male factor (Group 1, n = 77); ICSI non-male factor (Group 2, n = 65); ICSI male factor-ICSI/MF n = 49 according to WHO reference values. Main outcome parameters were: fertilisation rate, implantation rate and live birth rate. RESULTS: Fertilisation rate per collected COC was significantly higher in group 1 compared to the other two groups (85.68%, 72.58%, 73.33% respectively, p = 0.004). FR per inseminated oocyte also tended to be higher in group 1 but not reaching a statistically significant level. Both techniques yielded similar implantation rates (20.42%, 28.49%, 23.33% respectively, p = 0.407) and live birth rates (26.8%, 30.6%, 31.1%, respectively, p = 0.643). CONCLUSION: In the presence of normal semen parameters, low egg number is not an indication to perform ICSI. The choice of fertilisation method should be based primarily on semen quality, in combination with the patient's previous history regardless of the ovarian reserve.

Modified natural protocol seems superior to natural and artificial protocols for preparing the endometrium in frozen embryo transfer cycles.

BACKGROUND: Although several studies claim higher success rates in natural cycle (NC) and modified natural cycle (mNC) protocols, currently, there is no consensus on the most effective method of endometrium preparation prior to frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles. We aimed to find out the best protocol by comparing three different protocols for preparing the endometrium in FET cycles. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a private in-vitro fertilization (IVF) center. Medical records of all patients enrolled in frozen embryo transfer cycles between November 2017 and February 2019 were reviewed. Group I (N.=94) included patients who underwent artificial endometrial preparation (AC), group II (N.=23) confined patients enrolled in mNC and group III (N.=12) included patients who had NC protocol. Main outcome parameters were clinical pregnancy rates, implantation rates and miscarriage rates. RESULTS: There was a tendency towards higher clinical pregnancy rate in mNC group. Clinical pregnancy rates of the three groups were 54.3%, 65.2% and 33.3% respectively (P=0.199). Implantation rate was significantly higher in group II (34%, 50% and 12% respectively, P=0.006). Miscarriage rates were similar for the three groups. CONCLUSIONS: Although not reaching a statistically significant level, there is a tendency towards higher implantation rate and pregnancy rate in mNC protocol compared to true NC and AC protocols.