Intermediate term outcomes with bifurcation coronary stenting using the paclitaxel drug-eluting stent: a single centre experience.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous treatment of bifurcation coronary artery disease (BCD) is complex and, in the era of bare metal stents (BMS), was reported to have a high rate of repeat target lesion revascularization (TLR). Paclitaxel drug-eluting stents (PES) have been used in the treatment of BCD, with better overall outcomes than BMS. Also, acute stent thrombosis (AST), with an incidence ranging from 2.7% to 4.3%, has been reported with the use of bifurcation PES, and remains a concern in treating these patients. In the present report, intermediate term outcomes with BCD stenting using TAXUS Express (Boston Scientific, USA) PES are presented from the Genesis Medical Center. METHODS: In the present retrospective study, 518 consecutive de novo bifurcation stenting procedures are reported. They were performed in 2005 at the present institution using the TAXUS Express PES. Follow-up data on 312 patients (60.2%) was achieved through telephone interviews and reviews of medical records after a mean of 6.7 months. The primary end point of the present study was the combined end points of cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI) and TLR. Secondary outcomes included the individual end points of death, cardiac death, AST, target vessel revascularization (TVR), TLR, ST elevation MI and non-ST elevation MI on intermediate term follow-up. RESULTS: The mean (± SD) age of the patients was 66±12 years. Acute procedural success was 95% (main branch, 99%; side branch, 95.9%). The following intermediate term outcomes with bifurcation drug-eluting stents were: TLR, 6.7%; TVR, 12.2%; definite and probable AST, 1.6%; death, 6.7%; cardiac death, 2.9%; non-ST elevation MI, 0.7%; ST elevation MI, 2.0%; and the combined primary end point, 9.9%. The outcomes for patients who underwent main branch stenting were not statistically different from those with bifurcation stenting, with an overall combined end point favouring main branch stenting alone (5.8% versus 10.8%, P not significant). CONCLUSION: The TAXUS Express PES carry acceptable intermediate term outcomes in the treatment of BCD compared with historic controls with BMS, with low TLR, TVR and overall primary combined end point. Main branch stenting alone is safe, with a trend toward fewer adverse events than bifurcation stenting.

Long-term outcomes in treating left main trifurcation coronary artery disease with the Paclitaxel-eluting stent.

BACKGROUND: Left main trifurcation coronary artery disease stenting is a challenging and complex percutaneous procedure that has been infrequently reported. We present our own experience with left main trifurcation stenting using the Taxus paclitaxel-eluting stent (Boston Scientific). METHODS: Twenty consecutive left main trifurcation stenting procedures were performed in 2005 at our institution. The primary endpoint of the study was the combined endpoints of death, acute stent thrombosis and target lesion revascularization (TLR). Conditional logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the predictors of the primary endpoint using a number of variable combinations. RESULTS: The mean patient age was 71.7 +/- 8.9 years. The procedure was urgent in 10%, and the left main artery was unprotected in 95% of cases. Follow up was achieved in 17/20 (85%) patients, either from medical records or by phone calls. The follow-up median duration was 272 days (range 30 to 534 days). The primary endpoint was met in 5/17 (29.4%) patients. One of 19 patients (5.3%) had a sudden cardiac death 1 month after the procedure, 2/20 patients (10%) experienced an acute in-hospital stent thrombosis, and 2/17 (11.8%) patients underwent TLR. Conditional logistic regression analysis could not identify a relationship between the stenting method and the primary endpoint. The 2 patients who experienced in-hospital thrombosis were the only patients who received a clopidogrel load (600 mg) post-procedure after arrival to the floor, and were not on a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor. All others received their clopidogrel either during the procedure (n = 7) or were on it chronically (n = 11). One patient with acute stent thrombosis did not have a kissing balloon performed post-stent deployment. CONCLUSION: Left main trifurcation stenting carries an overall high rate of adverse events and may need to be reserved for patients who are at high risk or who refuse bypass surgery. Overall TLR is low, but stent thrombosis remains a concern. Although we suspect that thrombosis could be related to failure to perform kissing balloon post-stent deployment and/or not receiving a clopidogrel load until after the procedure, the small number of patients in this study prevents us from making definite statistical conclusions about this observation.