Effect of Propolis on Salivary Glands After Radiotherapy.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effects of increasing propolis doses on salivary glands exposed to radiotherapy (RT). METHODS: Thirty-seven rats were divided into 4 groups: The control group (G0, n: 7), G1 group (n: 10), G2 group (n: 10), and G3 group (n: 10). The rats in the G1 group received 15 Gray (Gy) RT only to the head and neck area. The rats in the G2 and G3 groups received 15 Gy RT for the head and neck area along with 100 mg/kg/ml and 200 mg/kg/ml of propolis. The parotid, submandibular, and sublingual glands of rats were immunohistochemically stained with aquaporin-1 (AQP-1) and aquaporin-5 (AQP-5). They were also evaluated for malondialdehyde (MDA), superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione peroxidase (GPO), total antioxidant (TAS), and total oxidant status (TOS). RESULTS: AQP-1 and AQP-5 values were highest in G0 group followed by G3, G2, and G1 groups in decreasing order. The MDA and TOS values were highest in G1 group, which was followed by G2, G3, and G0 groups. The highest GPO, SOD, and TAS values were observed in G0 group followed by G3, G2, and G1 groups in decreasing order. CONCLUSION: It was found that propolis increased antioxidant products and decreased oxidative products in the salivary glands receiving RT in parallel with the dose increase. Similarly, in the groups receiving propolis, an increase in the immune expression of aquaporin molecules was detected in a dose-dependent manner. Based on these data, it could be stated that propolis has a healing effect on the salivary glands exposed to RT.

Evaluation of treatment outcomes and tolerability in older patients with rectal cancer treated with radiotherapy accompanied by the G-8 geriatric score: TROD13-003 multicenter study.

INTRODUCTION: The choice of treatment for rectal cancer often differs in older and younger patients, with the rate of radiotherapy use lower among older adults. In our daily practice, when evaluating a frail older patient with rectal cancer, we usually choose to give less treatment. This may be due to concern that the patient will not be able to tolerate radiotherapy. The Geriatric 8 score (G8GS) is a guide to evaluating treatment tolerability as it relates to frailty in older adults with cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate treatment outcomes and tolerability in older patients with rectal cancer treated with radiotherapy (RT) accompanied by G8GS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients aged 65 and older with stage I-III rectal adenocarcinoma who were treated with RT and had a G8 evaluation were included in this multicenter retrospective study. Prognostic factors related to G8GS were calculated using Chi-square and logistic regression tests and survival rates were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier test using the SPSS v24.0 software. All p-values ≤0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: A total of 699 patients from 16 national institutions were evaluated. The median age was 72 years (range 65-96), and the median follow-up was 43 (range 1-190) months. Four hundred and fifty patients (64%) were categorized as frail with G8GS ≤14 points. Frail patients had higher ages (p = 0.001) and more comorbidities (p = 0.001). Ability to receive concomitant and/or adjuvant chemotherapy rates were significantly higher in fit patients (p = 0.002 and p = 0.001, respectively). No significant difference was observed in terms of grade 3-4 early and late toxicity for both groups. Cancer-related death was higher (p = 0.003), and 5- and 8-year survival rates were significantly lower (p = 0.001), in the frail group. Age and being frail were significantly associated with survival. DISCUSSION: Radiotherapy is a tolerable and effective treatment option for older adults with rectal cancer even with low G8GS. Being in the frail group according to G8GS and having multiple comorbidities was negatively associated with survival. Addressing the medical needs of frail patients through a comprehensive geriatric assessment prior to radiotherapy may improve G8GS, allowing for standard treatment and increased survival rates.

The role of MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT with respect to evaluation of pathological response in the rectal cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to evaluate the role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) in determining the correct stage and predicting the pathological response. METHODS: Seventy one patients with pathologic proven rectal adenocarcinoma, clinical stage IIA-IVA, and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) were evaluated retrospectively. Radiotherapy was delivered 45-50 Gy in 25 fractions with concomitant oral capecitabine. Pelvic MRI, colonoscopy, and 18F-FDG PET-CT were performed before the neoadjuvant treatment (NAT). After NAT, MRI and PET-CT were performed for re-evaluation. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 25 months (range: 3-57 months). Of the 71 patients who underwent NAT, 57 patients underwent surgery. Downstaging was recorded in 48 (84.2%) of 57 patients who underwent surgery. There was no statistically significant difference between both MRI and PET-CT with pathology results in terms of response evaluation. As a result of the comparison of MRI and PET-CT with pathological results; sensitivity and specificity were 91.6% (44/48) and 22.2% (2/9) for MRI, and 100% (47/47) and 12.5% (1/8) for PET-CT, respectively. CONCLUSION: PET-CT and MRI are effective in predicting response to NAT and predictive for the pathological response. A more accurate response can be judged when both PET-CT and MRI are executed together in restaging after NAT.

Improved disease-free survival with adjuvant radiotherapy in early-stage endometrial cancer: 10-year outcome analysis.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate long-term treatment outcomes and prognostic factors affecting survival of patients with early-stage endometrial carcinoma. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data of 311 patients with FIGO stage I-II endometrial cancer, curatively treated at two different tertiary centers between June 2001 and December 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. The patients had primary surgery, 74 (24%) received no further treatment, 4 (1%) obtained chemotherapy only, 234 (75%) received radiotherapy, and 24 (7%) received both. RESULTS: Median follow-up time was 102 (range, 3-205) months. During this period, 68 (21.9%) patients died. 5-year and 10-year disease-free survival (DFS) were 76% and 74.3%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, lower uterine segment invasion positivity and no adjuvant radiotherapy were determined as independent unfavorable prognostic factors for DFS. The 5-year and 10-year disease-specific survival (DSS) were 86.8% and 82.2%, respectively. For DSS, high-grade, lymphovascular space invasion positivity, stage II, ≥ 65 age, and no adjuvant radiotherapy were found to be independent unfavorable prognostic markers. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of our cohort have confirmed the importance of adjuvant radiotherapy on long-term early-stage endometrial carcinoma outcome.

Intraoperative radiotherapy with electrons as partial breast irradiation in limited stage breast cancer: Early term clinical and cosmetic outcomes.

PURPOSE: We aimed to report the experience of intraoperative electron radiation therapy (IOERT) with Mobetron (Intraop Medical Incorporated, Santa Clara, CA, USA) as a partial breast irradiation (PBI) for patients with early-stage breast cancer and explanation of IOERT application and present early clinical and cosmetic result. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between November 2012 and February 2014, in Ankara Oncology Hospital, Radiation Oncology Clinic, was performed IOERT as a PBI with a single dose of 21 Gy for 21selected patients. Median tumor size was 1.5 cm (range, 0.6-2.8 cm). Median treatment duration was 2.04 min (range, 1.26-2.44 min). According to final pathology, two patients were found to have close margin and mastectomy was applied. Three cases (two were N1 mic and one case had perineural invasion and tumor size was >2 cm) received whole breast irradiation. RESULTS: Median follow-up time was 3 years (range, 26-42 months). One patient died because of nonbreast cancer reason, all of the other patients (except one) alive without disease. There was no Grade 3 or 4 toxicities related to the IOERT. Good or excellent cosmesis was revealed 79% (15/19) and 95% (18/19), by physician and patient, respectively. CONCLUSION: IOERT, for patients with early-stage breast cancer as a part of breast-conserving treatment, offer patients better cosmetic results with less skin toxicity and increases comfort of patients by shortening duration of treatment time.