Impact of vaccination against COVID-19 on patients with cancer in ACHOC-C19 study: Real world evidence from one Latin American country.

Introduction: During the pandemic, it has been recommended that vaccination against COVID-19 be a priority for patients with cancer; however, these patients were not included in the initial studies evaluating the available vaccines. Objective: To define the impact of vaccination against COVID-19 in preventing the risk of complications associated with the infection in a cohort of patients with cancer in Colombia. Methods: An analytical observational cohort study, based on national registry of patients with cancer and COVID 19 infection ACHOC-C19, was done. The data was collected from June 2021, until October 2021. Inclusion criteria were: Patients older than 18 years with cancer diagnosis and confirmed COVID-19 infection. Data from the unvaccinated and vaccinated cohorts were compared. Outcomes evaluated included all-cause mortality within 30 days of COVID-19 diagnosis, hospitalization, and need for mechanical ventilation. The estimation of the effect was made through the relative risk (RR), the absolute risk reduction (ARR) and the number needed to treat (NNT). Multivariate analysis was performed using generalized linear models. Results: 896 patients were included, of whom 470 were older than 60 years (52.4%) and 59% were women (n=530). 172 patients were recruited in the vaccinated cohort and 724 in the non-vaccinated cohort (ratio: 1 to 4.2). The cumulative incidence of clinical outcomes among the unvaccinated vs vaccinated patients were: for hospitalization 42% (95% CI: 38.7%-46.1%) vs 29%; (95% CI: 22.4%-36.5%); for invasive mechanical ventilation requirement 8.4% (n=61) vs 4.6% (n=8) and for mortality from all causes 17% (n=123) vs 4.65% (n=8). Conclusion: In our population, unvaccinated patients with cancer have an increased risk of complications for COVID -19 infection, as hospitalization, mechanical ventilation, and mortality. It is highly recommended to actively promote the vaccination among this population.

Effect of Ivermectin on Time to Resolution of Symptoms Among Adults With Mild COVID-19: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Ivermectin is widely prescribed as a potential treatment for COVID-19 despite uncertainty about its clinical benefit. Objective: To determine whether ivermectin is an efficacious treatment for mild COVID-19. Design, Setting, and Participants: Double-blind, randomized trial conducted at a single site in Cali, Colombia. Potential study participants were identified by simple random sampling from the state's health department electronic database of patients with symptomatic, laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 during the study period. A total of 476 adult patients with mild disease and symptoms for 7 days or fewer (at home or hospitalized) were enrolled between July 15 and November 30, 2020, and followed up through December 21, 2020. Intervention: Patients were randomized to receive ivermectin, 300 µg/kg of body weight per day for 5 days (n = 200) or placebo (n = 200). Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcome was time to resolution of symptoms within a 21-day follow-up period. Solicited adverse events and serious adverse events were also collected. Results: Among 400 patients who were randomized in the primary analysis population (median age, 37 years [interquartile range {IQR}, 29-48]; 231 women [58%]), 398 (99.5%) completed the trial. The median time to resolution of symptoms was 10 days (IQR, 9-13) in the ivermectin group compared with 12 days (IQR, 9-13) in the placebo group (hazard ratio for resolution of symptoms, 1.07 [95% CI, 0.87 to 1.32]; P = .53 by log-rank test). By day 21, 82% in the ivermectin group and 79% in the placebo group had resolved symptoms. The most common solicited adverse event was headache, reported by 104 patients (52%) given ivermectin and 111 (56%) who received placebo. The most common serious adverse event was multiorgan failure, occurring in 4 patients (2 in each group). Conclusion and Relevance: Among adults with mild COVID-19, a 5-day course of ivermectin, compared with placebo, did not significantly improve the time to resolution of symptoms. The findings do not support the use of ivermectin for treatment of mild COVID-19, although larger trials may be needed to understand the effects of ivermectin on other clinically relevant outcomes. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04405843.

Mejoramiento de la calidad de la alimentación servida en una organización no gubernamental-red nacional de cuido, San José Costa Rica, 2016 / Improvement in the quality of food served in a non-governmental organization-national childcare network, San José, Costa Rica, 2016

RESUMEN Una buena alimentación durante la niñez es indispensable para un crecimiento y desarrollo óptimo. Por lo que se desarrolló una propuesta de intervención para mejorar la calidad de la alimentación servida a los niños y niñas de 2 a 12 años del Centro de Atención Integral Asociación Teen Challenge, que forma parte de la Red Nacional de Cuido de Costa Rica. El estudio se desarrolló en cinco etapas: diagnóstico, priorización de problemas, diseño de la propuesta de mejora, implementación y evaluación, durante 2016. Los datos se analizaron según los lineamientos nacionales e internacionales relacionados con la calidad: higiénica y sanitaria, bromatológica y sensorial. Se diseñó una propuesta de mejora de 10 sesiones educativas dirigida al personal de atención directa, con 14 estándares de calidad y se planteó la meta de cumplir 11 estándares. Al finalizar, la calidad de la alimentación mejoró; sin embargo, no se cumplió la meta. La realización de este tipo de proyectos es de suma importancia para la salud y bienestar de los menores de edad. La baja presencia de profesionales en Nutrición, poca capacitación y nula supervisión influyen negativamente en la calidad de la alimentación ofrecida en estas instituciones.

ABSTRACT Good nutrition during childhood is essential for optimal growth. For this reason, an intervention proposal was developed to improve the quality of food served to children ages 2 to 12 years at the Teen Challenge Child Care Center, which belongs to the National Child Care Network of Costa Rica. The study was developed in five stages: diagnosis, problem prioritization, intervention program design, implementation and evaluation during 2016. The data was analyzed according to national and international food quality guidelines such as: food safety, bromatological and sensorial properties. The main aspects that were improved were hygiene, food safety and bromatological food quality. A proposal of 10 educational sessions was designed, to be provided to the personnel of the center including teachers and kitchen staff, with 14 standards of quality and the goal was to comply with at least 11 of them. The quality of food served was improved; however, the target was not met. Studies of this type are of high importance for the health and well-being of young people. The low presence of nutrition professionals, lack of training and no supervision, negatively influence the quality of food offered in these spaces.

High Throughput Screening Assay to Identify Modulators of IL-17 Expression.

OBJECTIVE: Herein we demonstrate the successful development of a new RORγt-enhanced IL-17F promoter-luciferase reporter assay and its use in a parallel high throughput screening approach, alongside a RORγt TR-FRET assay, to rapidly identify new small molecule RORγt/IL-17 inhibitors and evaluate their mode of action. MATERIAL & METHODS: We sought to identify cell-permeable small-molecule inhibitors of RORγt for rapid progression into hit-to-lead chemistry. As such, we developed the IL-17F promoter luciferase reporter assay in a stable human T-cell (Jurkat) line expressing the RORγt receptor and miniaturised it to a final volume of 8 µL in 1536 well plates for HTS use in screening a library of > 350k compounds. In parallel, a RORγt TR-FRET binding assay was employed to cross-screen the same set of compounds. This enabled the rapid identification of a small number of cell permeable RORγt antagonists showing promising activity in both assays and also highlighted a larger group of potentially very interesting hits which inhibited IL-17 reporter activity, but did not appear to modulate RORγt directly. RESULT: A rigorous triaging process of the novel non-RORγt IL-17 antagonists was followed, making use of in-silico filtering, historical screening data, selectivity screening using an IL-2 reporter assay with an identical cellular background, and final profiling in a phenotypic PBMC IL-17A production assay. This resulted in the identification of a set of promising small molecule compounds which show IL-17 inhibition via potentially novel pathways. CONCLUSION: This technique for the fast identification of cell-permeable IL-17 modulators acting through different mechanisms, highlights the benefits of adopting a parallel approach combining high throughput profiling of hits in multiple assay formats, with robust in-silico triaging.