When is it worth performing lymphadenectomy in patients with melanoma micrometastases? A 20-year experience retrospective analysis.

INTRODUCCIÓN: Actualmente existe controversia respecto a los beneficios de realizar linfadenectomía en pacientes de melanoma con una biopsia selectiva de ganglio centinela (BSGC) positiva. La carga tumoral > 1 mm se ha propuesto como el parámetro mas relevante asociado a una linfadenectomía positiva y un deterioro de la supervivencia libre de enfermedad. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Se analizaron los datos de 119 pacientes de melanoma con BSGC positiva atendidos en el periodo entre Junio de 1997 y Junio de 2017. Los pacientes se clasificaron según la carga tumoral en dos grupos: ≤ 1 mm and > 1 mm. RESULTADOS: La linfadenectomía resultó positiva en sólo 6 (10%) pacientes con una carga tumoral ≤ 1 mm, y en 23 (37.7%) pacientes con carga tumoral > 1 mm (p < 0.001). En análisis univariante, la carga tumoral fue el único factor predictivo de linfadenectomía positiva (OR 5.24 (1.94-14.13)). En análisis multivariante, la carga tumoral fue la única variable independiente de supervivencia específica de melanoma (SEM). CONCLUSION: Aunque la realización de linfadenectomía debe individualizarse en cada caso, la carga tumoral > 1 mm puede ser un factor predictivo de la presencia de ganglios no centinelas positivos en piezas de linfadenectomía, y un factor pronostico independiente importante para la SEM. BACKGROUND: The benefits of complete lymph node dissection (CLND) in melanoma patients with a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) have been recently questioned. Sentinel node (SN) tumor burden > 1 mm has been proposed as the most reliable parameter associated with positive CLND and poorer disease-free survival. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between June 1997 and June 2017, data from 119 melanoma patients with positive SLNB were analyzed. Patients were classified by SN burden in two groups: ≤ 1 mm and > 1 mm. RESULTS: CLND was positive in 6 (10%) patients with SN tumor burden ≤ 1 mm and in 23 (37.7%) patients with > 1 mm (p < 0.001). In univariable analysis, SN tumor burden was the only predictive factor of positive CLND (OR 5.24 [1.94-14.13]). In multivariable analysis, SN tumor burden was the only independent factor of melanoma-specific survival (MSS). CONCLUSION: Although CLND should still be considered individually in patients with positive SLNB, SN tumor burden >1 mm might be a good predictive factor of additional positive non-sentinel nodes and a strong independent prognostic factor in melanoma-specific survival.

Computer-aided classification of suspicious pigmented lesions using wide-field images.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Early identification of melanoma is conducted through whole-body visual examinations to detect suspicious pigmented lesions, a situation that fluctuates in accuracy depending on the experience and time of the examiner. Computer-aided diagnosis tools for skin lesions are typically trained using pre-selected single-lesion images, taken under controlled conditions, which limits their use in wide-field scenes. Here, we propose a computer-aided classifier system with such input conditions to aid in the rapid identification of suspicious pigmented lesions at the primary care level. METHODS: 133 patients with a multitude of skin lesions were recruited for this study. All lesions were examined by a board-certified dermatologist and classified into "suspicious" and "non-suspicious". A new clinical database was acquired and created by taking Wide-Field images of all major body parts with a consumer-grade camera under natural illumination condition and with a consistent source of image variability. 3-8 images were acquired per patient on different sites of the body, and a total of 1759 pigmented lesions were extracted. A machine learning classifier was optimized and build into a computer aided classification system to binary classify each lesion using a suspiciousness score. RESULTS: In a testing set, our computer-aided classification system achieved a sensitivity of 100% for suspicious pigmented lesions that were later confirmed by dermoscopy examination ("SPL_A") and 83.2% for suspicious pigmented lesions that were not confirmed after examination ("SPL_B"). Sensitivity for non-suspicious lesions was 72.1%, and accuracy was 75.9%. With these results we defined a suspiciousness score that is aligned with common macro-screening (naked eye) practices. CONCLUSIONS: This work demonstrates that wide-field photography combined with computer-aided classification systems can distinguish suspicious from non-suspicious pigmented lesions, and might be effective to assess the severity of a suspicious pigmented lesions. We believe this approach could be useful to support skin screenings at a population-level.

Angiokeratoma of the glans penis: clinical, histopathological and dermoscopic correlation.

Angiokeratoma is a benign vascular lesion characterized by vascular ectasia in the upper dermis and hyperkeratosis. We report a case with lesions on the glans penis, a very rare location. In addition, we report the dermoscopic findings.

Nódulo en el pabellón auricular / Nodule on the pinna

No disponible