Pain control and subconjunctival haemorrhage after intravitreal injection using cooled anaesthetic eyedrops and antiseptics: A prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether cooled anaesthetic eyedrops and antiseptics alleviate pain and minimise subconjunctival haemorrhage following intravitreal injection. METHODS: A prospective, double-masked, randomised controlled trial of 100 participants receiving either cooled (n = 50) or room temperature (n = 50) topical anaesthetic eyedrops and antiseptics before receiving an injection of bevacizumab. Baseline tolerability was estimated using a self-reported pain sensitivity questionnaire. RESULTS: Overall tolerability was comparable between the study group and the control group (0.75 ± 0.13 vs. 0.74 ± 0.14, respectively, p = 0.99). Subconjunctival haemorrhage incidence was similar in both groups (80% vs. 86%, respectively, p = 0.113), as was subconjunctival haemorrhage size (2.75 ± 5.51 mm2 vs. 5.53 ± 10.72 mm2 , respectively, p = 0.11). Sub-group analysis demonstrated that the participants taking daily ocular eyedrops who received cooled anaesthetic eyedrops and antiseptics reported less pain at 10 min and less burning sensation at 24 h compared with matched controls (0.67 ± 1.50 vs. 2.50 ± 3.03, respectively, p = 0.040 and 0.00 ± 0.00 vs. 1.44 ± 2.96, respectively, p = 0.045). Participants who received cooled eyedrops and did not use antithrombotic therapy had smaller-sized subconjunctival haemorrhages compared with matched controls (1.55 ± 1.87 mm2 vs. 8.29 ± 14.61 mm2 , respectively, p = 0.038). Participants with hypertension who received cooled eyedrops had smaller-sized subconjunctival haemorrhage compared with matched controls (2.33 ± 4.99 mm2 vs. 6.89 ± 12.41 mm2 , respectively, p = 0.045). CONCLUSION: The benefit of using cooled anaesthetic eyedrops and antiseptics to alleviate pain and minimise subconjunctival haemorrhage following intravitreal injection was not proven in the general population. It may be beneficial in part for some patients, such as those who regularly use eyedrops, patients with hypertension or those not on antithrombotic therapy.

Surgical success of lateral rectus resection for residual and recurrent esotropia.

PURPOSE: To assess the surgical outcomes of reoperations for residual and recurrent esotropia. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent surgery during 2000-2017 at a tertiary referral medical center for recurrent or residual esotropia was conducted. Patients who underwent bilateral medial rectus recession as primary surgery and lateral rectus resection as second surgery were included. The success rate of second surgery and its association to various factors were examined. Success of reoperation was defined as mean deviation of < 10 prism diopters (= PD) at last follow-up. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients with mean post-operative follow-up of 50.4 ± 31.7 months were included. On last follow-up examination, 15 (55.6%) patients had a successful reoperation and 12 (44.4%) patients had unsuccessful reoperation. The two groups were similar in the pre-operative amount of esotropia for distance and near. On last follow-up examination, the amount of mean deviation was 1.9 PD esotropia (8 PD exotropia to 9 PD esotropia) in the success group and 11.2 PD esotropia (22.5 PD exotropia to 35 PD esotropia) in the failure group. In the failure group, 75.0% of patients were under-corrected (esotropia of ≥ 10 PD) on last follow-up examination. CONCLUSION: Strabismus reoperation in cases of residual or recurrent esotropia was successful in slightly more than half of the patients. Surgical failure was more commonly associated with undercorrection and less with overcorrection.

Achievement of partial combined control of major diabetes targets in primary care correlates with development of chronic complications in T2DM patients--A real life data.

AIMS: Strict long term glucose, cholesterol and blood pressure control is advocated in type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) patients. It is not known whether combined partial goals' achievement affects development of chronic complications. METHODS: We evaluated the relative ability or failure of 5369 T2DM ambulatory patients to achieve and maintain control of blood pressure, glycaemia and cholesterol for 3 consecutive years. Correlation between the extent of combined goal achievement, and development of chronic complications was determined. RESULTS: Only 9 patients (0.17%) fully achieved and none completely failed to achieve all strict goals. Therefore, patients were characterized as either partial achievers (PA) (n=699) or partial non achievers (PNA) (n=322). As compared to PA patients, PNA patients were significantly younger, single, and demonstrated a higher female and Arab ethnicity dominance. PNA patients had higher BMI, received more insulin treatment and consumed more hospital services. The incidence of microvascular complications during 3 years was significantly increased in PNA patients. CONCLUSIONS: A negligible number of primary care patients completely and persistently achieve or fail to achieve combined control of major diabetes targets. Partial achievement of these targets correlates with specific patients' characteristics and incidence of chronic micro-vascular complications.